FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK
FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK
FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
in a straight section of the fiber at an angle less<br />
than the critical angle may have their angle of incidence<br />
on the core-cladding interface increased by the<br />
bends and thus be partially transmitted into the cladding.<br />
A more detailed wave theory analysis of periodic<br />
bend-induced coupling indicates that the level of coupling<br />
between modes, including non-attenuating core modes<br />
as well as attenuating core and cladding modes, is<br />
strongest when the difference between the effective<br />
propagation constants of a pair of modes, (Bi - Bj), is<br />
equal to 2 /1..<br />
range 0.5N < F > 1.5 N. In the latter caae, 9“ corresponded<br />
closely to the critical incidence angle, thus<br />
the light waa injected mainly into the highest order<br />
propagating modes and therefore was more eaaily ejected<br />
from the core into the cladding.<br />
loofiT_..-<br />
,_L<br />
1::::-,-<br />
1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I<br />
T – - * — - 0 - - 1<br />
A number of studies of this phenomenon have<br />
been conducted. For example, the system shown in Fig.<br />
5.27 was used at the Hughes Research Laboratories. As<br />
EO<br />
~ —<br />
L<br />
I<br />
FIBER<br />
DETECTOR MODE DEFORMER<br />
STRIPPER<br />
Fig. 5.27 A microbend intensity-type<br />
sor system developed by the<br />
Laboratories.<br />
fiberoptic sen-<br />
Hughes Research<br />
indicated in the figure, light was injected into a<br />
multimode step-index fiber which was passed through a<br />
deformer element. In this case the intensity of the<br />
core light reaching the end of the fiber was monitored.<br />
By using a helium-neon laser with a well-collimated<br />
beam it was possible to vary the incidence angle of<br />
light into the fiber and thus inject light into a fairly<br />
well defined set of propagating core modes. On sections<br />
of the cladding, just before and just after the<br />
deformer, mode strippers were employed. These elements,<br />
which in their simplest form might consist of black<br />
paint applied to a few centimeters of the outer surface<br />
of the cladding, absorb almost all of the light that<br />
my be propagating in the cladding of the fiber. The<br />
use of cladding mode strippers first insured that only<br />
core light reached the section of fiber in the deformer<br />
and then that any core light ejected into the cladding<br />
by the deformer was absorbed so that it did not reach<br />
the photodetector.<br />
Uaing the system outlined in Fig. 5.27, the<br />
Hughes’ inveatigatora measured the transmitted optical<br />
intensity as a function of the force applied to the<br />
transducer (microbend deformer). This was done for<br />
several different angles of incidence of the input light<br />
and the reaulting data la preaented in Fig. 5.28. Aa<br />
shown in that figure, when the input incidence angle<br />
was set at 0°, i.e., for light injected along the axis<br />
of the fiber, the output intensity decreased by about<br />
twenty percent as the force applied to the deformer increaaed<br />
from O to 2 newtons. On the other hand, for<br />
light incident at 9°, the transmitted intensity decreased<br />
to approximately 40 percent of the input when the<br />
applied force waa again increased to 2 N. In addition,<br />
the slope of the transmission intensity, I, veraus applied<br />
force, F, curve was nearly conatant over the<br />
1<br />
r<br />
r<br />
——— O.ODEG .<br />
20<br />
----- 7.ODEG 0<br />
-“---”- 8.ODEG ❑ 1<br />
} ------- 9.0 DEG ●<br />
4<br />
oo~<br />
0.5 1.0 1.5<br />
FORCE N<br />
Fig. 5.28 The percent transmission of core input<br />
light obtained at the output as a function<br />
of applied force in a microbend intensitytype<br />
fiberoptic sensor.<br />
After J. Fields, et al., J. Acouat. Soc. Am. ~, 816<br />
(1980).<br />
Using the results of this and aimilar experiments,<br />
the Hughes investigatora, in cooperation with<br />
the Physical Acouatica Branch of the U.S. Naval Reaearch<br />
Labora~ory, deaigned and teated a hydrophore employing<br />
such a microbend deformer as the transducer element.<br />
Their first prototype unit ia aketched in Fig. 5.29<br />
DIAPH<br />
/-- FIBERLEADS<br />
/<br />
Fig. 5.29 A microbend intenaity-type fiberoptic sensor<br />
hydrophore developed by the Hughes Research<br />
Laboratories and the U.S. Naval Research<br />
Laboratory.<br />
After Fields and Cole, Appl. Opt. ~, 3265 (1980),<br />
(See Ref. 5 in Subsection 5.2.6). One deformer plate<br />
was rigidly mounted to the cylindrical ahell of the<br />
hydrophore while the other was attached to a thin diapragm.<br />
In addition to the through-put fiber, a second<br />
inactive fiber was included to insure that the deformer<br />
plates remain parallel during operation.<br />
At this point it would be uaeful to review<br />
some of the basic acoustical levels and unita of meaaure.<br />
Referring to Fig. 5.30, one frequently encountered<br />
acoustic reference pressure level encountered in air<br />
acouatics is 0.0002 dynea/cm2. This is the accepted<br />
5-1o