25.07.2014 Views

FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK

FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK

FIBEROPTIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY HANDBOOK

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

in a straight section of the fiber at an angle less<br />

than the critical angle may have their angle of incidence<br />

on the core-cladding interface increased by the<br />

bends and thus be partially transmitted into the cladding.<br />

A more detailed wave theory analysis of periodic<br />

bend-induced coupling indicates that the level of coupling<br />

between modes, including non-attenuating core modes<br />

as well as attenuating core and cladding modes, is<br />

strongest when the difference between the effective<br />

propagation constants of a pair of modes, (Bi - Bj), is<br />

equal to 2 /1..<br />

range 0.5N < F > 1.5 N. In the latter caae, 9“ corresponded<br />

closely to the critical incidence angle, thus<br />

the light waa injected mainly into the highest order<br />

propagating modes and therefore was more eaaily ejected<br />

from the core into the cladding.<br />

loofiT_..-<br />

,_L<br />

1::::-,-<br />

1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I<br />

T – - * — - 0 - - 1<br />

A number of studies of this phenomenon have<br />

been conducted. For example, the system shown in Fig.<br />

5.27 was used at the Hughes Research Laboratories. As<br />

EO<br />

~ —<br />

L<br />

I<br />

FIBER<br />

DETECTOR MODE DEFORMER<br />

STRIPPER<br />

Fig. 5.27 A microbend intensity-type<br />

sor system developed by the<br />

Laboratories.<br />

fiberoptic sen-<br />

Hughes Research<br />

indicated in the figure, light was injected into a<br />

multimode step-index fiber which was passed through a<br />

deformer element. In this case the intensity of the<br />

core light reaching the end of the fiber was monitored.<br />

By using a helium-neon laser with a well-collimated<br />

beam it was possible to vary the incidence angle of<br />

light into the fiber and thus inject light into a fairly<br />

well defined set of propagating core modes. On sections<br />

of the cladding, just before and just after the<br />

deformer, mode strippers were employed. These elements,<br />

which in their simplest form might consist of black<br />

paint applied to a few centimeters of the outer surface<br />

of the cladding, absorb almost all of the light that<br />

my be propagating in the cladding of the fiber. The<br />

use of cladding mode strippers first insured that only<br />

core light reached the section of fiber in the deformer<br />

and then that any core light ejected into the cladding<br />

by the deformer was absorbed so that it did not reach<br />

the photodetector.<br />

Uaing the system outlined in Fig. 5.27, the<br />

Hughes’ inveatigatora measured the transmitted optical<br />

intensity as a function of the force applied to the<br />

transducer (microbend deformer). This was done for<br />

several different angles of incidence of the input light<br />

and the reaulting data la preaented in Fig. 5.28. Aa<br />

shown in that figure, when the input incidence angle<br />

was set at 0°, i.e., for light injected along the axis<br />

of the fiber, the output intensity decreased by about<br />

twenty percent as the force applied to the deformer increaaed<br />

from O to 2 newtons. On the other hand, for<br />

light incident at 9°, the transmitted intensity decreased<br />

to approximately 40 percent of the input when the<br />

applied force waa again increased to 2 N. In addition,<br />

the slope of the transmission intensity, I, veraus applied<br />

force, F, curve was nearly conatant over the<br />

1<br />

r<br />

r<br />

——— O.ODEG .<br />

20<br />

----- 7.ODEG 0<br />

-“---”- 8.ODEG ❑ 1<br />

} ------- 9.0 DEG ●<br />

4<br />

oo~<br />

0.5 1.0 1.5<br />

FORCE N<br />

Fig. 5.28 The percent transmission of core input<br />

light obtained at the output as a function<br />

of applied force in a microbend intensitytype<br />

fiberoptic sensor.<br />

After J. Fields, et al., J. Acouat. Soc. Am. ~, 816<br />

(1980).<br />

Using the results of this and aimilar experiments,<br />

the Hughes investigatora, in cooperation with<br />

the Physical Acouatica Branch of the U.S. Naval Reaearch<br />

Labora~ory, deaigned and teated a hydrophore employing<br />

such a microbend deformer as the transducer element.<br />

Their first prototype unit ia aketched in Fig. 5.29<br />

DIAPH<br />

/-- FIBERLEADS<br />

/<br />

Fig. 5.29 A microbend intenaity-type fiberoptic sensor<br />

hydrophore developed by the Hughes Research<br />

Laboratories and the U.S. Naval Research<br />

Laboratory.<br />

After Fields and Cole, Appl. Opt. ~, 3265 (1980),<br />

(See Ref. 5 in Subsection 5.2.6). One deformer plate<br />

was rigidly mounted to the cylindrical ahell of the<br />

hydrophore while the other was attached to a thin diapragm.<br />

In addition to the through-put fiber, a second<br />

inactive fiber was included to insure that the deformer<br />

plates remain parallel during operation.<br />

At this point it would be uaeful to review<br />

some of the basic acoustical levels and unita of meaaure.<br />

Referring to Fig. 5.30, one frequently encountered<br />

acoustic reference pressure level encountered in air<br />

acouatics is 0.0002 dynea/cm2. This is the accepted<br />

5-1o

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!