Local polarization dynamics in ferroelectric materials
Local polarization dynamics in ferroelectric materials
Local polarization dynamics in ferroelectric materials
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Rep. Prog. Phys. 73 (2010) 056502<br />
S V Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong> et al<br />
Response, a.u.<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
-0.5<br />
-1.0<br />
-1.5<br />
-2.0<br />
(a)<br />
Switchable <strong>polarization</strong>, a.u.<br />
1.5<br />
1.0<br />
0.5<br />
0.0<br />
-40 -20 0 20 40<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Bias, V dc<br />
(b)<br />
Bias w<strong>in</strong>dow, V dc<br />
Nucleation bias, V<br />
(c)<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Bias w<strong>in</strong>dow, V dc<br />
Work of switch<strong>in</strong>g, a.u.<br />
(d)<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Bias w<strong>in</strong>dow, Vdc<br />
Figure 39. (a) Evolution of PFM hysteresis loops on an epitaxial PZT film as a function of bias. (b) Bias w<strong>in</strong>dow dependence of switchable<br />
<strong>polarization</strong>. (c) Bias dependence of () positive and () negative nucleation bias. (d) Bias w<strong>in</strong>dow dependence of effective work of<br />
switch<strong>in</strong>g. Shown <strong>in</strong> (b) and (d) are values determ<strong>in</strong>ed from the functional fit ( ) and by direct <strong>in</strong>tegration of the area below the loop (⊓⊔).<br />
Repr<strong>in</strong>ted from [329]. Copyright 2006, American Institute of Physics.<br />
Response, a.u.<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
-0.2<br />
-0.4<br />
-0.6<br />
-0.8<br />
-1.0<br />
-10 -5 0 5 10<br />
(a)<br />
Bias, V dc<br />
Response, a.u.<br />
(b)<br />
0.00<br />
-0.05<br />
-0.10<br />
-0.15<br />
-0.20<br />
-10 -5 0 0<br />
Bias, V dc<br />
Figure 40. The effect of ambient conditions on the hysteresis loop shape. (a) Hysteresis loops for a clean <strong>in</strong>sult<strong>in</strong>g STO surface.<br />
(b) Hysteresis loop for conductive SrRuO 3 /STO th<strong>in</strong> film. Repr<strong>in</strong>ted from [329]. Copyright 2006, American Institute of Physics.<br />
this behavior to the electrocapillary condensation of water<br />
layers at the tip–surface junction [330, 331], result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
an ‘unsaturated’ electromechanical hysteresis loop. For<br />
comparison, figure 40(b) shows hysteresis loops obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
on a conductive SrRuO 3 /STO surface. This surface is<br />
extremely stable <strong>in</strong> air and conductive (i.e. low energy electron<br />
diffraction pattern can be observed after air exposure) [332]<br />
and no hysteresis loops are measured, thus confirm<strong>in</strong>g that<br />
the behavior observed on the STO (1 0 0) surface is not<br />
an <strong>in</strong>strumental artifact. While this observation is not<br />
necessarily universal, it does illustrate that spurious hysteretic<br />
contributions to electromechanical measurements can exist<br />
when operat<strong>in</strong>g under ambient conditions.<br />
4.2. Phenomenological theory of doma<strong>in</strong> loop formation<br />
The progress <strong>in</strong> experimental methods has stimulated parallel<br />
development of theoretical models to relate PFM hysteresis<br />
loop parameters and <strong>materials</strong> properties. A number of such<br />
models are based on the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of phenomenological<br />
40