27.10.2014 Views

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE QUICK COUNT AND ELECTION OBSERVATION<br />

Information Flows from the Field<br />

<strong>The</strong> experiences of groups that have conducted quick counts provide two very<br />

clear lessons about information flows, <strong>and</strong> each of these has important logistical<br />

<strong>and</strong> analytic implications that need to be clearly understood.<br />

First, on election day, there are very substantial fluctuations in the volume of<br />

information flows from observers in the field to the data collection center. <strong>The</strong><br />

typical pattern, summarized in Figure 7-1, is based on real data gathered from<br />

a recent Latin American election. In that particular case, the election law<br />

required that polling station officials open the polling stations by 7:00 a.m.<br />

Observers were asked to be present at the polling station by 6:15, some 45<br />

minutes before polling stations were due to open. <strong>The</strong>y were asked to report<br />

their Form 1 data, the qualitative data, immediately after the first voter had<br />

voted at their polling station.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are very substantial<br />

fluctuations in the<br />

volume of information<br />

flows from observers in<br />

the field to the data<br />

collection center.<br />

103<br />

50<br />

FIGURE 7-1:<br />

TYPICAL DISTRIBUTION OF<br />

PHONE CALLS<br />

Calls / 10 minutes<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

7:00 a.m.<br />

8:00 a.m.<br />

9:00 a.m. 10:00 a.m. 11:00 a.m.<br />

This pattern of fluctuations in the volumes of information is essentially the<br />

same for both the qualitative <strong>and</strong> the numeric data. At 7:00, the data collection<br />

center receives no information at all. Information begins to trickle in to<br />

the data collection center after the first thirty minutes, between 7:30 <strong>and</strong> 8:00.<br />

<strong>The</strong> earliest data to arrive come from the most efficient polling stations <strong>and</strong><br />

where observers have easy access to telephones. By 8:30, the number of phone<br />

calls into the data collection center has increased dramatically, <strong>and</strong> by 9:00<br />

that trickle has turned into a deluge. In this particular case, calls were arriving<br />

at the data collection center at a rate of some 55 calls per 10 minutes or 5.5<br />

calls a minute. After that peak period, the volume of calls coming into the data<br />

collection center starts to fall off, <strong>and</strong> then it slows down dramatically.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se uneven information flows present a logistical challenge. <strong>The</strong> task is to<br />

develop a strategy that anticipates—<strong>and</strong> then effectively manages—the peak<br />

volume of information intake. At issue are two questions. Does the group have<br />

the communications capacity to accept all the calls during the peak period?<br />

<strong>The</strong> task is to develop<br />

a strategy that effectively<br />

manages the<br />

peak volume of information<br />

intake.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!