The Quick Count and Election Observation
The Quick Count and Election Observation
The Quick Count and Election Observation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER FIVE: STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES AND QUICK COUNTS<br />
62 had a class of 10 or fewer students. More importantly, the grades of<br />
exceptionally good, or exceptionally poor, students will have quite a<br />
different impact on the average grade for the entire class. In a small<br />
class, those “outlier” grades will have a big impact on the overall distribution<br />
<strong>and</strong> on the class average; they will skew the results of the<br />
grade curve. But in a larger class, the impact of any individual exceptional<br />
grade will have a far smaller impact on the average mark for the<br />
whole class.<br />
<strong>The</strong> practical implication of the grade distribution example is simple: as the<br />
amount of data (number of observation points) increases, the impact of any<br />
one individual data point on the total result decreases.<br />
A second statistical principle that is vital to quick count methodology is known<br />
as the central limit theorem. This axiom holds that, the greater the number of<br />
observations (sample points), the more likely it is that the distribution of the<br />
data points will tend to conform to a known pattern. A class of 500 physics students<br />
in Brazil will produce the same grade distribution as a class of 300 literature<br />
students in France, even though the marks themselves may be different. In both<br />
cases, most of the data points will cluster around the average grade.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se two statistical axioms – the law of large numbers <strong>and</strong> the central limit<br />
theorem – work in conjunction with each other. Together they indicate that:<br />
<strong>The</strong> greater the number<br />
of observations we<br />
have, the more likely<br />
it is that we can make<br />
reliable statistical predictions<br />
about the<br />
characteristics of the<br />
population.<br />
1. the larger the number of observations (sample points), the less likely it<br />
is that any exceptional individual result will affect the average (law of<br />
large numbers); <strong>and</strong><br />
2. the greater the number of observations, the more likely it is that the<br />
dataset as a whole will produce a distribution of cases that corresponds<br />
to a normal curve (central limit theorem).<br />
A general principle follows from these statistical rules, one that has powerful<br />
implications for quick counts: the greater the number of observations we have,<br />
the more likely it is that we can make reliable statistical predictions about the<br />
characteristics of the population. However, it is absolutely crucial to underst<strong>and</strong><br />
that, for these two statistical principles to hold, the selection of the cases<br />
in the sample must be chosen r<strong>and</strong>omly.<br />
R<strong>and</strong>omness<br />
A sample can be thought of not just as a subset of a population, but as a miniature<br />
replica of the population from which it is drawn. <strong>The</strong> population of every<br />
country can be considered as unique in certain respects. No two countries are<br />
the same when it comes to how such characteristics as language, religion, gender,<br />
age, occupation <strong>and</strong> education are distributed in the population. Whether<br />
an individual possesses a car, or lives in a city rather than a town, or has a job,<br />
or owns a pet dog contributes to the uniqueness of personal experience. It is<br />
impossible to produce a definitive <strong>and</strong> exhaustive list of every single feature