27.10.2014 Views

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C H A P T E R E I G H T : T H E E N D G A M E<br />

124 director <strong>and</strong> designated members of the board of directors. Civic groups may<br />

take steps to ensure the security of quick count findings, including:<br />

• explaining to all headquarters staff who will, <strong>and</strong> will not, have access to<br />

quick count data;<br />

• banning all cell phones from headquarters on election night; <strong>and</strong><br />

• placing security guards at the main doors of the data collection center<br />

<strong>and</strong> at the analysis room.<br />

In discussing how to share quick count results with outside sources, groups<br />

should consider first the legal framework. Are there any requirements or restrictions<br />

regarding “going public” (i.e., releasing the information publicly or<br />

privately to others)? In some cases, election law prohibits the release of any<br />

results by any group prior to the public announcement of the official results<br />

by the election commission.<br />

Civic groups must also address the expectations of several groups <strong>and</strong> actors,<br />

including:<br />

• electoral authorities;<br />

• political contestants;<br />

• funders;<br />

• affiliated non-governmental organizations;<br />

• important civic <strong>and</strong> religious leaders;<br />

• international observer missions; <strong>and</strong><br />

• the diplomatic community.<br />

Many individuals or groups may request, or expect to have access to, quick<br />

count data. <strong>Quick</strong> count leaders must consider their responsibilities to each<br />

group, as well as advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages of sharing quick count results<br />

with them. For example, quick count organizers may acknowledge the legal<br />

obligation of election officials to provide accurate <strong>and</strong> timely election results,<br />

<strong>and</strong> they may feel obligated to allow reasonable amounts of time for this to<br />

take place before releasing quick count results. However, authorities should<br />

know that the group has completed an accurate quick count <strong>and</strong> is prepared<br />

to release results if fraud becomes apparent or an extended delay causes serious<br />

public concern. Political contestants have a right to an open, honest <strong>and</strong><br />

competent electoral process; quick count organizers have a responsibility to<br />

inform all of the contestants, without discrimination, of their findings, including<br />

apparent fraudulent practices that may affect election results.<br />

Funders may expect to receive quick count results. <strong>The</strong>refore, quick count<br />

organizers <strong>and</strong> funders should hold open discussions before election day about<br />

strategies for managing qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative quick count data. Finally,<br />

quick count organizers must evaluate the role that civic leaders, the diplomatic<br />

community <strong>and</strong> international observer groups can play in achieving electoral<br />

accountability <strong>and</strong> share quick count findings with them accordingly.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!