The Quick Count and Election Observation
The Quick Count and Election Observation
The Quick Count and Election Observation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE QUICK COUNT AND ELECTION OBSERVATION<br />
121<br />
CHAPTER EIGHT<br />
<strong>The</strong> “End Game”<br />
After promoting the quick count, building a volunteer network, training<br />
observers <strong>and</strong> setting up a data collection system, election day arrives.<br />
At headquarters, phones begin to ring, volunteers key in data, <strong>and</strong> analysts<br />
compile reports. At this point, organizers celebrate the technical success<br />
of the quick count. What is often underestimated, however, is the difficulty of<br />
the work that immediately follows—managing <strong>and</strong> releasing quick count results.<br />
<strong>The</strong> strategic use of quick count results is the most sensitive phase of the project.<br />
<strong>The</strong> “end game” can also be the most controversial aspect of a quick count.<br />
Who should have access to the qualitative information? Who should get the<br />
projected election results? When <strong>and</strong> how should the information be shared?<br />
This chapter suggests ways that groups might approach the end game. It<br />
describes a process for developing data use protocols, discusses the most common<br />
approaches to releasing results <strong>and</strong> describes specific activities that support<br />
a data use plan. This chapter concludes with a few words on how organizations<br />
that conduct successful quick counts work after elections to prepare for<br />
the future.<br />
<strong>The</strong> difficulty of managing<br />
<strong>and</strong> releasing quick<br />
count results is often<br />
underestimated.<br />
DEVELOPING A PROTOCOL FOR DATA USE<br />
Many successful groups hold a pre-election meeting or retreat at which leaders,<br />
key staff <strong>and</strong> advisors can develop a protocol for releasing quick count<br />
results. Experienced groups with a strong, cohesive leadership facing a fairly<br />
predictable electoral situation may need only a short time for such a meeting.<br />
However, new groups struggling with internal factions <strong>and</strong> confronting a murky<br />
<strong>and</strong> problematic election day may need an entire day in a confidential setting<br />
to reach consensus on how, when <strong>and</strong> with whom to share quick count results.<br />
In any case, groups usually proceed through several steps to arrive at a data<br />
use protocol. <strong>The</strong>y review the electoral context, revisit their original goals <strong>and</strong><br />
create a draft election-day schedule.