27.10.2014 Views

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER SEVEN: COLLECTING AND ANALYZING QUICK COUNT DATA<br />

104 More critically, are there information bottlenecks or breakdowns that could lead<br />

to information losses? Information losses are extremely serious for two reasons.<br />

Information bottlenecks<br />

or breakdowns<br />

could lead to information<br />

losses.<br />

First, they amount to an unnecessary waste of organizational time <strong>and</strong> effort.<br />

<strong>The</strong> practical issue is clear; there is no point in recruiting <strong>and</strong> training observers<br />

<strong>and</strong> asking them to report data if the communications system does not have the<br />

capacity to receive the data. Second, information losses mean that the effective<br />

size of the sample is reduced, <strong>and</strong> for reasons outlined in Chapter Five, it is clear<br />

that reducing effective sample size means increasing the margins of error of the<br />

quick count results. More technically, it means that the usable sample becomes<br />

a less reliable basis for estimating unknown population characteristics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> second lesson learned is that, on election day, information flows into the<br />

data center at uneven rates from different regions of most countries. (See Figure<br />

7-2.) <strong>The</strong>re is no mystery about why there are dramatic regional variations in<br />

information flows. Information from the capital cities nearly always arrives first,<br />

mostly because the communications infrastructure in capital cities is nearly<br />

always far better than in rural areas, <strong>and</strong> observer access to telephones is nearly<br />

always easier in capital cities than elsewhere. Information from rural <strong>and</strong><br />

remote areas, by contrast, are usually the last data to arrive because communications<br />

infrastructure is typically poor, <strong>and</strong> observers often have to travel great<br />

distances to reach telephones or radios. <strong>The</strong>se uneven regional distributions of<br />

information flows have both organizational <strong>and</strong> analytic implications.<br />

Because we know ahead of time that information flows are likely to be uneven<br />

in these two respects, it is important to take steps that will both maximize <strong>and</strong><br />

protect our effective sample by managing the information flows more efficiently.<br />

FIGURE 7-2:<br />

REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF<br />

INFORMATION FLOWS<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

Incoming Information<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

7 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.<br />

8:30 a.m. - 10 a.m. After 10 a.m.<br />

Capital City Urban Centers (outside capital) Rural Area

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!