27.10.2014 Views

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

The Quick Count and Election Observation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE QUICK COUNT AND ELECTION OBSERVATION<br />

81<br />

CHAPTER SIX<br />

<strong>The</strong> Qualitative<br />

Component of the<br />

<strong>Quick</strong> <strong>Count</strong><br />

In many election observations the final vote count attracts the most attention.<br />

This is entirely underst<strong>and</strong>able. <strong>The</strong> vote count determines election day<br />

winners <strong>and</strong> losers, <strong>and</strong> the integrity of that count is a longst<strong>and</strong>ing concern<br />

in many countries. <strong>The</strong> final count, however, is just one aspect of an election.<br />

No one doubts that an accurate, honest vote count is a necessary condition for<br />

a democratic election, but it is not a sufficient condition. Electoral outcomes<br />

too often have been rigged in ways that have little or nothing to do with the<br />

counting <strong>and</strong> tabulation of results. <strong>The</strong> will of the electorate has been nullified<br />

for example by: blocking legitimate c<strong>and</strong>idates <strong>and</strong> parties from appearing on<br />

the ballot; otherwise tilting electoral laws <strong>and</strong> regulations; financing campaigns<br />

illicitly, including through the improper use of state resources; preventing open<br />

<strong>and</strong> free campaigns; intimidating <strong>and</strong> bribing voters; using biased voter registration<br />

lists; interfering with the secrecy of the vote; manipulating the<br />

administration of the election <strong>and</strong> complaint mechanisms; <strong>and</strong> preventing legitimate<br />

winners from assuming office.<br />

For these reasons, election observers must concentrate on the quality of the<br />

electoral process before, during <strong>and</strong> after election day, <strong>and</strong> contemporary election<br />

observations should not depend on just impressionistic evidence of<br />

anecdotes. To be effective <strong>and</strong> credible, contemporary election observations<br />

should not depend on just impressionistic evidence or anecdotes. Anecdotal<br />

or impressionistic evidence is unreliable, <strong>and</strong> it leaves too many important<br />

questions unanswered. Qualitative problems in the process should be quantified<br />

as much as possible so that their impact can be characterized appropriately.<br />

For example, if unused ballots have been tampered with then there is surely<br />

a cause for concern. But the more important questions include: How widespread<br />

was this problem? Did the tampering work in favor of one party to the<br />

detriment of others? Was the tampering part of a larger scheme aimed at interfering<br />

with the outcome of the election? <strong>The</strong> only sure way to answer these<br />

<strong>Election</strong> observers<br />

must concentrate on<br />

the quality of the<br />

electoral process<br />

before, during <strong>and</strong><br />

after election day.<br />

Contemporary election<br />

observations should<br />

not depend on just<br />

impressionistic evidence<br />

or anecdotes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!