31.10.2014 Views

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 RETAINING WALL<br />

7.5.1 Sliding/Translational Stability<br />

The horizontal component of all lateral pressures tends to cause the wall to slide along the base of<br />

the wall (or along any horizontal section of a gravity <strong>and</strong> crib wall). If the passive resistance is<br />

neglected, the sliding force along the bottom of the wall is resisted by a horizontal force which<br />

consists of friction, adhesion or a combination of both. If the bottom of base slab is rough, as the<br />

case of concrete poured directly on soil, the coefficient of friction is equal to tan φ', (φ' is the angle<br />

of internal friction of the soil). Typical coefficients of friction are as follows:<br />

Course-grained (without silt) 0.55<br />

Course-grained (with silt) 0.45<br />

Silt 0.35<br />

Sound rock (with rough surface) 0.60<br />

For cohesive soils the adhesion between the base slab <strong>and</strong> the soil is assumed to be equal to the<br />

cohesive strength of the clay <strong>and</strong> φ is assumed to be zero. The designer should consider the<br />

possibility of reduction in cohesive strength due to construction works such as excavation, exposure<br />

to surface water etc. If the retaining wall is supported on piles, the entire vertical <strong>and</strong> horizontal load<br />

should be assumed to be carried by piles. No frictional resistance <strong>and</strong> no adhesion should be<br />

assigned along the base slab.<br />

For checking the sliding factor of safety, the live load surcharge is usually not considered in the<br />

stabilising forces over the heel of the wall. Also, the passive resistance of the soil in front of the wall<br />

is commonly neglected in the stability analysis. If it is included in the computation, as in the case<br />

where the toe of wall is covered by a large depth of soil, its value should be reduced to take care of<br />

the high potential of the soil to be removed by erosion, future excavation, <strong>and</strong> tension cracks in<br />

cohesive soils.<br />

The minimum safety factor for sliding/translational stability shall be of minimum 1.5. The sliding<br />

stability can be increase by either increasing the overall weight of the retaining wall or providing<br />

sufficient passive lateral resistance of the wall. This can be done by introducing a wider base,<br />

construction of structural shear key <strong>and</strong> incorporating deep foundation support.<br />

7.5.2 Overturning Stability<br />

The lateral pressure due to the backfill <strong>and</strong> surcharge tends to tip the retaining over about its toe.<br />

This overturning moment is stabilised by the weight of the wall <strong>and</strong> the weight of the soil above the<br />

base of the wall. The overturning stability of the wall is always the most critical potential mode of<br />

failure when the walls are underlain by weak soils. The minimum factor of safety against overturning<br />

is:<br />

F s =<br />

Sum of stabilizing moment<br />

Sum of overturning moment<br />

≥2.0<br />

To overcome the overturning stability, normally pile foundation is recommended. For some cases,<br />

ground improvement such as removal <strong>and</strong> replacement is adopted to increase the bearing capacity of<br />

the ground (provided the soft bearing ground is relatively thin).<br />

For passive resistance of the soil in front of the wall, designer should evaluate whether to ignore or<br />

to use a reduced value basing on the reason discussed in 7.5.1 above.<br />

March 2009 7-19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!