31.10.2014 Views

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3 IN-SITU GEOTECHNICAL TESTING<br />

In a comparative study based upon case records, Dikran found that the ratio of calculated/observed<br />

settlements fell in the range 0.21—2.72, for four traditional methods of calculation using the CPT.<br />

For the SPT the variation was 0.15—10.8.<br />

When calculating the point resistance of piles in s<strong>and</strong> based upon cone resistance, it is normal to<br />

consider the static cone penetrometer as a model of the pile, <strong>and</strong> simply apply a reduction factor of<br />

between two <strong>and</strong> six to give allowable bearing pressure (Van der Veen <strong>and</strong> Boersma 1957; Sanglerat<br />

1972). S<strong>and</strong> deposits are rarely uniform, <strong>and</strong> so an averaging procedure is used with the q c values<br />

immediately above <strong>and</strong> below the proposed pile tip position (Schmertmann 1978). The side friction<br />

of piles may be calculated directly from the side friction of the cone, or by correlation with cone<br />

resistance.<br />

In cohesive soils, the CPT is routinely used to determine both undrained shear strength <strong>and</strong><br />

compressibility. In a similar way to the bearing capacity of a foundation, cone resistance is a function<br />

of both overburden pressure (σ v ) <strong>and</strong> undrained shear strength (c u ):<br />

q c = N k C u +σ v (3.8)<br />

so that the undrained shear strength may be calculated from:<br />

c u = q c -σ v<br />

N k<br />

(3.9)<br />

provided that N k is known, or can be estimated. The theoretical bearing capacity factor for deep<br />

foundation failure cannot be applied in this equation because the cone shears the soil more rapidly<br />

than other tests, <strong>and</strong> the soil is failed very much more quickly than in a field situation such as an<br />

embankment failure.<br />

At shallow depths, or in heavily over-consolidated soils, the vertical total stress in the soil is small, so<br />

that:<br />

c u q c<br />

N k<br />

(3.10)<br />

Typically, in these conditions, the undrained shear strength is about 1/15th to 1/20th of the cone<br />

resistance.<br />

N k is not a constant, but depends upon cone type, soil type, overconsolidation ratio, degree of<br />

cementing, <strong>and</strong> the method by which undrained shear strength has been measured (because<br />

undrained shear strength is sample-size <strong>and</strong> test-method dependent). The N k value in an overconsolidated<br />

clay will be higher than in the same clay when normally consolidated<br />

Typically, N k varies from 10 to 20. Lunne <strong>and</strong> Kleven have shown that this variation is significantly<br />

reduced, giving N k much closer on average to 15, if a correction (N k * = N k /µ) is made to allow for<br />

rate effects, in a similar way to that proposed by Bjerrum for the vane test (see below), but this is<br />

rarely done in practice.<br />

3.3 FIELD VANE SHEAR TEST (VST)<br />

The vane shear test (VST), or field vane (FV), is used to evaluate the in-place undrained shear<br />

strength (s uv ) of soft to stiff clays & silts at regular depth intervals of 1 meter (3.28 feet). The test<br />

consists of inserting a four-bladed vane into the clay <strong>and</strong> rotating the device about a vertical axis.<br />

Limit equilibrium analysis is used to relate the measured peak torque to the calculated value of s u .<br />

Both the peak <strong>and</strong> remoulded strengths can be measured; their ratio is termed the sensitivity, S t . A<br />

March 2009 3-15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!