31.10.2014 Views

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

Volume 6 – Geotechnical Manual, Site Investigation and Engineering ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PROCESS<br />

2.2.2 Decide on Appropriate <strong>Geotechnical</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong><br />

The objectives <strong>and</strong> various general details on the type of geotechnical investigation works are<br />

described in Part 2, <strong>Volume</strong> 6 : Soil <strong>Investigation</strong> which include both field <strong>and</strong> laboratory works.<br />

Suffice here to mention that the composition <strong>and</strong> amount of geotechnical investigation proposed<br />

shall be able to provide sufficient data on the ground, groundwater conditions at the proposed site<br />

<strong>and</strong> proper description of the essential soil properties for geotechnical design <strong>and</strong> construction. It<br />

shall also be planned to take into account the construction <strong>and</strong> performance requirements of the<br />

proposed structure.<br />

Very often geotechnical engineer is required to determine the type of soil investigation works in<br />

relation to the envisage analysis required in the design works, i.e. the long-term (drained with<br />

effective stress analysis) or short-term analysis (undrained total stress analysis) conditions.<br />

2.2.3 Interpret <strong>Geotechnical</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong> Result to Obtain Representative<br />

Parameters/Properties<br />

The evaluation <strong>and</strong> interpretation of geotechnical investigation work shall include a review of the<br />

field <strong>and</strong> laboratory results to derive at the reasonable <strong>and</strong> representative parameters <strong>and</strong><br />

properties. This normally involves tabulation <strong>and</strong> graphical presentation of field <strong>and</strong> laboratory<br />

results such as the range <strong>and</strong> distribution of values of the required soil parameters (including<br />

ground water condition), subsurface strata profile which differentiate <strong>and</strong> group the various<br />

formations <strong>and</strong> properties. Any irregularities or adverse field <strong>and</strong> laboratory results shall be pointed<br />

out, commented upon, <strong>and</strong> if necessary to propose further geotechnical investigation for<br />

verification. Reader should refer to Part 2 <strong>Volume</strong> 6 for more detail <strong>and</strong> comprehensive information<br />

on this topic.<br />

In spite of the many advances in geotechnical engineering theory, there are still many uncertainties<br />

in the analysis <strong>and</strong> design due mainly to the highly variable, heterogeneous <strong>and</strong> anisotropic nature<br />

of soil material. Designer normally use various investigation <strong>and</strong> testing techniques to determine the<br />

soil conditions, however even the most thorough investigation program encounters only a small<br />

portion of the soils <strong>and</strong> relies heavily on the interpolation <strong>and</strong> extrapolation. The most practical<br />

approach to solve geotechnical design issues is to combine the sources of information gathered<br />

through soil investigation <strong>and</strong> testing program, established theory developed to predict the behavior<br />

of soils <strong>and</strong> experience obtained from previous projects coupled with sound engineering judgment.<br />

These approaches are depicted in Figure 2.3<br />

March 2009 2-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!