14.11.2014 Views

A grammar of the Homeric dialect - Wilbourhall.org

A grammar of the Homeric dialect - Wilbourhall.org

A grammar of the Homeric dialect - Wilbourhall.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266.]<br />

THE RELATIVE. 235<br />

<strong>the</strong> Correlation ws ws as so. A single<br />

s tlirtov, &c. :<br />

cp. <strong>the</strong> Latin guae quum diosisset, &c. The<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r instances in which we have to translate cos as a Demonstrative<br />

are rare :<br />

e.g. II. 3. 339 &s ' avr&s and in like manner,<br />

Among Demonstrative uses <strong>of</strong> os it is usual to count <strong>the</strong> use<br />

with ydp, as os yap, o>s yap, %va yap. This however is an error,<br />

arising from <strong>the</strong> occasional use <strong>of</strong> yap where it cannot be translated<br />

for: see 348, 3.<br />

Some commentators find a Demonstrative os in<br />

Od. 4. 388 rov y' (i TTcas av Svvaio \oxf}ffafj.fvos XzXafitadai,<br />

os Ktv TOI fiTrgaw u86v KT\.<br />

Here however <strong>the</strong> clause os KW rot KT\. is not <strong>the</strong> Apodosis, but a Relative<br />

Clause expressing purpose. The peculiarity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> passage is 7 merely that <strong>the</strong><br />

Apodosis is left to be understood : if you can seize him, (do so), that he may tell<br />

you &c. :<br />

cp. Od. 5. if., 10. 539.<br />

These idioms are usually regarded as <strong>the</strong> remains <strong>of</strong> an earlier<br />

use <strong>of</strong> os in <strong>the</strong> simple Anaphoric sense. The growth <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Relative out <strong>of</strong> a Demonstrative has been already exemplified in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Article ( 262). But <strong>the</strong> Relatival use <strong>of</strong> os is so ancient<br />

that any attempt to trace its growth from an earlier syntax must<br />

be <strong>of</strong> very uncertain value.<br />

266.] os re, os ns. The simple os may be used in any kind <strong>of</strong><br />

Relative Clause, although in certain cases ( 262) <strong>the</strong> Article is<br />

preferred. Thus we have<br />

II. 4. 196 ov ris di'o-rewas Zj3a\v (a particular fact).<br />

I.<br />

403 bv B/oia/oeow KaAe'ouo-i (a constant, characteristic fact).<br />

In <strong>the</strong>se two places <strong>the</strong> Art. might be put in place <strong>of</strong> os but<br />

:<br />

not in<br />

II. 2. 205 els j3ao-L\vs, o> e8o>Ke (a characteristic fact, defining).<br />

I. 21 8 09 K 0eots TTL77idr]TaL (definition <strong>of</strong> a class).<br />

So os is used to convey a reason (which implies a general cause<br />

or tendency)<br />

: as Od. i.<br />

348 Zevs amos os re 6t8coo-tz/ KT\. ; cp.<br />

II. 2. 275., 5. 650., 8. 34.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> Relative is meant to refer to an indefinite number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals falling under a common description, os TIS is generally<br />

used, = wtio being any one, whoever.<br />

again, <strong>the</strong> Relative Clause generalises by making us think,<br />

If,<br />

not so much <strong>of</strong> all possible individuals in a class, as <strong>of</strong> different<br />

times and circumstances, in o<strong>the</strong>r words, if it lays stress on <strong>the</strong><br />

general and permanent element in facts os re is used e. : g.<br />

II. I.<br />

279 oTK/77iro{5)(os /3ar7tAev?, w re Zevs Kvbos eSco/ce to whom<br />

as king, to whom in every such case.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!