Volume 2 - Atomic Energy Regulatory Board

(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
(p)
Slug(s) is missing or rolled from the hot cell table
Heavy contamination of hot cell, contamination of pool water pool
High activity of gaseous waste discharge in air
Failure of access door interlocks
Fire in the IFRT
Failure of ventilation system
Failure of power supply
Failure of PLC
Earthquake at the IFRT site
Flooding of hot cell with water
Leakage of water from pool
Breakage of pool lining
Fall of person in the water pool
The designer/manufacturer shall carry out such analysis to demonstrate means
provided to prevent and handle above situations safely.
14. Acceptance test reports after installation of safety systems:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Dose rate profile measurement in the entire facility, strength of
radiation source.
Performance of radiation monitoring and control interlocks
Performance of personnel monitors
Dose concentration measurement with and without ventilation fan
functioning
Assurance and effectiveness of control functions and interlocks
Sketch of the facility and location of dose rate monitoring points and
maximum/minimum dose rate levels should include :
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Name of persons carrying out the measurement
Instrument used in the radiation survey
Confidence limits of radiation level measurements
Background radiation levels in each location of measurement
15. Decommissioning of IFRT:
Procedure to be followed when decision is made to close down the facility
permanently.
217