Appendix C10 Estero Municipal Improvement District/Foster City
Estero Municipal Improvement District <strong>Water</strong> Service Area 1 DSS Input Sheet FINAL INPUT SHEET Base Year Average Use and Indoor Percentages by Billing Category for DSS Model 2 Single Family Multifamily Commercial/Institutional Industrial Irrigation Fire New Commercial/Institutional New Single Family Year Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor Average, gpd/a Indoor 2001 320 68% 678 84% 2250 86% 1900 79% 3000 0% 750 17% 4000 86% 450 68% Data for DSS Model - - Base Year 2001 NOTES Total SF + MF units = 12,009 1. - Communities served (includes all or portions of) Foster City and San Mateo according to BAWUA survey Population and Household Size in Census 2000 for Foster City 2 - Average gpd/a is based on a 12-month moving average through December 2001. Indoor use is based on average of 2 lowest consecutive months in the winter if meters read bimonthly, or single lowest month if meters read monthly. 4 - Total water Purchased (produced) taken from BAWUA for Fiscal Year 2001-2002 or agency if provided. Estimated Residential City of Foster City City of Foster City Service Area Census Population Estimated Population Population Reconcile agency account billing data and census data Number of <strong>Water</strong> Use <strong>Water</strong> Use, Total Dwelling Units in Census 2000 for Foster City Category Accounts 2001 MGD Use Profile <strong>Water</strong> Use Indoor <strong>Water</strong> Use FY. 2001 3 gpd/a 2 2001 Percent gcd gcd Single Family 4,698 320 1.50 27.65% 115 77 Multifamily 2,692 678 1.83 33.57% 85 71 Service Area Billing Difference between Commercial/Instituti 215 2,250 0.48 8.90% Accounts - Year 2000 billing and census Industrial 68 1,900 0.13 2.38% Single family 2000 Units No. Buildings 3 data Data Sources / Notes Irrigation 484 3,000 1.45 26.71% 1-detached 4,808 4,808 Fire 58 750 0.04 0.80% Subtotal 4,808 4,808 4,698 -110 Housing Characteristics from U.S. Census Bureau New Commercial/Ins 1 4,000 0.00 0.00% Multi family New Single Family 1 450 0.00 0.00% 1-attached 2,464 2,464 Total 8,217 5.44 100.00% 2-units 24 12 Total <strong>Water</strong> Purchased (produced) 4 = 5.79 MGD 3-4 units 743 212 Unaccounted For <strong>Water</strong> (UFW) 5 = 6% Percent From 5 year BAWUA Survey average 5 to 9 units 614 88 Estimated UFW for DSS Model = 7% Percent 7% if actual is < 7%, otherwise = E25 10-19 units 810 54 <strong>Water</strong> Produced for use in DSS Model 5.82 MGD Add UFW to Total <strong>Water</strong> Use 20 or more units 2,539 51 Meter for assumed 50 units per building Peaking Factor 1.59 Provided by Agency or <strong>SFPUC</strong> <strong>Water</strong> Master Plan (or NA) mobile homes 7 0 Meter for mobile home parks, assume 50 per park Peaking Factor for DSS Model= 1.59 If NA use default value of 1.6. Subtotal 7,201 2,881 2,692 -189 Must be more than one building on an MF meter. - Yellow cells are input to DSS Model MF Average = 2.5 units/building 2.7 units/account Units include all multi-family dwellings plus the "1-attached" dwellings. 3 - Number of accounts is from data provided by water agency for this project (see worksheet with account data in this file) 5 - Unaccounted for <strong>Water</strong> (UFW) is the percent difference between the total water purchased and the total water use. 6 - For reference see additional population estimates provided in population and employment estimates corresponding to service area table. Data Sources / Notes 2000 2001 2001 Estimated growth from 2000 to 2001 (CA DOF <strong>Projections</strong>): 0.51% Total Population from Census data 6 = 31,876 32039 Estimated employment growth from 2000 to 2001 (ABAG Employment <strong>Projections</strong>): 0.94% Subtract Institutionalized Population = 67 67 <strong>Water</strong> use for the institutionalized population is accounted for in nonresidential billing categories Residential Population = 31,809 31,971 Residential population shown corresponds to the city or cities represented by Census data Avg. HHS 7 = 2.65 MF Pop @ MF HHS 7 = 2.70 19,443 19,542 21,439 61.1% Percent of Population that is MF SF Pop = 12,366 12,429 13,129 38.9% Percent of Population that is SF 7 - Initial estimate based on census data for renter occupied units. For reference see table below that has 2000 census data for corresponding water SF HHS 7 = 2.57 service area city or cities. Total 34,568 100.0% 2000 Census Data 183 Difference in our estimate and average of 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 BAWUA Surveys Average household size 2.47 116 Difference in our estimate and the average 2000-2001 and 2001-2002 BAWUA Surveys including institutionalized population Average household size of owner-occupied unit 2.64 Average household size of renter-occupied unit 2.21 Estimate Service Area Dwelling Units for 2001 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) 0.30 SF Res 4,833 Equals No. Buildings from cell M21 plus growth in accounts for one year from cell T38 Rental vacancy rate (percent) 2.60 MF Res 7,940 Equals billing accounts in 2001 from cell C16 times average units per account in cell N30 (or average units per building in cell L30 to minimize population difference in cell N47) Population and Employment Estimates Corresponding to Service Area Population Employment 2000 Census data for jurisdiction 31,876 NA 2000 ABAG (jurisdictional) 28,803 20,180 2005 ABAG Projection (jurisdictional) 29,900 21,130 2000 ABAG (subregional) 28,803 20,180 Data Prepared : August 15, 2003 By: B. Skeens 2005 ABAG Projection (subregional) 29,900 21,130 Revised: February 3, 2004 2000 Department of Finance Benchmark 28,803 From State of California Department of Finance (DOF) table E-4 as of 4-1-2000. Website www.dof.ca.gov 2001 Department of Finance Estimate 28,950 From State of California Department of Finance table E-4 as of 1-1-2001. Website www.dof.ca.gov 2002 Department of Finance Estimate 28,800 From State of California Department of Finance table E-4 as of 1-1-2002. Website www.dof.ca.gov FY 2000-2001 BAWUA service area 34,385 NA FY 2001-2002 BAWUA service area 34,385 NA 2001 Employment in Service Area (input to DSS Model) = 24,318 Service Area Employment is determined by the ratio of the 2000-2001 BAWUA service area population to the 2000 ABAG Subregional Population and escalated to 2001 using the assumed growth rate in cell T39. Definitions / Abbreviations ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments MF multi family BAWUA Bay Area <strong>Water</strong> Users Association MGD million gallons per day DSS Decision Support System Model No. number du dwelling unit Pop population FY Fiscal Year Res residential gpd/a gallons per day / per account SF single family gpd gallons per day UFW unaccounted for water HHS household size DOF California Department of Finance
- Page 1 and 2:
San Francisco Public Utilities Comm
- Page 3 and 4:
List of Tables, Figures, and Append
- Page 5 and 6:
List of Tables, Figures, and Append
- Page 7 and 8:
Glossary Account Average gal/day/ac
- Page 9 and 10:
Executive Summary INTRODUCTION In F
- Page 11 and 12:
Section 1 Introduction
- Page 13 and 14:
SECTIONONE Introduction retail serv
- Page 15 and 16:
SECTIONONE Introduction 1.3 GENERAL
- Page 17 and 18:
Section 2 Approach to Developing Wa
- Page 19 and 20:
SECTIONTWO Approach to Developing W
- Page 21 and 22:
SECTIONTWO Approach to Developing W
- Page 23 and 24:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 25 and 26:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 27 and 28:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 29 and 30:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 31 and 32:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 33 and 34:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 35 and 36:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 37 and 38:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 39 and 40:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 41 and 42:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 43 and 44:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 45 and 46:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 47 and 48:
SECTIONTHREE Establishing Base - Ye
- Page 49 and 50:
Section 4 Water Demand Forecasting
- Page 51 and 52:
SECTIONFOUR Water Demand Forecastin
- Page 53 and 54:
SECTIONFOUR Water Demand Forecastin
- Page 55 and 56:
SECTIONFOUR Water Demand Forecastin
- Page 57 and 58: Section 5 Water Demand Projections
- Page 59 and 60: SECTIONFIVE Water Demand Projection
- Page 61 and 62: SECTIONFIVE Water Demand Projection
- Page 63 and 64: Section 6 References
- Page 65 and 66: SECTIONSIX References Hayward, City
- Page 67 and 68: Appendix A Description of SFPUC Who
- Page 69 and 70: Appendix A Description of SFPUC Who
- Page 71 and 72: Appendix A Description of SFPUC Who
- Page 73 and 74: Appendix B Summary of Customer-Spec
- Page 75 and 76: Wholesale Customer Estero MID/Foste
- Page 77 and 78: Wholesale Customer Milpitas, City o
- Page 79 and 80: Appendix B Summary of Customer-Spec
- Page 81 and 82: Appendix C1 Alameda County Water Di
- Page 83 and 84: 66.0 64.0 62.0 60.0 58.0 56.0 54.0
- Page 85 and 86: City of Brisbane Water Service Area
- Page 87 and 88: Appendix C3 Burlingame, City of
- Page 89 and 90: 5.00 4.95 4.90 4.85 4.80 4.75 4.70
- Page 91 and 92: Cal Water Bear Gulch Water Service
- Page 93 and 94: Appendix C5 California Water Servic
- Page 95 and 96: 18.40 18.20 18.00 17.80 17.60 17.40
- Page 97 and 98: Cal Water South San Francisco (SSF)
- Page 99 and 100: Appendix C7 Coastside County Water
- Page 101 and 102: 4 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2
- Page 103 and 104: City of Daly City Water Service Are
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix C9 East Palo Alto, City of
- Page 107: 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 City of
- Page 111 and 112: Appendix C11 Guadalupe Valley Munic
- Page 113 and 114: 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Guadalu
- Page 115 and 116: Base Year Average Use and Indoor Pe
- Page 117 and 118: Appendix C13 Hillsborough, Town of
- Page 119 and 120: 4.00 3.90 3.80 3.70 3.60 3.50 Town
- Page 121 and 122: Los Trancos Woods Northern, Blue Oa
- Page 123 and 124: Appendix C15 Menlo Park, City of
- Page 125 and 126: 5.2 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.4 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.6
- Page 127 and 128: Mid Peninsula (Belmont) Water Servi
- Page 129 and 130: Appendix C17 Millbrae, City of
- Page 131 and 132: 3.7 3.65 3.6 3.55 3.5 3.45 3.4 3.35
- Page 133 and 134: City of Milpitas Water Service Area
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix C19 Mountain View, City of
- Page 137 and 138: 15 14.9 14.8 14.7 14.6 14.5 14.4 14
- Page 139 and 140: North Coast County WD Water Service
- Page 141 and 142: Appendix C21 Palo Alto, City of
- Page 143 and 144: 15.5 15.0 14.5 14.0 13.5 City of Pa
- Page 145 and 146: Purissima Hills Water District Serv
- Page 147 and 148: Appendix C23 Redwood City, City of
- Page 149 and 150: 14.5 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 11.5
- Page 151 and 152: City of San Bruno Water Service Are
- Page 153 and 154: Appendix C25 San Jose, City of (por
- Page 155 and 156: 7 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 6.4 6.3 6.2 6
- Page 157 and 158: City of Santa Clara Water Service A
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix C27 Skyline County Water D
- Page 161 and 162:
0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 Skyline Co
- Page 163 and 164:
Stanford University Water Service A
- Page 165 and 166:
Appendix C29 Sunnyvale, City of
- Page 167 and 168:
28.0 27.0 26.0 25.0 24.0 23.0 City
- Page 169 and 170:
Westborough County Water District S
- Page 171 and 172:
Appendix D Summary of SFPUC Wholesa
- Page 173 and 174:
Appendix D Summary of SFPUC Wholesa
- Page 175:
Appendix D Summary of SFPUC Wholesa