28.12.2014 Views

SFPUC Wholesale Customer Water Demand Projections ... - BAWSCA

SFPUC Wholesale Customer Water Demand Projections ... - BAWSCA

SFPUC Wholesale Customer Water Demand Projections ... - BAWSCA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTIONTHREE<br />

Establishing Base - Year Conditions<br />

Fixture models are used for two purposes:<br />

• To model the base-year water use, accounting for and reconciling the fixture data to what the<br />

current level of efficiency is in the homes and businesses, and<br />

• To forecast the impact of replacing the current inefficient fixtures with more efficient models<br />

over time in existing base-year accounts and in new accounts. These replacements result in<br />

water savings that are incorporated into the demand projections and are discussed in Section<br />

4 of this report.<br />

For this study, a typical model has up to 8 fixture models. The number of fixture models applied<br />

is related to the number of applicable customer-billing categories for each wholesale customer.<br />

Table 3-7<br />

<strong>SFPUC</strong> <strong>Wholesale</strong> <strong>Customer</strong> Average User per Non-Residential Account (2001)<br />

<strong>Wholesale</strong> <strong>Customer</strong><br />

Number of Non-<br />

Residential Accounts<br />

2001 DSS (Base<br />

Year) Employment<br />

Users per Non-<br />

Residential Account<br />

Alameda County <strong>Water</strong> District 5,263 151,092 28.71<br />

Brisbane, City of 121 3,789 31.31<br />

Burlingame, City of 1,278 31,205 24.42<br />

CWS - Bear Gulch District 1,414 42,899 30.34<br />

CWS - Mid Peninsula District 3,752 79,493 21.19<br />

CWS - South San Francisco District 2,202 49,288 22.38<br />

Coastside County <strong>Water</strong> District 394 5,402 13.71<br />

Daly City, City of 859 26,941 31.36<br />

East Palo Alto, City of 276 3,289 11.92<br />

Estero MID/Foster City 825 24,318 29.48<br />

Guadalupe Valley MID 44 4,442 100.95<br />

Hayward, City of 3,853 87,473 22.70<br />

Hillsborough, Town of 19 1,216 64.00<br />

Los Trancos County <strong>Water</strong> District 0 NA 1 NA 1<br />

Menlo Park, City of 517 10,053 19.44<br />

Mid-Peninsula <strong>Water</strong> District 606 14,705 24.27<br />

Millbrae, City of 387 6,664 17.22<br />

Milpitas, City of 1,508 53,566 35.52<br />

Mountain View, City of 2,350 75,629 32.18<br />

North Coast County <strong>Water</strong> District 423 5,797 13.70<br />

Palo Alto, City of 2,226 105,432 47.36<br />

Purissima Hills <strong>Water</strong> District 527 420 0.80<br />

Redwood City, City of 1,771 66,389 37.49<br />

San Bruno, City of 821 16,622 20.25<br />

San Jose, City of (portion of north San Jose) 621 2,500 4.03<br />

Santa Clara, City of 3,862 138,163 35.77<br />

Skyline County <strong>Water</strong> District 10 224 22.40<br />

Stanford University 199 NA 1 NA 1<br />

Sunnyvale, City of 4,464 125,476 28.11<br />

Westborough <strong>Water</strong> District 334 1,610 4.82<br />

Source: DSS Input Sheet<br />

1 Employment numbers and users per Non-Residential account are not applicable for LTCWD and Stanford University. LTCWD only has<br />

residential accounts. Users per account or employment numbers were not used to forecast Non-Residential account growth for Stanford<br />

University, other parameters such as increase in building square footage increase were used.<br />

NA - Not Applicable<br />

CWS - California <strong>Water</strong> Service (Company)<br />

MID - Municipal Improvement District<br />

3-19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!