29.12.2014 Views

foir_3880

foir_3880

foir_3880

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FOI-R--<strong>3880</strong>--SE<br />

This study illustrates some of the factors at play as of mid-2013 and is in a sense<br />

a snapshot from that time. The interaction dynamics between Afghanistan and<br />

Central Asia are evolving continuously, and so is the outside world. One clear<br />

example is Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in March 2014. It is likely to<br />

influence both Russia – how Russia relates to Central Asia and the world – and<br />

how former Soviet republics in Central Asia view Russia. As of June 2014, the<br />

full effects of the Crimea crisis remain to be seen.<br />

In this report each author writes in his or her own name and capacity as an expert<br />

and with due regard to their respective realities. They have consequently chosen<br />

different approaches. The report includes both traditional research texts and<br />

opinion pieces. As editors, we welcomed different types of contributions. The<br />

important point is that these are opinions stemming from those who will remain<br />

in the realities of Central Asia when Western countries leave Afghanistan. It is,<br />

after all, their countries that will have to live with the region’s evolving security<br />

challenges. Inevitably, some of the contributions overlap to some extent.<br />

Researchers from the Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI) developed the<br />

overall approach for the study and co-organised the workshop in Almaty in May<br />

2013 together with Al-Farabi University. FOI has also been responsible for<br />

translating and editing the Russian texts into English as well as editing the final<br />

report. As for the actual content of the report, FOI researchers are responsible for<br />

the framework. This included the report’s introduction, the introduction to each<br />

of the sections, and the summaries appearing at the top of each chapter as well as<br />

the final discussion and the overall conclusions.<br />

Terminology and limitations<br />

What is Central Asia History and today’s geopolitics provide a range of<br />

different geographical interpretations. There are many cross-border relations and<br />

influencing factors around Afghanistan. For this report, however, we and our<br />

authors agree that the term Central Asia means the five former Soviet republics<br />

that gained independence in 1991: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan,<br />

Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.<br />

Afghanistan is obviously a key factor in this report and has close geographical,<br />

historical, ethnic and cultural proximity to Central Asia. The focus is, however,<br />

on security issues related to Afghanistan. Other aspects such as ethnic and<br />

cultural ties and history are touched upon when they relate to the discussion<br />

about security. For the purposes of this report, however, our definition of Central<br />

Asia makes Afghanistan an outside actor.<br />

As for international forces in Afghanistan, the authors refer to the foreign troops<br />

in different ways. Terms like ‘NATO’, ‘the West’, ‘American’ or ‘the coalition<br />

forces’ all refer to the NATO-led ISAF, which has operated with a UN mandate<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!