foir_3880
foir_3880
foir_3880
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FOI-R--<strong>3880</strong>--SE<br />
ISLAMISM, EXTREMISM AND THE XUAR<br />
For the Chinese government the threat of extremism, terrorism and separatist<br />
movements striving for an independent XUAR is of key concern. The continued<br />
cohesion of the People’s Republic of China is not only a question of state<br />
integrity but it is also directly linked to the Communist Party’s claim to power.<br />
Any movement or group striving to decouple the XUAR from China poses a<br />
direct challenge to Party legitimacy and cannot be tolerated.<br />
The problems in the XUAR are not new and precede any current policy<br />
initiatives related to the western neighbourhood. The fears of revolts and<br />
invasions emanating from tribes and nations in Central Asia run back centuries.<br />
During Soviet times large scale military defence was a primary prism through<br />
which Beijing viewed its western territory. With the end of the Soviet Union the<br />
need to focus on large scale military defence in Xinjiang disappeared. Instead<br />
initiating relations with new neighbours became a focus. The rise of Islamist<br />
inspired movements as a result of the Afghan wars, especially the Taliban, would<br />
increasingly influence policy formulation vis-à-vis the region from the mid<br />
1990’s and onwards. Chinese authorities see unrest, for example the 2009 riots in<br />
Urumqi, as proof that Islamist ideology if not jihad fighters, are being exported<br />
from hot spots in Central Asia to XUAR (Lee 2009a) and act accordingly. Since<br />
2013 concerns about extreme Islamism have become more pressing for Chinese<br />
authorities. This is not only due to escalating violence in the XUAR but also<br />
because violent attacks have been launched in other parts of China. In the eyes of<br />
the authorities the risk of an expansion of conservative Islamic and violent prone<br />
ideology across ethnic divides is a very worrying trend.<br />
A two-pronged approach has been taken internally. First, the party has drawn the<br />
conclusion that economic development is the key instrument in promoting party<br />
legitimacy (Pantucci and Petersen, 2013). Thus if the west of the country can be<br />
developed it will be “won”. Content people with jobs and income have no reason<br />
to challenge the system. Thus China launched a “Go West” policy around 1999<br />
when Jiang Zemin proclaimed that the Central Committee had endorsed a<br />
development program for Western China (Lee, 2009b). The focus was on<br />
infrastructure projects with the aim of drawing the west into and linking it with<br />
the eastern trade flows. Yet progress during the first ten years was not as hoped<br />
for with the western regions lagging behind and attention still focused on the<br />
more prosperous foreign trade flowing out of the East. In 2010 a renewal of the<br />
Go West policy was attempted, possibly in the light of growing discontent in<br />
China (Moxley, 2010). The second internal response has been to tighten security<br />
and this is where China has seen the need to revamp its relationship with its<br />
western neighbours.<br />
Thus, internal Chinese threat perceptions have come to shape and influence<br />
relations with the neighbouring states of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tadzhikistan<br />
and Pakistan. From this perspective the formation of the SCO and its early focus<br />
87