foir_3880
foir_3880
foir_3880
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FOI-R--<strong>3880</strong>--SE<br />
Summary<br />
The aim of this report is to provide perspectives from Afghanistan, Central Asia,<br />
China and Russia about future regional security in Central Asia in the light of the<br />
withdrawal of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) and<br />
to discuss its implications. The study deals with some long term security factors<br />
as of mid-2013. It will therefore not deal with the implications of Russia’s<br />
aggression against Ukraine 2014 and how it may affect Russia and how it<br />
interacts with Central Asia and the world.<br />
This report has four main conclusions. First, in the spring 2014 as ISAF is<br />
gradually withdrawing, the security situation in Afghanistan is generally seen as<br />
deteriorating. Western security interest in adjacent Central Asia, hitherto a<br />
support area for operations in Afghanistan, will diminish. Increasing instability in<br />
Afghanistan may affect Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan,<br />
Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan). Second, the region will be left to itself and to<br />
remaining external actors – Russia, China and Afghanistan, all with limited<br />
abilities to influence security. The Central Asian states’ low capabilities and<br />
current or latent instability create an emerging security vacuum in the region.<br />
Third, the most important Afghanistan-related security challenge for Central<br />
Asia, and the world, is the drugs trade. It affects public health, spreads HIV and<br />
increases the influence of organised crime and breeds corruption at all levels.<br />
Another important challenge for the region is militant Islamism, often linked to<br />
small groups that can act as destabilisation multipliers able to exploit current<br />
tensions. Islamism is also a long-term political challenge to the region’s regimes.<br />
Fourth, today’s level of regional cooperation is not enough to handle the region’s<br />
security challenges. Capabilities and trust are missing. The outside world –<br />
international organisations such as the UN or the Organization for Security and<br />
Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), or powers such as Russia or China – will play a<br />
key role in any multilateral security cooperation.<br />
The perspectives of Afghanistan’s Central Asian northern neighbours vary.<br />
Turkmenistan, a weak state that has tried to isolate itself from Afghanistan,<br />
remains very vulnerable to influences from its south-eastern neighbour.<br />
Uzbekistan has tighter control over its border with Afghanistan than<br />
Turkmenistan, but also sees opportunities in Afghanistan. Tajikistan, the central<br />
country in the Afghanistan – Central Asia nexus, is closest to Afghanistan<br />
geographically, culturally and linguistically. For a weak vulnerable state as<br />
Tajikistan, security requires a secure Afghanistan.<br />
How can Central Asia handle the two main Afghanistan related security<br />
challenges, drugs trade and militant Islamism In addition, there are many other<br />
security challenges, such as porous borders, weak states, pervasive corruption,<br />
latent ethnic, as well as territorial and resource conflicts. The effects of the drugs<br />
trade are a problem, that is too big for Central Asia’s states to handle, both<br />
6