08.01.2015 Views

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

manner, as a great number of examples illustrate. Even the most serious<br />

violation of international law, an illegal war of aggression like the one<br />

being waged against Iraq since 2003, has become possible – without any<br />

real veto on the part of the international community! Here we have a<br />

war of aggression being waged by countries who, in the Millennium<br />

Declaration, pledged that they would do everything in their power to<br />

respect international law and human rights!<br />

The arrogant neocolonial approach of the wealthy nations, who<br />

continue to prescribe for poorer ones what they must do to overcome<br />

their poverty, will do very little to win the trust of these countries. If<br />

we, i.e. the “industrial nations”, sincerely want to resolve the problem<br />

of world poverty, we must let impoverished states speak for themselves<br />

and learn to accept and respect the autonomous decisions they make.<br />

Without this respect for the sovereign rights of these nations, poverty<br />

will never become a thing of the past.<br />

8.4 Global Compact<br />

The UN General Secretary at that time, Kofi Annan, seemed convinced<br />

about this himself when he introduced his “Global Compact”<br />

campaign, in an attempt to remind the business sector of its responsibilities.<br />

Annan envisaged the three forces in society – politics, business<br />

and the general public – working together to solve world problems.<br />

But here, too, there is a catch: the three protagonists are pursuing totally<br />

different goals. Joint stock companies are under pressure to make<br />

ever-increasing profits, while citizens are first and foremost interested<br />

in preserving the basis of their everyday existence. The kind of giveand-take<br />

situation which Kofi Annan almost certainly had in mind is<br />

impossible because the interests of those involved are diametrically opposed.<br />

Only an on-the-spot assessment of the living conditions of a local<br />

population will allow the essential needs of the people to be directly<br />

and democratically defined. These must then be defended against the<br />

onslaught of the business sector and, if need be, energetically asserted.<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!