08.01.2015 Views

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

today – that Stuttgart’s water supply had not been sold at all and that<br />

the Water Forum was simply spreading false information to incite the<br />

public.<br />

Mayor Schuster himself performed an even greater balancing act<br />

by arguing time and time again at organised events and in newspaper<br />

articles in favour of keeping the water supply in the public domain.<br />

The politician who expressed himself in the most preposterous way,<br />

in my opinion, was Rezzo Schlauch, parliamentary leader of the Green<br />

Party in the Bundestag at the time. On May 7, 2002, he wrote an<br />

email in answer to a query voicing concern about a takeover of the<br />

existing operator by large foreign companies. I quote: “First of all, I<br />

wish to protest against the blanket demonisation of ‘global companies’.<br />

This kind of generalisation is simply missing the point and does not<br />

do justice to the complexity of the issue. Secondly, I would ask you<br />

to take note of the advantages and opportunities to be gained from<br />

increased competition, even within the public service sector (falling<br />

prices, better service ...). Why should our water not be delivered by a<br />

foreign company The main thing is that reasonable quality and safety<br />

standards are set by the government. This is exactly what is happening,<br />

above all at European level. One last word on the topic of ‘German’<br />

resources: the use of this terminology is, in my opinion, indicative of<br />

an anachronistic form of nationalism, which is as backward-looking as<br />

it is dangerous. Why should it matter at all whether energy is German,<br />

French, British or Belgian In a Europe which is becoming more and<br />

more unified there should no longer be any room for such categories.”<br />

All the clichés which are usually cited in order to promote the<br />

commercialisation of public services appear in this statement: it is<br />

“nationalistic” to have our essential public services provided by<br />

municipal operating companies, which have been protected for<br />

generations by a regional monopoly, just as it is a gesture of openness<br />

and understanding in a “Europe which is becoming more and more<br />

unified” to have foreign companies running the municipal installations<br />

and utilities which provide our essential public services. This may well<br />

be true of a Europe of bureaucrats and consortiums but, with regard<br />

to Schlauch’s remarks, it remains to be seen just how the operating<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!