08.01.2015 Views

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

poses a minimum of restriction and strain” on trade and industry. In<br />

this case, too, there is almost unlimited scope for interpretation. The<br />

thought of a WTO arbitration service determining the effectiveness of<br />

measures which a nation itself considers to be necessary – dismissing<br />

in the process the political will of the population – is positively<br />

ludicrous. This prerogative is neither democratically legitimate nor can<br />

it be derived from the WTO’s doctrine, which states that free trade is<br />

indispensable if people are to live together in peace.<br />

Particularly problematic is the fact that once contractual<br />

commitments have been entered into, it is almost impossible to<br />

revoke them. Should a country nevertheless wish to free itself from the<br />

stranglehold of the GATS agreement or withdraw its consent to open<br />

up its market, then it may do so only if it allows further liberalisation<br />

in other areas. What this means in practical terms is: once a nation<br />

has opened up its electricity market, for example, and for some reason<br />

or other, now wishes to reverse the process, it is compelled to make<br />

alternative offers relating to other sectors, and all the other WTO<br />

members have to give their approval.<br />

The greatest pressure to liberalise the water market is exerted by<br />

Europe. In 1999, Sir Leon Brittain, Pascal Lamy’s predecessor as EU<br />

trade commissioner, founded the European Services Forum (ESF), an<br />

industrial lobbying group which allowed banks or European companies<br />

active in the service sector – i.e. education, water, energy, refuse<br />

disposal, transport – to participate directly in the GATS negotiations<br />

or represent their own interests there. National parliaments and civil<br />

society groups, on the other hand, were not invited. They have never<br />

had – and still do not have – access to the contents of most negotiations.<br />

This state of affairs would explain the fierce criticism directed towards<br />

the WTO by many people who believe that the organisation has<br />

already assumed the role of “world government”, responsible solely<br />

for the promotion of business interests.<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!