08.01.2015 Views

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which are demanding the return of their hereditary territorial rights.<br />

Although this privatisation model is meant to ensure that 70 per<br />

cent of company shares are owned by consumers, shares may be sold<br />

according to commercial law, just like in any other partnership. Noone<br />

can prevent private companies buying up these shares and one day<br />

gaining control of the water supply.<br />

This is a volatile situation which could lead to further conflicts.<br />

The GTZ is obviously not interested in reaching the kind of “mutual”<br />

agreement which it and other institutions call for in critical situations. In<br />

April 2000, activists from social movements and citizens’ organisations<br />

founded the National Interinstitutional Water Committee (CONIAG),<br />

with the aim of holding public meetings where controversial issues<br />

could be discussed and negotiated. The GTZ’s response was to<br />

undermine the process by trying to seize control of the organisation.<br />

When this attempt failed, it set up a parallel committee to prevent any<br />

public amendment of water regulations that might not be compatible<br />

with its own privatisation strategies.<br />

Whenever views from the civil movements’ camp diverge from its<br />

own, the GTZ’s stereotype reaction clearly demonstrates that it does not<br />

want any form of public participation or co-determination whatsoever.<br />

When, within the framework of the National Irrigation Plan, a<br />

scheduled private-enterprise irrigation foundation (FUNRIEGO),<br />

financed by government funding but with no liability towards the<br />

public, was up for consideration alongside a more popular participatory<br />

model (a National Irrigation Service), the GTZ insisted on pursuing<br />

the creation of this private foundation. The manner in which all this<br />

took place revealed the private company’s true intentions – to appoint<br />

manipulable top-ranking officials to take control of resources.<br />

In the past, the leading protagonists from the various governments<br />

responsible for speeding up privatisation policies have been backed by<br />

experts and engineers employed by the GTZ – support they still enjoy<br />

to this day.<br />

82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!