08.01.2015 Views

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

WATER ABLAZE - Patagonia Sin Represas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1996 onwards, which resulted in the sale of the municipal electricity<br />

and gas networks and over 100,000 local authority apartments to<br />

private international corporations.<br />

In 1999, via a complex holding structure, the private investors RWE<br />

(Germany) and Veolia Environnement, formerly Vivendi (France),<br />

bought a 49∙9 per-cent interest in the Berliner Wasserbetriebe (BWB),<br />

a municipal water company, for the sum of €1·67 billion. The companies<br />

were guaranteed an enormous annual rate of return laid down in<br />

secret contractual documents and backed by a brand new law governing<br />

partial privatisation.<br />

Responsible for the privatisation deal was the grand coalition,<br />

made up of CDU and SPD, under the overall control of finance<br />

senator Dr. Annette Fugmann-Heesing (SPD) and Mayor<br />

Eberhard Diepgen (CDU). The Partial Privatisation Act was drawn<br />

up by the law firm Finkelnberg & Clemm (now White & Case).<br />

This act was declared unconstitutional in part by the constitutional<br />

court in Berlin – in particular the regulation of calculated returns included<br />

in the water price. Nevertheless, these regulations were retained<br />

in the secret contracts guaranteeing RWE and Veolia annual yields for a<br />

minimum period of 30 years. The amount involved is proportionate to<br />

the average yields on ten-year federal loans over the previous 20 years,<br />

plus 2 per cent (R+2 formula) and is based on the annually-increasing<br />

operating capital required by the water utilities: in 2007, this came<br />

to around 8∙5 per cent based on €3∙6 billion. Following privatisation,<br />

employees were made redundant and maintenance services drastically<br />

reduced in order to cut costs and increase profits. In addition<br />

to these measures, an immediate price increase of 30 per cent would<br />

have been necessary to guarantee the promised annual rate of return.<br />

Because the government – for political reasons – had no wish to raise<br />

prices immediately or to such a large extent, the state of Berlin was<br />

forced to do without part of the profits it was entitled to in favour of<br />

RWE and Veolia. Meanwhile the public is footing the bill for this privatisation<br />

deal through a 28 per-cent price increase.<br />

It must also be pointed out that managerial control of the company<br />

was handed over to the investors RWE and Veolia even<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!