Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANNEX 5: GUIDING NOTE ON CIP MONITORING AND EVALUATION Approach to CIP Monitoring The Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) processes are critical in supporting the achievement of CIP expected Results. The effective implementation of M&E actions provides opportunities to: a) Engage CIP stakeholders and beneficiaries to increase ownership of results and motivation to sustain them; b) Demonstrate achievement of development results, how they benefit the targeted people; c) Support a more effective implementation of development initiatives through decision making based on data evidence; d) Highlight gaps for advocating resource mobilization. In accordance with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, the CIP Monitoring System is built on existing national M&E capacities and adopts the Results Based Management (RBM) approach. RBM can be defined as a broad management strategy aimed at achieving demonstrable development results and improved performance. RBM stands on the interconnection of the Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation processes, where M&E findings and learning are used to improve the existing plans or to guide new Planning. The implementation of the CIP Monitoring System promotes strong linkages among the CIP Planning and M&E processes, generating critical learning. In particular, CIP Programmes and investment operations are regularly assessed, discussed and reviewed based on updated information and lessons learned generated by M&E actions. This ongoing process of doing, learning and improving defines the CIP/RBM Life-Cycle shown in the model to the right 1 . CIP Monitoring and Evaluation 2 are complementary but different processes. Monitoring can be defined as the process by which CIP stakeholders (GoB, DP, CSOs, other) obtain regular feedback on the progress being made towards the achievement of the development results and targets reflected into the CIP Results Framework. Differently, CIP Evaluations are rigorous and independent assessments aimed to determine the relevance and impact of the strategies and initiatives implemented. CIP M&E actions focus on three key dimensions: i. Progress towards expected Outcomes/Impacts ii. Progress towards expected Outputs (aggregate outputs and sub-outputs) iii. CIP Investment Project Performance (financial execution) and Donor commitments in contributing to the CIP Programmes financing (Inputs). 1 CIP/RBM Life-Cycle: once the CIP expected/Impacts and outputs are identified and the implementation of investment operations starts, predefined M&E activities are conducted. Findings and learning from M&E are finally used to improve the existing CIP programmes. 2 CIP Evaluations consist in Mid Term Programme Reviews prioritized and managed by the CIP National Committee. Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 152 June 2, 2011
Additionally, the effectiveness of the coordination among the actors involved in CIP financing and implementation, which is a necessary condition for achieving CIP results as planned, represents a cross-cutting dimension to be monitored and assessed. Key questions addressed by CIP M&E are the following ones: • Are inputs being mobilized as planned • Are the CIP inputs being produced as planned • Do the delivered inputs continue to be relevant for the achievement of Programme Outputs (both aggregate and outputs and sub outputs) • Are CIP Programmes relevant for contributing to NFP goals and outcomes/impacts • What are the main challenges, risks and opportunities • Are the priority investment areas still relevant • What are the financing gaps • What decisions need to be taken for improving CIP effectiveness CIP Monitoring is conducted at the Outcome/Impact, Output and Input levels of the CIP results chain. Monitoring is a “bottom-up” exercise focused on the analysis of CIP investment projects contribution to the achievement of expected Outputs and Outcomes/Impacts, as measured through the proxy indicators provided in the CIP Results Framework. CIP monitoring starts from the input level of the results chain (CIP investment projects), as shown in the model below. CIP individual Project performance information is consolidated at CIP Programme level, according to the classification provided in the CIP “project tree 1 ”. CIP progress reporting on a yearly basis will aim at gauging progress towards Outcome/Impact, Output and Input levels. CIP Monitoring is complemented by Mid Term Programme Reviews (Evaluations) providing an independent assessment on CIP Programmes, strategies and policies. The information generated through the CIP Programme Mid Term Reviews contributes to learning and knowledge on CIP effectiveness and allows identifying the unintended results and consequences of the implemented investment initiatives. CIP M&E activities are planned and implemented through the institutional arrangements identified by the GoB. The following sections of this guiding note describe the three pillars on which the CIP Monitoring System stands, namely: 1) CIP Monitoring & Evaluation Plan 1 The CIP Project Tree matrix defines the linkages between CIP investment projects and the CIP Focus Investment Area (or Subprogramme with their respective sub-outputs) and, consequently, between projects and CIP Programmes (aggregate outputs). The aggregation of individual project performances, according to the Project Tree classification, is a proxy for assessing CIP Programme Performance. The Project Tree results from the CIP planning process and it is regularly reviewed according to the CIP monitoring cycle. Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 2 June 2011 153
Page 1 and 2:
BANGLADESH Country Investment Plan
Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 5 and 6:
MoHFW NARS NFP PoA NGOs NNS PPP REA
Page 7 and 8:
1. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTE
Page 9 and 10:
3. THE CIP IS ANCHORED IN THE EXIST
Page 11 and 12:
4. CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF CIP PREPA
Page 13 and 14:
5. THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 5.1 In
Page 15 and 16:
6. GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6.1 The CIP g
Page 17 and 18:
7. RESULTS FRAMEWORK 7.1 The Result
Page 19 and 20:
To ensure dependable sustained food
Page 21 and 22:
8. CIP PROGRAMMES This Chapter high
Page 23 and 24:
2. Improve & increase efficiency of
Page 25 and 26:
2. Improve management of fisheries
Page 27 and 28:
farmers, for value addition, produc
Page 29 and 30:
exploring public-private partnershi
Page 31 and 32:
Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 33 and 34:
No 1 Compone nt Programme Title Pro
Page 35 and 36:
• Access to and tenure of land an
Page 37 and 38:
10. COST AND FINANCING 10.1 Cost an
Page 39 and 40:
CIP Total CIP (m US$) Existing Reso
Page 41 and 42:
in 2010 in Bangladesh and the globa
Page 43 and 44:
and planned investment within the C
Page 45 and 46:
ii. Progress towards CIP Outputs. T
Page 47 and 48:
further delineate the planning and
Page 49 and 50:
ANNEX 1. UPDATING AND CONSULTATION
Page 51 and 52:
8. Technical Meetings (TM) with a l
Page 53 and 54:
Annex 1 - Appendix 1 List of key co
Page 55 and 56:
Annex 1 - Appendix 2.2 Record of Is
Page 57 and 58:
II) Food Access Officials & other s
Page 59 and 60:
group formation • Support homeste
Page 61 and 62:
III) Food utilization (Nutrition) O
Page 63 and 64:
Annex 1 - Appendix 2.5 Synthesis of
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Nutrition was a key issue that emer
Page 73 and 74:
The identified CIP Results are cohe
Page 75 and 76:
CIP COMPONENTS/ OUTCOMES/ IMPACTS N
Page 77 and 78:
1.5.3 1.5.4 % increase of artificia
Page 79 and 80:
No 1 Expected Outputs, Expected Sub
Page 81 and 82:
ANNEX 3: PROGRAMMES DESCRIPTION TAB
Page 83 and 84:
Improve extension services to propa
Page 85 and 86:
B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 87 and 88:
6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102: 6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 103 and 104: Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 105 and 106: 8 Main national implementation inst
Page 107 and 108: B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 109 and 110: 3. Direct interventions have been m
Page 111 and 112: Explanations on Table 4.1 Table 4.1
Page 113 and 114: ID 4 5 6 CIP Component Food Availab
Page 115 and 116: ID 10 11 12 CIP Component Food Util
Page 117 and 118: ID CIP Component Ongoing DPs' inves
Page 119 and 120: Table 4.4. Possible future contribu
Page 121 and 122: GOB Project Title Project Cost (lak
Page 123 and 124: GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 125 and 126: GOB Agency DLS DLS Project Title Pr
Page 127 and 128: GOB Agency BFDC Project Title Proje
Page 131 and 132: GOB Agency BBS Project Title Projec
Page 147 and 148: GOB Agency Food Directorate Food Di
Page 149 and 150: GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 151: GOB Project Title Project Cost (lak
Page 155 and 156: CIP Performance in the three key M&
Page 157 and 158: . CIP Annual Input Review (AIR): -
show all

Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?