Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS 12.1 CIP institutional arrangements aim to ensure: (i) high political engagement from government decision-makers, country partners, including the private sector, farmer organizations and CSOs, and DPs; (ii) strong coordination and monitoring of actions foreseen in the CIP in order to improve effectiveness of actions. During the CIP forum on 20 March 2011, participants re-affirmed the importance of strong coordination, as the CIP is a multi-sector tool. Existing mechanisms exist with the NFP, which should be strengthened; and (iii) efficient mobilization of resources from government, private sector, farmers and DPs, including funding, knowledge, etc. To reinforce country ownership and ensure sustainability, the proposed arrangements will use and strengthen existing country institutional and delivery systems. In this respect, CIP implementation builds strongly on the mechanisms in place for monitoring (1) the National Food Policy Plan of Action and progress toward MDG 1 and (2) the projects financed through the ADP as part of the national planning process. Institutional settings for CIP formulation 12.2 The institutional arrangements for the formulation of the updated CIP have been established in line with the decisions of the 10 th of November 2010 inter-ministerial meeting. The consequent Government directives formed two committees: the CIP National Committee, with the overall mandate to provide strategic guidance in the CIP review process (ref. MoFDM/FD/FPMU/(FSCN)-01 (66)/2008/(part -2)/184), and the CIP Technical Committee, responsible for conducting technical review, prioritization and follow up of the CIP (ref. MoFDM/FD/FPMU/(FSCN)-01(66)/2008/(part-2)/185). Both Committees are composed of representatives of relevant Government agencies, and receive technical support from the FPMU. The Technical Committee also includes non-governmental actors and DPs 1 . At CIP implementation stage, these provisions will be unified with the existing arrangements for monitoring the NPF PoA and MDGs. Towards a unified framework for coordination and monitoring NFP PoA, MDG1 and CIP 12.3 The following institutional arrangements will be used: • The Food Planning and Monitoring Committee (FPMC) is a cabinet-level committee, representing the Ministers and Secretaries of the ministries/divisions concerned with food security using FPMU as its secretariat. The FPMC is responsible for providing political guidance and orientation through the National Food Policy (NFP) and its Plan of Action. It will also ensure political coordination of the CIP at the highest level. • The National Committee (NC) is chaired by the Minister for Food and Disaster Management and is composed of the Secretaries of the various concerned divisions, Heads of Universities/Research Institutions, DPs, Private Sector and other Non-Governmental Organisations. It will be tasked with (a) enhancing coherence and alignment of current 1 Specifically, the CIP National Committee is tasked with the responsibility to: a) enhance coherence in the alignment of current and planned investment within CIP Programmes; b) identify investment priorities and gaps; c) promote an enabling environment (policies) and partnerships for the effective implementation of the CIP d) oversee the CIP implementation and monitoring processes. The Technical Committee supports the National Committee by: a) guiding the identification and prioritization of CIP related investment projects; b) providing guidance on the implementation of CIP Programmes; c) coordinating the CIP implementation and monitoring processes. Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 2 June 2011 42
and planned investment within the CIP Programmes; (b) identifying investment priorities and gaps; (c) promoting an enabling environment (policies) and partnerships for the effective implementation of the CIP; and (d) overseeing CIP implementation and monitoring processes. • The Technical Committee (TC) , responsible for conducting technical reviews, prioritization and follow up on CIP implementation, supports the National Committee. • The Food Policy Working Group (FPWG) is chaired by the Secretary of the Food Division, MoFDM, with the participation of all concerned ministries. The FPWG and its supporting four Thematic Teams (TTs) – see below – are responsible for monitoring progress towards MDG 1 and the National Food Policy Plan of Action objectives. The Government Notification of the 23 rd of December 2010 added the responsibility to Monitor CIP Outcomes/Impacts and Outputs achievement to the duties of the FPWG and TTs. The FPWG supports the NC by (a) guiding the identification and prioritization of CIP related investment projects; b) providing guidance on the implementation of CIP Programmes; and c) coordinating the CIP implementation and monitoring processes. • The Thematic Teams (TTs) play a critical role in monitoring CIP programmes and components (along the lines spelled out in the Government Notification dated 23 rd December 2010). 12.4 Role of FPMU. The FPMU provides support to the unified framework. It will act as the secretariat of the various Committees and provide technical and operational support to the FPWG and TTs. 12.5 The Local Consultative Group on Agriculture, Rural Development and Food Security (LCG ARDFS) is the venue for dialogue between GoB and its Development Partners in line with the JCS. The Ministry of Finance (ERD) , Ministry of Planning, and Line-Ministries concerned could be further involved in the meetings of the LCG ARDFS. This group contributes to improving development initiatives’ effectiveness and monitoring international aid resources and DP financed programmes. Members of the LCG ARDFS participate in the CIP Annual Review Meetings. Monitoring arrangements 12.6 At the level of CIP overall Goal, Outcomes/Impacts and Outputs (levels 1 and 2 of the CIP Results Chain), the institutional settings for CIP revision and the ones in place for monitoring the NFP PoA, MDG and CIP are integrated in a unified framework that includes: a) focal points from each relevant Government sector (incorporated in the Thematic Teams and FPWG); b) the National Committee; c) the Food Planning and Monitoring Committee. Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 2 June 2011 43
Page 1 and 2: BANGLADESH Country Investment Plan
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 5 and 6: MoHFW NARS NFP PoA NGOs NNS PPP REA
Page 7 and 8: 1. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTE
Page 9 and 10: 3. THE CIP IS ANCHORED IN THE EXIST
Page 11 and 12: 4. CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF CIP PREPA
Page 13 and 14: 5. THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 5.1 In
Page 15 and 16: 6. GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6.1 The CIP g
Page 17 and 18: 7. RESULTS FRAMEWORK 7.1 The Result
Page 19 and 20: To ensure dependable sustained food
Page 21 and 22: 8. CIP PROGRAMMES This Chapter high
Page 23 and 24: 2. Improve & increase efficiency of
Page 25 and 26: 2. Improve management of fisheries
Page 27 and 28: farmers, for value addition, produc
Page 29 and 30: exploring public-private partnershi
Page 31 and 32: Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 33 and 34: No 1 Compone nt Programme Title Pro
Page 35 and 36: • Access to and tenure of land an
Page 37 and 38: 10. COST AND FINANCING 10.1 Cost an
Page 39 and 40: CIP Total CIP (m US$) Existing Reso
Page 41: in 2010 in Bangladesh and the globa
Page 45 and 46: ii. Progress towards CIP Outputs. T
Page 47 and 48: further delineate the planning and
Page 49 and 50: ANNEX 1. UPDATING AND CONSULTATION
Page 51 and 52: 8. Technical Meetings (TM) with a l
Page 53 and 54: Annex 1 - Appendix 1 List of key co
Page 55 and 56: Annex 1 - Appendix 2.2 Record of Is
Page 57 and 58: II) Food Access Officials & other s
Page 59 and 60: group formation • Support homeste
Page 61 and 62: III) Food utilization (Nutrition) O
Page 63 and 64: Annex 1 - Appendix 2.5 Synthesis of
Page 71 and 72: Nutrition was a key issue that emer
Page 73 and 74: The identified CIP Results are cohe
Page 75 and 76: CIP COMPONENTS/ OUTCOMES/ IMPACTS N
Page 77 and 78: 1.5.3 1.5.4 % increase of artificia
Page 79 and 80: No 1 Expected Outputs, Expected Sub
Page 81 and 82: ANNEX 3: PROGRAMMES DESCRIPTION TAB
Page 83 and 84: Improve extension services to propa
Page 85 and 86: B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 87 and 88: 6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 89 and 90: B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 91 and 92: 6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 93 and 94:
6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 95 and 96:
B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 105 and 106:
8 Main national implementation inst
Page 107 and 108:
B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 109 and 110:
3. Direct interventions have been m
Page 111 and 112:
Explanations on Table 4.1 Table 4.1
Page 113 and 114:
ID 4 5 6 CIP Component Food Availab
Page 115 and 116:
ID 10 11 12 CIP Component Food Util
Page 117 and 118:
ID CIP Component Ongoing DPs' inves
Page 119 and 120:
Table 4.4. Possible future contribu
Page 121 and 122:
GOB Project Title Project Cost (lak
Page 123 and 124:
GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 125 and 126:
GOB Agency DLS DLS Project Title Pr
Page 127 and 128:
GOB Agency BFDC Project Title Proje
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
GOB Agency BBS Project Title Projec
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
GOB Agency Food Directorate Food Di
Page 149 and 150:
GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Additionally, the effectiveness of
Page 155 and 156:
CIP Performance in the three key M&
Page 157 and 158:
. CIP Annual Input Review (AIR): -
show all

Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?