Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

More documents

Recommendations

Info

points in those departments/ministries that were designated to undertake the exercise. A joint meeting with different ministries/departments was held thereafter to validate the list and to prioritize the projects in the pipeline; b. ADP: The above costing was cross-checked by a systematic screening of the ongoing projects of the relevant departments included in the ADP. c. Sixth FYP: Information was also collected for the interventions relevant to the CIP suggested by the GoB agencies for the draft Sixth Five Year Plan (July 2010 – June 2015). These were used to evaluate further needs (financing gap) so that the CIP and FYP are consistent; d. DP mobilization: a total of 24 DPs were asked to provide detailed information on their on-going and planned interventions. 13 DP’s have responded to the request. Estimates of available financing 10.6 Summary figures are shown in the table on the next page, while all the detailed calculation tables are in Annex 4. Existing financing was estimated at US$ 2.8 billion already allocated through the ADP process, including US$ 1.2 billion from Government budget resources and US$ 1.6 billion from DPs. This amount does not include contributions from DPs that are not channelled through the ADP (e.g. important US, EU, DfID and other bilaterals who channel larger percentages of their funds through NGOs). This was estimated at US$ 0.56 billion. It also does not include the interventions of multiple local NGOs involved in food security. Estimate of additional requirements and priority ranking. 10.7 The total financing gap (net of the above available funds) is estimated at US$ 5.1 billion 1 . However, while this full amount is considered essential for attaining the goals of the CIP, availability of funds might not match these requirements. This necessitated a prioritization of some projects for the CIP period during an extensive consultation process on investment priorities. Each area of intervention of the CIP was rated through participatory methods and the following rates were applied for each of the CIP sub-programmes depending on priority ranking: a. TOP: 90% of the financial requirement prioritized b. HIGH: 70% of the financial requirement prioritized c. MEDIUM: 50% of the financial requirement prioritized d. LOWER: 40% of the financial requirement prioritized 10.8 Through this process, prioritized investment was estimated at US$ 3.4 billion. Funds to be further mobilized from GoB and DPs are expected to be allocated along these priorities through the resource mobilization strategy described in the next chapter. When consulted, DPs provided information on possible future commitments that could be mobilized to finance CIP activities. This amounted to an estimated US$ 0.88 billion, as shown in Table 4.4 in Annex 4. These tentative allocations should be confirmed as direct contributions to CIP for alignment purposes. Moreover, a pool of funding is being established, comprising GOB funds and contributions from various DPs (AusAid, CIDA, DFID, EC, KfW, GTZ, JICA, SIDA, UNFPA, WB, UNAIDS, UNICEF, WHO, and USAID) for the 32 OPs of HPNSDP, expected to be approved in June 2011. So far, a total amount of around US$ 1.3 billion has been committed from DPs (of which an estimated 15% are contributions for direct interve ntions on nutrition). 1 Around US$ 321 M are about to be allocated by GOB and DPs for the implementation of direct nutrition interventions. Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 2 June 2011 38
CIP Total CIP (m US$) Existing Resources (m US$) Financing gap (m US$) ID Component Programme GOB DPs Total Total Priority A = D + E B C D E F 1 Sustainable and diversified agriculture through integrated research and extension 781.2 33.9 143.3 177.2 604.1 441.3 2 Improved water management and infrastructure for irrigation purposes 1,630.4 410.8 361.2 772.0 858.3 583.6 3 Improved quality of input and soil fertility 343.0 28.1 83.1 111.2 231.8 170.3 Food Availability 4 Fisheries and aquaculture development 392.9 19.7 17.0 36.6 356.3 211.6 5 Livestock development, with a focus on poultry and dairy production 835.1 22.1 38.0 60.1 775.1 439.7 Subtotal - Availability 3,982.7 514.5 642.5 1,157.1 2,825.6 1,846.4 6 Improved access to market, value addition in agriculture and non farm incomes 1,258.3 417.0 206.4 623.4 634.9 368.3 7 Strengthened capacities for implementation and monitoring of NFP and CIP actions 113.2 0.2 14.4 14.6 98.6 69.0 8 Enhanced public food management system 637.3 142.2 202.0 344.2 293.2 212.1 9 Institutional Development and Capacity Development for more effective safety nets 1,064.6 116.6 476.2 592.7 471.8 340.5 Subtotal - Access 3,073.4 675.9 899.0 1,574.9 1,498.5 990.0 10 Food Access Food Utilization Community based nutrition programmes and services 558.0 5.2 15.5 20.6 537.4 480.0 11 Orient food and nutrition actions through data 33.2 1.2 10.1 11.3 21.9 13.0 12 Food safety and quality improvement 186.5 1.3 7.6 8.9 177.5 90.8 Subtotal - Utilization 777.7 7.7 33.1 40.8 736.8 583.9 TOTAL 7,833.7 1,198.2 1,574.7 2,772.8 5,060.9 3,420.3 Updated Bangladesh Country Investment Plan: A Road Map Towards investing in Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition 39 June 2, 2011
Page 1 and 2: BANGLADESH Country Investment Plan
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 5 and 6: MoHFW NARS NFP PoA NGOs NNS PPP REA
Page 7 and 8: 1. NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTE
Page 9 and 10: 3. THE CIP IS ANCHORED IN THE EXIST
Page 11 and 12: 4. CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF CIP PREPA
Page 13 and 14: 5. THE CONSULTATION PROCESS 5.1 In
Page 15 and 16: 6. GUIDING PRINCIPLES 6.1 The CIP g
Page 17 and 18: 7. RESULTS FRAMEWORK 7.1 The Result
Page 19 and 20: To ensure dependable sustained food
Page 21 and 22: 8. CIP PROGRAMMES This Chapter high
Page 23 and 24: 2. Improve & increase efficiency of
Page 25 and 26: 2. Improve management of fisheries
Page 27 and 28: farmers, for value addition, produc
Page 29 and 30: exploring public-private partnershi
Page 31 and 32: Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 33 and 34: No 1 Compone nt Programme Title Pro
Page 35 and 36: • Access to and tenure of land an
Page 37: 10. COST AND FINANCING 10.1 Cost an
Page 41 and 42: in 2010 in Bangladesh and the globa
Page 43 and 44: and planned investment within the C
Page 45 and 46: ii. Progress towards CIP Outputs. T
Page 47 and 48: further delineate the planning and
Page 49 and 50: ANNEX 1. UPDATING AND CONSULTATION
Page 51 and 52: 8. Technical Meetings (TM) with a l
Page 53 and 54: Annex 1 - Appendix 1 List of key co
Page 55 and 56: Annex 1 - Appendix 2.2 Record of Is
Page 57 and 58: II) Food Access Officials & other s
Page 59 and 60: group formation • Support homeste
Page 61 and 62: III) Food utilization (Nutrition) O
Page 63 and 64: Annex 1 - Appendix 2.5 Synthesis of
Page 71 and 72: Nutrition was a key issue that emer
Page 73 and 74: The identified CIP Results are cohe
Page 75 and 76: CIP COMPONENTS/ OUTCOMES/ IMPACTS N
Page 77 and 78: 1.5.3 1.5.4 % increase of artificia
Page 79 and 80: No 1 Expected Outputs, Expected Sub
Page 81 and 82: ANNEX 3: PROGRAMMES DESCRIPTION TAB
Page 83 and 84: Improve extension services to propa
Page 85 and 86: B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 87 and 88: 6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 89 and 90:
B. Priority Interventions 6 Priorit
Page 91 and 92:
6 Priorities from Consultation Proc
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Programme 11: Orient Food and Nutri
Page 105 and 106:
8 Main national implementation inst
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
3. Direct interventions have been m
Page 111 and 112:
Explanations on Table 4.1 Table 4.1
Page 113 and 114:
ID 4 5 6 CIP Component Food Availab
Page 115 and 116:
ID 10 11 12 CIP Component Food Util
Page 117 and 118:
ID CIP Component Ongoing DPs' inves
Page 119 and 120:
Table 4.4. Possible future contribu
Page 121 and 122:
GOB Project Title Project Cost (lak
Page 123 and 124:
GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 125 and 126:
GOB Agency DLS DLS Project Title Pr
Page 127 and 128:
GOB Agency BFDC Project Title Proje
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
GOB Agency BBS Project Title Projec
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
GOB Agency Food Directorate Food Di
Page 149 and 150:
GOB Agency Project Title Project Co
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Additionally, the effectiveness of
Page 155 and 156:
CIP Performance in the three key M&
Page 157 and 158:
. CIP Annual Input Review (AIR): -
show all

Bangladesh Country Investment Plan - Feed the Future

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?