13.01.2015 Views

Silviculture and Cinegetics Review - Societatea Progresul Silvic

Silviculture and Cinegetics Review - Societatea Progresul Silvic

Silviculture and Cinegetics Review - Societatea Progresul Silvic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FORESTRY BELTS SILVICULTURE AND CINEGETICS REVIEW XVII/30/2012<br />

shelterbelts will not benefit from the forest<br />

microclimate, the component species being forced to<br />

grow in more severe aridity conditions than those<br />

normally reflected by the forest vegetation in the<br />

region (Chiriţă et al., 1977; Geambaşu <strong>and</strong> Dănescu,<br />

2004; Stănescu et al., 1997). To establish the<br />

afforestation compositions, the technical norms have<br />

been taken into consideration (***, 2000).<br />

Therefore, in case of forest shelterbelts, the species<br />

choice <strong>and</strong> their participation proportion for different<br />

types of afforestation solutions are made according to<br />

the bioclimatic framing <strong>and</strong> the corresponding soil<br />

<strong>and</strong> ecological site conditions (Antonescu et al., 1969;<br />

Coteţ, 1973; Mihăilescu, 1969; ***, 2005), taking into<br />

consideration especially the basic indigenous <strong>and</strong><br />

representative species that are part of fundamental<br />

natural forest types in these areas (pubescent oak –<br />

Quercus pubescens, greyish oak – Quercus<br />

pedunculiflora, common oak – Quercus robur,<br />

Turkish oak – Quercus cerris, Hungarian oak –<br />

Quercus frainetto), as well as other indigenous species<br />

(silver lime – Tilia tomentosa, plane maple – Acer<br />

platanoides, hedge maple – Acer campestre, manna<br />

ash – Fraxinus ornus, pear tree – Pirus pyraster,<br />

cherry plum – Prunus cerasifera, different shrubs) or<br />

even exotical (Turkestan elm – Ulmus pumila,<br />

Russian olive – Eleagnus angustifolia), well known as<br />

drought-resistant.<br />

In the Danube Plain <strong>and</strong> Dobrogea, the variation of<br />

the ecological site conditions (soil <strong>and</strong> climate) within<br />

the territory allows the identification (differentiation)<br />

of eight soil <strong>and</strong> site situations to which the following<br />

afforestation compositions correspond:<br />

In Dobrogea<br />

I. Areas with kastanozioms (kastanozems – WRB –<br />

SR, 1998) in the steppe area<br />

In order to fit into an appropriate ecological site the<br />

areas covered with kastanozioms in which will be<br />

placed forest shelterbelts the following site type is<br />

recommended: „Dobrogean plain steppe (Quercus<br />

pubescens ± Quercus pedunculiflora), low<br />

productivity, long low inclined slopes, blunt tops of<br />

the hill or flat l<strong>and</strong>s, kastanozioms, highly edaphic<br />

volumes, physiologically shallow-medium deep“.<br />

For the afore-mentioned ecological site situation the<br />

use of the following afforestation composition is<br />

recommended: 40Stp 20Ult 20Sl 20arb.<br />

II. Areas with calcaric <strong>and</strong> typical chernozems<br />

(calcaro-calcic <strong>and</strong> calcic chernozems – WRB – SR,<br />

1998) in the steppe area<br />

The steppe areas with chernozems can be framed<br />

under the following ecological site type: ”Dobrogean<br />

plain steppe (Quercus pedunculiflora, Quercus<br />

pubescens), low productivity, long low inclined<br />

slopes, blunt tops of the hill or flat l<strong>and</strong>s, calcaric <strong>and</strong><br />

typical chernozems, high edaphic volumes,<br />

physiologically medium deep”. The following<br />

afforestation composition is recommended: 20Stb<br />

20Stp 20Ult 20Sl 20arb.<br />

III. Areas with cambic chernozems (haplic<br />

chernozems – WRB – SR, 1998) in the silvosteppe<br />

area (plain) <strong>and</strong> depressions in the steppe area<br />

(saucers, very large saucers)<br />

To frame into ecological forest site the areas of steppe<br />

<strong>and</strong> silvosteppe with cambic cernozioms the following<br />

ecological site type is recommended: ”Dobrogean<br />

plain silvosteppe <strong>and</strong> depressions in the steppe<br />

(Quercus pedunculiflora - Quercus pubescens),<br />

medium to low productivity, long <strong>and</strong> slight slopes,<br />

blunt tops of the hill, flat terrains <strong>and</strong> depression<br />

zones, cambic chernozems, slightly decarbonated,<br />

highly edaphic, physiologically medium deep”. In this<br />

situation the following afforestation composition is<br />

recommended: 40Stb 20Mj(Pă) 20Sl 20arb.<br />

In the Danube Plain<br />

IV. Areas with calcaric <strong>and</strong> typical chernozems<br />

(calcaro-calcic <strong>and</strong> calcic chernozems – WRB – SR,<br />

1998) <strong>and</strong> kastanozioms (kastanozems – WRB – SR,<br />

1998) in the external silvosteppe <strong>and</strong> medium<br />

silvosteppe<br />

These areas are recommended to be framed in the<br />

following ecological forest site type: ”External <strong>and</strong><br />

medium silvosteppe, medium productivity (Quercus<br />

pedunculiflora), calcaric <strong>and</strong> typical chernozems <strong>and</strong><br />

kastanozioms on loess substatum, physiologically<br />

medium deep to shallow, highly edaphic, loamy,<br />

medium humus content, with carbonates in the first 50<br />

cm, rarely carbonatic under 50 cm (with Cca horizon<br />

under the depth of 50-70 cm)”.<br />

Recommended composition: 40Stb 20Ult 20Sl 20arb.<br />

V. Areas with cambic chernozems (haplic chernozems<br />

– WRB – SR, 1998) in the middle silvosteppe The<br />

following ecological forest site is recommended for<br />

framing this areas: ”Medium silvosteppe, mediumhigh<br />

productivity (Quercus pedunculiflora), cambic<br />

chernozems on loess substratum, physiologically very<br />

deep (rare deep), high edaphic volume, loamy -<br />

clayey-loamy to maximum clayey-loamy soils (rare<br />

entirely loamy), moderate content in humus (rare<br />

medium to weak humiferous), without carbonates in<br />

the first 70 cm”.<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!