14.01.2015 Views

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NGPP<br />

EPS/Beck assigned its PPA to NGPP in early 2003. NSP’s petition for approval of the reassignment<br />

explained that NGPP intended to abandon the Whole Tree <strong>Energy</strong> scheme and burn<br />

conventional chipped wood from tree plantations (<strong>Xcel</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>, 2003). They also planned move<br />

the facility’s location to Waseca. NGPP pursued the Waseca plan through 2003; but found that<br />

rights to land in the Waseca area cost more than anticipated, and that landowners wanted<br />

higher lease payments for tree plantations than the developers could afford. By early 2004<br />

NGPP discussing with the cities of Virginia and Hibbing the best way to transfer the PPA to them<br />

(<strong>Xcel</strong> <strong>Energy</strong>, 2004). In the ensuing months the legislature reduced the size of the mandate to<br />

110 MW while encouraging NGPP to reduce its project to 35 MW. In early 2004 the PUC put<br />

consideration of the docket on hold until negotiations to transfer ownership of the PPA to the<br />

cities of Virginia and Hibbing were completed.<br />

Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority<br />

In February of 2004 the Hibbing Public Utilities were pondering the long term future of their power<br />

generation facilities. All options were on the table, from closing them to installing natural gas<br />

combustion turbines. Among the options was a partnership with NGPP, then stymied in its<br />

biomass project in Waseca. ("<strong>Project</strong>s Wait", 2004b) By Mid-April of that year the cities of Virginia<br />

and Hibbing had agreed to enter into a joint venture to replace their aging coal boilers with<br />

wood boilers ("Public Utilities Meeting", 2004a), and by late April the cities were lobbying the<br />

state legislature to fund their project (Swanson, 2004). After exploring their options, NGP Power<br />

transferred their interest in NGPP Minnesota <strong>Biomass</strong>, LLC to the Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority.<br />

NGPP then announced it would abandon the project in Waseca and fulfill their contract by<br />

leasing and retrofitting the Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority’s coal fired boilers. The cities formed the<br />

Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority to develop the project and eventually purchased NGPP to eliminate<br />

the complications of working with a third party.<br />

The Laurentian project involved replacing coal fired boilers used by each city’s district heating<br />

system with boilers that would eventually burn “closed loop biomass” in the form of plantation<br />

grown hybrid poplars. Until the poplar plantations become available, the cities will burn logging<br />

residues and other wood wastes. They anticipate that by the end of the 20 year PPA, more than<br />

half of the plant’s fuel will have come from plantations. Besides powering each city’s district<br />

heating system, the two projects will generate a combined 35 MW of biomass boiler for <strong>Xcel</strong><br />

<strong>Energy</strong>, which finally will fulfill the 1994 Prairie Island Mandate. Since the two plants are in the<br />

cities’ business districts, the wood fuel will be received and processed in a rural wood yard<br />

between the two.<br />

The Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority’s projects came to fruition quite quickly after the second<br />

amendment to the PPA was approved in August of 2005. In October of that year a contract for<br />

the construction of the new boilers was announced ("Foster Wheeler", 2005). Construction was<br />

completed and power generation had begun at the Laurentian <strong>Energy</strong> Authority in December<br />

of 2006 (“<strong>Biomass</strong> generation”, 2006).<br />

In previous years the facility has been the recipient of funding from the federal government. The<br />

funding has included:<br />

• A grant of $250,000 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to fund the harvest of timber<br />

from 180 acres within Superior National Forest. ("Rep. Oberstar", 2005)<br />

• A grant of $1,200,000 from the U.S. Department of <strong>Energy</strong> to study potential wood<br />

resources and the effects of using “forest waste products for biomass burning projects at<br />

the Virginia and Hibbing public utilities.” ("Grant Will Help", 2006)<br />

Page 94<br />

Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies:<br />

Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!