Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Capital Cost<br />
Users must estimate the capital costs of a proposed facility. For new biomass powered plants<br />
the <strong>Energy</strong> Information Agency (EIA) estimates the costs of a new facility to be $1,809 per kW.<br />
For proposals to co-fire biomass with coal the EIA estimates that expenditures of $108 to $248 per<br />
kilowatt of biomass capacity will be necessary.<br />
Plant Capacity<br />
The optimal capacity of a proposed plant will largely depend upon the low cost biomass<br />
resources available to the plant. Building a plant that is too large for the local and regional<br />
resource base to support will likely lead to high fuel costs, and potentially an inability to supply<br />
sufficient fuel for the plant. As a general rule biomass plants are assumed to draw their fuel<br />
supplies from a fifty-mile radius. Transporting biomass fuels for more than 50 miles by road may<br />
be uneconomical. Procuring low cost fuels from greater distances may be possible if rail<br />
transport is utilized. This will largely depend on a facility’s ability to take advantage of existing rail<br />
infrastructure.<br />
Capacity Factor<br />
The capacity factor of an electric generating plant plays an important role in the plant’s<br />
economics. More reliable plants have a greater opportunity to generate revenue than less<br />
reliable plants because they operate for more hours out of the year, thus producing more<br />
electricity to sell to the utility. The capacity factor measures reliability by representing the<br />
average amount of time that the plant is expected to be operating at full capacity over the<br />
course of a year, expressed as a percentage. A plant that operated at full capacity all year<br />
would thus have a 100% capacity factor, while time spent operating at less than full capacity, or<br />
time when the plant was shut down for maintenance (scheduled or unscheduled) would reduce<br />
the capacity factor. For example, a plant that experienced 100 hours per year of maintenance<br />
or other shutdown, and operated at 80% capacity the rest of the year, would have a capacity<br />
factor of 79.1%<br />
Net Electrical Efficiency<br />
Net electrical efficiency is the ratio of electrical energy output from the plant to the energy<br />
contained in the fuel input. This measures how efficiently the plant converts the fuel energy to<br />
electricity.<br />
Non-Electrical <strong>Energy</strong> Income<br />
Capacity Payments<br />
A plant’s reliability also presents opportunities to generate revenue through the capacity<br />
payments paid by the utility. Plants that are more reliable have the potential to receive higher<br />
capacity payments for the capacity that they provide to the system.<br />
Independent power producers are paid by utilities based on the utility’s avoided energy and<br />
capacity costs. Capacity payments are based on a utility’s avoided capital costs, fixed O&M<br />
costs, and startup costs for a new capacity addition. Proposed facilities greater than 10 MW in<br />
size must negotiate the rates that they will receive from the utility.<br />
Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page A-11<br />
Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities