14.01.2015 Views

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Capital Cost<br />

Users must estimate the capital costs of a proposed facility. For new biomass powered plants<br />

the <strong>Energy</strong> Information Agency (EIA) estimates the costs of a new facility to be $1,809 per kW.<br />

For proposals to co-fire biomass with coal the EIA estimates that expenditures of $108 to $248 per<br />

kilowatt of biomass capacity will be necessary.<br />

Plant Capacity<br />

The optimal capacity of a proposed plant will largely depend upon the low cost biomass<br />

resources available to the plant. Building a plant that is too large for the local and regional<br />

resource base to support will likely lead to high fuel costs, and potentially an inability to supply<br />

sufficient fuel for the plant. As a general rule biomass plants are assumed to draw their fuel<br />

supplies from a fifty-mile radius. Transporting biomass fuels for more than 50 miles by road may<br />

be uneconomical. Procuring low cost fuels from greater distances may be possible if rail<br />

transport is utilized. This will largely depend on a facility’s ability to take advantage of existing rail<br />

infrastructure.<br />

Capacity Factor<br />

The capacity factor of an electric generating plant plays an important role in the plant’s<br />

economics. More reliable plants have a greater opportunity to generate revenue than less<br />

reliable plants because they operate for more hours out of the year, thus producing more<br />

electricity to sell to the utility. The capacity factor measures reliability by representing the<br />

average amount of time that the plant is expected to be operating at full capacity over the<br />

course of a year, expressed as a percentage. A plant that operated at full capacity all year<br />

would thus have a 100% capacity factor, while time spent operating at less than full capacity, or<br />

time when the plant was shut down for maintenance (scheduled or unscheduled) would reduce<br />

the capacity factor. For example, a plant that experienced 100 hours per year of maintenance<br />

or other shutdown, and operated at 80% capacity the rest of the year, would have a capacity<br />

factor of 79.1%<br />

Net Electrical Efficiency<br />

Net electrical efficiency is the ratio of electrical energy output from the plant to the energy<br />

contained in the fuel input. This measures how efficiently the plant converts the fuel energy to<br />

electricity.<br />

Non-Electrical <strong>Energy</strong> Income<br />

Capacity Payments<br />

A plant’s reliability also presents opportunities to generate revenue through the capacity<br />

payments paid by the utility. Plants that are more reliable have the potential to receive higher<br />

capacity payments for the capacity that they provide to the system.<br />

Independent power producers are paid by utilities based on the utility’s avoided energy and<br />

capacity costs. Capacity payments are based on a utility’s avoided capital costs, fixed O&M<br />

costs, and startup costs for a new capacity addition. Proposed facilities greater than 10 MW in<br />

size must negotiate the rates that they will receive from the utility.<br />

Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page A-11<br />

Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!