Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Technology<br />
Type<br />
Table V-1: Emission Rates (lbs/MWh) for Various <strong>Energy</strong> Technologies<br />
Natural<br />
Gas (1)<br />
Generic<br />
Natural<br />
Gas Fired<br />
Turbine<br />
Combined<br />
Cycle<br />
Plant<br />
Coal (1) Oil (1) Direct<br />
Combustion<br />
<strong>Biomass</strong> (1)<br />
Generic Generic Typical<br />
Utility Utility Stoker<br />
Boiler Boiler Grate<br />
Firing Firing Wood-Fired<br />
Bituminous Only <strong>Biomass</strong><br />
Coal Plant No. 6 Plant<br />
Fuel<br />
Gasification (2)<br />
Combined<br />
Cycle<br />
<strong>Biomass</strong><br />
Gasification<br />
Plant<br />
Landfill<br />
Gas/Biogas<br />
(3)<br />
Typical<br />
Gas<br />
Turbine (>3<br />
MW)<br />
Landfill<br />
Gas/Biogas<br />
(3)<br />
Fuel Cell<br />
(PAFC)<br />
NOX 0.06 3.1 2.5 1.5 1.08 0.44-2.2 0.003<br />
CO 0.03 0.21 0.35 3.556 0.001 0.6 0.015<br />
SO2 0.02 15 10.4 0.4 0.58 0.65 0.006<br />
PM 0.08 1.5 0.87 1.5 0.05 0.07 Negligible<br />
CO2 750 2,296 1,708 3,407 1,962 1,958-3,132 1,078<br />
(Xenergy and Energetic Management Associates, 2003)<br />
1. Massachusetts <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Working Group Technology Assessment, 2001<br />
2. Mann, M & Spath, P. “Life Cycle Assessment of a <strong>Biomass</strong> Gasification Combined-Cycle System,” December 1997.<br />
3. Arthur D. Little, Inc. “Profiles of Leading Renewable <strong>Energy</strong> Technologies for the Massachusetts Renewable <strong>Energy</strong> Trust<br />
Fund,” October 10, 1998.<br />
GASIFICATION<br />
Biological Gasification<br />
Anaerobic digestion falls within a general category called biological gasification, the process of<br />
generating biogas from decomposing organic matter. It can take place in a vessel containing<br />
oxygen, in which case it is called aerobic digestion, or in a vessel deprived of oxygen, in which<br />
case it is called anaerobic digestion.<br />
The process of anaerobic digestion is simple: a conveyor meters sludge, garbage and other<br />
wastes into the end of a long revolving sealed cylinder. The inside of the cylinder is heated to<br />
grow bacteria that decompose waste to produce methane. The cylinder slants down from the<br />
infeed end. That combines with the tumbling action to move the waste slurry slowly from the<br />
high end, where it has entered the cylinder, to the far end where the remaining waste is<br />
removed.<br />
As it usually is practiced, anaerobic digestion is an imperfect process. Most anaerobic digesters<br />
are used to dispose of waste, not produce energy. So they just flare off methane and CO2 or<br />
release them into the air (Xenergy and Energetic Management Associates, 2003). Not only does<br />
that waste energy, it also puts two of the worst greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere. Two<br />
other drawbacks of anaerobic digestion are its slow rate of decomposition and its incomplete<br />
conversion of organic waste.<br />
Nevertheless, anaerobic digesters do play a beneficial role in managing wastes. They take up<br />
little space, use little energy, and dispose of nasty waste streams, like animal manure, sewage<br />
sludge and industrial effluents, that we don’t want to see in our groundwater. Many municipal<br />
wastewater treatment plants across the U.S. use anaerobic digesters to reduce solids in sewage<br />
sludge (Dayton, 2001).<br />
Concerns about the environmental impacts of livestock wastes have rekindled interest in<br />
anaerobic digestion. Manures from dairy and swine farms make good feedstocks for anaerobic<br />
Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page 59<br />
Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities