Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(Washington State University, n.d.)<br />
Figure IV-1: Tub Grinder<br />
Log size is an important consideration in deciding which machine to use. Tub grinders can<br />
handle trees and stumps up to 14’ diameter. But even the largest chippers do not work well on<br />
trees larger than 2’ in diameter. Logs larger than that have to be split by shears into pieces with<br />
a diameter less than 2’ in order to enter a chipper. Thus tub grinders reduce large logs more<br />
cheaply than chippers because only one step with one machine is involved. But if the tub<br />
grinder can’t make wood particles small enough to meet specifications in one pass, that<br />
becomes a false economy because the wood has to run through the machine a second time,<br />
adding cost. If possible, the plant should select a machine that produces its size specification in<br />
a single pass.<br />
In Minnesota, the usual cost of grinding or chipping logs and brush to a particle size of less than<br />
2” would be $8.00 to $15.00 per ton, not including transportation and tipping fees. Adding<br />
delivery would about double the cost. To grind or shred wood to 1/4” or 1/2” would probably<br />
increase the cost by another $3 to $10 per ton. Therefore biomass facilities designed to accept<br />
larger particle sizes can buy their feedstocks cheaper.<br />
Anaerobic Digester Particle Size<br />
Particle size also affects the performance of anaerobic digesters. A size of 1.5 inch or less works<br />
best for high-solids anaerobic digesters. Besides traditional grinders and chippers, size reduction<br />
drums and thermal treatments can be used to reduce feedstock sizes. There is a trend toward<br />
doing more processing of municipal solid waste (MSW) in central facilities. Source-separated<br />
organics (SSO) programs, like one in Hutchinson, Minnesota, are appearing in many U.S.<br />
communities. Minneapolis and St. Paul are planning SSO programs.<br />
Some European and Canadian SSO plants prepare waste for anaerobic digestion by rolling it in<br />
drums 8 feet to 12 feet in diameter. Internal risers or shelves lift the waste until it tumbles down.<br />
Liquids taken from anaerobic digesters are reintroduced into the drum to inoculate the waste.<br />
The liquid combined with the tumbling produces 1.5-inch particles.<br />
Page 42<br />
Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies:<br />
Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities