Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER V : BIO-POWER CONVERSION<br />
TECHNOLOGIES<br />
Human beings have used biomass fuel since cavemen learned how to set wood on fire.<br />
<strong>Biomass</strong> eventually was supplanted with coal, gas and petroleum, which remain the<br />
predominant fuels for generating power to the present day. Until recently, advances in energy<br />
technologies meant extracting more energy from the combustion (or burning) of hydrocarbon<br />
fuels, not inventing other ways of extracting it.<br />
Most non-nuclear power plants still rely on combustion; they burn fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural<br />
gas) in boilers to turn water into steam that drives turbines connected to electrical generators.<br />
Back in the gaslight era, engineers began to develop a different way to produce energy.<br />
Instead of burning fuel in oxygen-rich boilers, carbonization or gasification heated coal to high<br />
temperatures in oxygen-lean “anaerobic” vessels. Since the vessels lacked oxygen to support<br />
combustion, the superheated coal didn’t burn. Rather it gave off a synthetic gas, called “town<br />
gas” or “coal gas,” that could be used for lighting, heating and cooking. The remaining<br />
charcoal could fuel heat-intensive industrial processes like smelting. In the 1930s and 1940s,<br />
German scientists made further innovations in order to replace petroleum supplies cut off by the<br />
war.<br />
Our discussion divides into those two main topics: combustion and gasification. Both conversion<br />
technologies are in use today. But combustion systems far outnumber gasification systems, and<br />
within combustion plants, fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, petroleum) far overshadow biomass fuels.<br />
Recently, however, the environmental consequences of burning fossil fuels have created new<br />
interest in humankind’s original fuel source, biomass.<br />
In a combustion power plant, differences in processing the two classes of fuels, fossil and<br />
biomass, appear in the front end where fuel is handled, processed and burned. Beyond the<br />
boiler, both fuels drive power generation in exactly the same way. So we focus on the<br />
distinctive characteristics of biomass fuels that affect their handling, processing, burning and<br />
waste removal in a power plant.<br />
A more recent technology than combustion, gasification, has a host of potential applications in<br />
waste reduction, biorefining, transport fuels and so on. But we are concerned here with only its<br />
application to the generation of electric power. As is the case of combustion, biomass in a<br />
gasifier usually substitutes for fossil fuel. And since gasification can produce both gaseous and<br />
liquid fuels, that means it can offer substitutes for natural gas, oil, and diesel fuel.<br />
The diagram below illustrates our selection of topics. Issues in boldface are subjects of this<br />
chapter.<br />
Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page 53<br />
Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities