14.01.2015 Views

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER V : BIO-POWER CONVERSION<br />

TECHNOLOGIES<br />

Human beings have used biomass fuel since cavemen learned how to set wood on fire.<br />

<strong>Biomass</strong> eventually was supplanted with coal, gas and petroleum, which remain the<br />

predominant fuels for generating power to the present day. Until recently, advances in energy<br />

technologies meant extracting more energy from the combustion (or burning) of hydrocarbon<br />

fuels, not inventing other ways of extracting it.<br />

Most non-nuclear power plants still rely on combustion; they burn fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural<br />

gas) in boilers to turn water into steam that drives turbines connected to electrical generators.<br />

Back in the gaslight era, engineers began to develop a different way to produce energy.<br />

Instead of burning fuel in oxygen-rich boilers, carbonization or gasification heated coal to high<br />

temperatures in oxygen-lean “anaerobic” vessels. Since the vessels lacked oxygen to support<br />

combustion, the superheated coal didn’t burn. Rather it gave off a synthetic gas, called “town<br />

gas” or “coal gas,” that could be used for lighting, heating and cooking. The remaining<br />

charcoal could fuel heat-intensive industrial processes like smelting. In the 1930s and 1940s,<br />

German scientists made further innovations in order to replace petroleum supplies cut off by the<br />

war.<br />

Our discussion divides into those two main topics: combustion and gasification. Both conversion<br />

technologies are in use today. But combustion systems far outnumber gasification systems, and<br />

within combustion plants, fossil fuels (coal, natural gas, petroleum) far overshadow biomass fuels.<br />

Recently, however, the environmental consequences of burning fossil fuels have created new<br />

interest in humankind’s original fuel source, biomass.<br />

In a combustion power plant, differences in processing the two classes of fuels, fossil and<br />

biomass, appear in the front end where fuel is handled, processed and burned. Beyond the<br />

boiler, both fuels drive power generation in exactly the same way. So we focus on the<br />

distinctive characteristics of biomass fuels that affect their handling, processing, burning and<br />

waste removal in a power plant.<br />

A more recent technology than combustion, gasification, has a host of potential applications in<br />

waste reduction, biorefining, transport fuels and so on. But we are concerned here with only its<br />

application to the generation of electric power. As is the case of combustion, biomass in a<br />

gasifier usually substitutes for fossil fuel. And since gasification can produce both gaseous and<br />

liquid fuels, that means it can offer substitutes for natural gas, oil, and diesel fuel.<br />

The diagram below illustrates our selection of topics. Issues in boldface are subjects of this<br />

chapter.<br />

Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page 53<br />

Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!