Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Dry Tons = The estimated quantity in dry tons of a given feedstock in each county.<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> Content = The BTU content of a dry pound of a given feedstock<br />
Technical <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential<br />
Since Theoretical <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential does not account for physical factors which reduce<br />
biomass harvests, like inefficient harvest technologies or the need to leave residues on the land<br />
to maintain soil fertility and prevent erosion. We estimate the technical biomass energy<br />
potential of each feedstock using the following equation.<br />
<strong>Energy</strong>Technical = Dry Tons * RP * (1- MR) * <strong>Energy</strong> ContentBTU/pound* 2000pounds/ton<br />
Where:<br />
1,000,000 BTU/MMBTU<br />
<strong>Energy</strong>Technical = The energy content in MMBTU for a given feedstock in each county that is<br />
available for use as a bio-power feedstock.<br />
Dry Tons = the estimated quantity in dry tons of a given feedstock in each county.<br />
RP = The recoverable portion, expressed as a percentage, of a given feedstock that can<br />
be technically recovered for use as a bio-power feedstock. This value also includes<br />
expected losses due to storage, transportation, etc.<br />
MR = The portion, expressed as a percentage, of a given feedstock that must remain on<br />
the land for reasons of preventing soil erosion, maintaining soil productivity etc.<br />
<strong>Energy</strong> Content = the BTU content of a dry pound of a given feedstock.<br />
The theoretical potential for wet manures of sheep and beef cattle is further reduced because<br />
they usually are not housed in an enclosure where their manure can be collected for a digester.<br />
(Fehrs, 2000).<br />
Economic <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential<br />
After we have arrived at an estimate of technical biomass energy potential, we subject<br />
feedstocks to a series of screening criteria to determine which have economic biomass energy<br />
potential for electric generation. Manures, a potentially important feedstock, call for a special<br />
analysis detailed below. Other feedstocks are screened on the bases of price compared to<br />
traditional fuels, and competition from non-energy industrial users.<br />
Manures. To begin the screening of dairy and swine manures, we find in NASS, 2006 county data<br />
that 13% of Minnesota’s cows live in 65 herds of more than 500 head, the smallest herd that can<br />
support an anaerobic digester paired with an electrical generator (DOC, 2003a). Using these<br />
values to calculate the average energy available at large dairy farms, we estimate the<br />
economic potential of dairy manure in each county using the following formula:<br />
Dairy <strong>Energy</strong>Technical= ((<strong>Energy</strong>Technical * 13%)/65) * # Farms<br />
Where:<br />
Dairy <strong>Energy</strong>Technical = The energy content, in MMBTU, of the dairy manure technically<br />
available as a bio-power feedstock in a given county.<br />
13% = The percentage of Minnesota’s dairy cows found in herds greater than 500 head.<br />
65 = The number of dairy farms in Minnesota with herds greater than 500 head.<br />
# Farms = The number of dairy farms in a given county with herds greater than 500 head.<br />
Page 32<br />
Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies:<br />
Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities