14.01.2015 Views

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Dry Tons = The estimated quantity in dry tons of a given feedstock in each county.<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Content = The BTU content of a dry pound of a given feedstock<br />

Technical <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential<br />

Since Theoretical <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential does not account for physical factors which reduce<br />

biomass harvests, like inefficient harvest technologies or the need to leave residues on the land<br />

to maintain soil fertility and prevent erosion. We estimate the technical biomass energy<br />

potential of each feedstock using the following equation.<br />

<strong>Energy</strong>Technical = Dry Tons * RP * (1- MR) * <strong>Energy</strong> ContentBTU/pound* 2000pounds/ton<br />

Where:<br />

1,000,000 BTU/MMBTU<br />

<strong>Energy</strong>Technical = The energy content in MMBTU for a given feedstock in each county that is<br />

available for use as a bio-power feedstock.<br />

Dry Tons = the estimated quantity in dry tons of a given feedstock in each county.<br />

RP = The recoverable portion, expressed as a percentage, of a given feedstock that can<br />

be technically recovered for use as a bio-power feedstock. This value also includes<br />

expected losses due to storage, transportation, etc.<br />

MR = The portion, expressed as a percentage, of a given feedstock that must remain on<br />

the land for reasons of preventing soil erosion, maintaining soil productivity etc.<br />

<strong>Energy</strong> Content = the BTU content of a dry pound of a given feedstock.<br />

The theoretical potential for wet manures of sheep and beef cattle is further reduced because<br />

they usually are not housed in an enclosure where their manure can be collected for a digester.<br />

(Fehrs, 2000).<br />

Economic <strong>Biomass</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> Potential<br />

After we have arrived at an estimate of technical biomass energy potential, we subject<br />

feedstocks to a series of screening criteria to determine which have economic biomass energy<br />

potential for electric generation. Manures, a potentially important feedstock, call for a special<br />

analysis detailed below. Other feedstocks are screened on the bases of price compared to<br />

traditional fuels, and competition from non-energy industrial users.<br />

Manures. To begin the screening of dairy and swine manures, we find in NASS, 2006 county data<br />

that 13% of Minnesota’s cows live in 65 herds of more than 500 head, the smallest herd that can<br />

support an anaerobic digester paired with an electrical generator (DOC, 2003a). Using these<br />

values to calculate the average energy available at large dairy farms, we estimate the<br />

economic potential of dairy manure in each county using the following formula:<br />

Dairy <strong>Energy</strong>Technical= ((<strong>Energy</strong>Technical * 13%)/65) * # Farms<br />

Where:<br />

Dairy <strong>Energy</strong>Technical = The energy content, in MMBTU, of the dairy manure technically<br />

available as a bio-power feedstock in a given county.<br />

13% = The percentage of Minnesota’s dairy cows found in herds greater than 500 head.<br />

65 = The number of dairy farms in Minnesota with herds greater than 500 head.<br />

# Farms = The number of dairy farms in a given county with herds greater than 500 head.<br />

Page 32<br />

Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies:<br />

Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!