14.01.2015 Views

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

Biomass Feasibility Project Final Report - Xcel Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dedicated <strong>Energy</strong> Crops<br />

Crops raised for the sole purpose of producing energy in the forms of electricity and/or heat.<br />

Over the past several decades, much research has looked into the possibility of using dedicated<br />

crops to produce energy, particularly short-rotation woody crops like hybrid poplar and willow<br />

and herbaceous crops like switchgrass, reed canary grass, and miscanthus. The research led by<br />

David Tilman at the University of Minnesota has brought attention also to the potential<br />

advantages of perennial prairie grasses.<br />

Although BioPET does not include dedicated energy crops, we include them in this written report<br />

because of their great potential. Among the benefits expected from using perennial crops for<br />

energy are high biomass accumulation and low tillage, soil erosion, and herbicide applications.<br />

Since these crops regenerate after harvest, they do not need to be reestablished for a number<br />

of years. But they are not low input crops. With the exception of diverse prairie grasses (see<br />

below), the continual harvest of biomass from perennial biomass plots requires nutrient<br />

replacement at levels similar to annual row crops (Brummer, Burras, Duffy, and Moore, 2002).<br />

Dedicated energy crops may end up costing more than agricultural or forest residues because<br />

they must cover the full costs of land and the establishment and maintenance of the stand. In<br />

contrast, residues like corn stover or logging wastes are byproducts of primary products like corn<br />

grain or roundwood that carry the costs of establishment, maintenance, land rents, and harvest.<br />

Usually, the price of residues is based only on the added costs of handling them. But, on the<br />

other hand, the cost of establishing and maintaining prairie grasses should not be high. Their<br />

economic outcomes will have to await their planting in substantial acreages.<br />

Herbaceous crops. Much of the research in herbaceous cellulosic feedstocks like switchgrass,<br />

reed canary grass, and miscanthus has focused on perennial monocultures. But it is also possible<br />

to seed switchgrass stands with legumes such as alfalfa. This offers the farmer the benefits of<br />

reduced nitrogen applications and the use the first cut from the field as forage and the second<br />

cut as fuel.<br />

Switchgrass. Switchgrass is perhaps the best studied perennial grass in the US – it has even been<br />

mentioned in a State of the Union address. A switchgrass stand successfully established in year<br />

one can be harvested in the fall of year two and for several years thereafter. Switchgrass stands<br />

are expected to last for ten years before reestablishment, but some may remain productive<br />

much longer. Yields vary widely depending on soils and rainfall. They tend to be lower in the dry<br />

high plains states than they are in the moist southeastern states. In Iowa yields range from 1 to<br />

5.25 tons per acre, with an average of roughly 2.5 tons per acre. A detailed study of switchgrass<br />

production costs in southern Iowa estimates a cost of $70/ton with a yield of 4 tons/acre<br />

(Brummer et al., 2002).<br />

Diverse prairie grasses. In recent years ecologists have found increasing evidence that<br />

ecological diversity creates greater biomass yield and stability than a monoculture does. In a<br />

recent publication, ecologists at the University of Minnesota summarized the results of a longterm<br />

study of biomass yields and carbon sequestration on plots of degraded land containing<br />

1,2,4,8 or 16 different perennial grassland species. They found that the most diverse plots<br />

produced 238% more bio-energy than monoculture prairie grasses and claimed to sequester 4.4<br />

MG h-1 year-1 in the soil and roots, compared to 0.14 MG ha-1 year-1 for monoculture crops.<br />

The researchers estimate, from these figures, that energy derived from such diverse plots will be<br />

carbon negative (ie. that the plants will store more carbon in the soil each year than the fossil<br />

Identifying Effective <strong>Biomass</strong> Strategies: Page 23<br />

Quantifying Minnesota’s Resources and Evaluating Future Opportunities

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!