Solid Radioactive Waste Strategy Report.pdf - UK EPR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV. A PAGE 218 / 257 Shielding The TN DUO design features have been chosen to comply with the following storage and transport requirements: TABLE 42: DOSE RATES FROM THE TN DUO FLASK Activity Contact (mSv/h) 2 meters (mSv/h) Storage < 0.50 (average) < 10 (maximum) < 0.1 (maximum) Transport < 2 (maximum) < 0.1 The radial shielding has the following features: · Neutron shielding is mainly provided by a layer thick resin poured outside the secondary containment barrier, between the aluminium heat exchangers; · Gamma shielding is provided by the rolled and welded steel shells of the two containment boundaries and also by the high density resin neutron shielding; · Additional neutron shielding is provided near the hollowed plates of the handling device to reduce doses to operators. The axial shielding is assured by the following features: · The neutron shielding layer is added to the primary lid to reduce dose rates to operators during handling operations; · Gamma shielding is provided by the steel material of the two lids and the flask base. Heat dissipation The TN DUO has been designed to cater for the general trends of spent fuel in Europe: higher enrichment and heat power, higher burn-up. The heat dissipation capacities of the TN DUO flask and variations will evolve accordingly with the operators’ fuel characteristics over the life of a power plant. The basket aluminium plates build heat conducting pathways to the cavity inner surface. The cavity is backfilled with helium - a gas with a high heat conduction coefficient (10 times that of nitrogen). The hottest fuel rod cladding temperature will thus be always kept below the maximum allowed temperature in transport and storage configurations. Aluminium heat exchangers are pinned on the outer surface of the secondary containment shell to conduct decay heat to the outer surface of the flask. These heat exchangers are manufactured in wave corrugated aluminium plates to ease fabrication. The outside paint coating is specified for high thermal emissivity. Handling and operations The TN DUO has been designed to offer, as much as possible, similar handling procedures and tools as the TN 24 flask family. The TN DUO handling procedures will never prove to be an issue.
EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV. A PAGE 219 / 257 The primary lid is equipped with a single orifice allowing all the operations needed after the fuel assemblies have been loaded into the flask: draining water from the cavity, venting, drying, vacuum drying and back-filling with helium. This orifice is connected to a draining tube reaching the lowest part of the cavity. The primary lid is positioned precisely to ensure the connection of the orifice tool with the draining tube. The flask primary lid has been designed with a conical form, to reduce the risk of jamming the lid in the cavity during in-pool operations. Loadings and unloadings should be performed underwater or in a dry environment hot cell. For loadings performed in a pool, a gasket will seal the gap between the primary and secondary containment barrier. Furthermore this space between these barriers will be pressurised in order to prevent water ingress into this gap. The TN DUO incorporates an innovative handling system. Trunnions are no longer located on the flask but on a handling tool serving as interface between the flask and the lifting beam. These trunnions will be fitted to hollow cavities designed on the top and bottom of the flask, for vertical or horizontal handling and tilting operations. The validity of this solution has been verified with competent experts. FIGURE 85: THE TN DUO WITH ITS INTERFACE TOOLS AND TRUNNIONS
Page 1 and 2:
A 2008-11-26 Sarah Greenwood Gary C
Page 3 and 4:
EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV.
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
10 13 16 19 22 46 49 EPR UK N° NES
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168: EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV.
Page 217: EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV.
Page 257: EPR UK N° NESH-G/2008/en/0123 REV.
show all

Solid Radioactive Waste Strategy Report.pdf - UK EPR

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?