14.11.2012 Views

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

also intentionally repeated for emphatic effect. For example, the words ta;"<br />

neva" (filavndrou" ei\nai, filotevknou") swvfrona" aJgna;" (oijkourgou;") ajgaqav",<br />

and uJpotassomevna" all give evidence <strong>of</strong> the deliberate repetition <strong>of</strong> the a"-<br />

sound. The same holds true for the ou~ -sound in filavndrou" (ei\nai),<br />

filotevknou" (swvfrona" aJgna;") oijkourgou;" ajgaqav"…. The word fivlo~<br />

appears in the two compound nouns filavndrou" and filotevknou" and<br />

emphasises endearment within the family context. The prefix fivlo~, is another<br />

instance <strong>of</strong> anaphora used earlier with reference <strong>to</strong> the elders-overseers (cf.<br />

1:8). A definite link is established between the sound behaviour <strong>of</strong> the younger<br />

women and the conduct <strong>of</strong> the elders-overseers. When these women conduct<br />

themselves in their homes in compliance <strong>to</strong> sound doctrine, their behaviour<br />

places them in company with those who teach and obey sound doctrine. No<br />

one in the audience would suggest that a wife feel any different about her<br />

husband and her children. Who would be able <strong>to</strong> discredit teaching that<br />

encourages behaviour reflecting such an elevated view <strong>of</strong> the family; that<br />

encourages its adherents <strong>to</strong> serve it; that encourages a view <strong>of</strong> the family<br />

institution that even secular society aspires after? It would be extremely<br />

difficult <strong>to</strong> resist being persuaded <strong>to</strong> adopt behaviour fitting for sound doctrine.<br />

Verse 4 introduces another angle from which Paul argues for compliance <strong>to</strong><br />

sound doctrine. He has argued on the basis <strong>of</strong> shared knowledge that the<br />

behaviour characteristic <strong>of</strong> sound doctrine is behaviour that the rest <strong>of</strong> society<br />

values. The behaviour is however, more than simple compliance <strong>to</strong> human<br />

expectations. God expects those who believe in Him <strong>to</strong> manifest this particular<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> behaviour! The i{na-clause functions <strong>to</strong> distinguish the virtue lists from<br />

any secular lists. Arguing on the basis <strong>of</strong> divine authorisation, Paul shows that<br />

God expects His followers <strong>to</strong> behave in a specific manner so that His word will<br />

not be maligned, i{na mh; oJ lovgo" <strong>to</strong>u` qeou` blasfhmh`tai. Paul’s argument is<br />

that the expected behaviour is <strong>of</strong> a transcendent quality, being behaviour that<br />

God requires. The consequence for non-compliant behaviour is also<br />

transcendent in nature, namely the maligning <strong>of</strong> the divine word. Thus, the<br />

relationship between sound doctrine and sound deeds is ultimately<br />

transcendent and presented as inseparable. Wrong behaviour will impact<br />

PDF created with pdfFac<strong>to</strong>ry Pro trial version www.pdffac<strong>to</strong>ry.com<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!