14.11.2012 Views

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

direct repetition occurs in the word didaskaliva, which here is part <strong>of</strong> a<br />

prepositional phrase, in regard <strong>to</strong> which <strong>Titus</strong> must be incorruptible (ajfqoriva).<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> three nouns, <strong>of</strong> which two are modified, is another<br />

instance <strong>of</strong> emphatic clustering. The trio comprises the nouns ajfqoriva,<br />

semnovth~ and lovgo~ uJgihv~, which are here modified by the adjective<br />

ajkatavgnws<strong>to</strong>~ (irreproachable). The minister <strong>of</strong> legitimate teaching must be<br />

unmistakably distinguishable from the illegitimate teachers. A more important<br />

implication is this: even <strong>Titus</strong> is not above sound teaching. His life must<br />

correspond <strong>to</strong> the doctrine. This is <strong>to</strong>tally in line with everything that has been<br />

taught so far in this letter.<br />

As in verse 5, where the integrity <strong>of</strong> the teaching (oJ lovgo" <strong>to</strong>u` qeou`) was tied<br />

<strong>to</strong> the conduct <strong>of</strong> submissive wives, so in the case <strong>of</strong> <strong>Titus</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

teachers are tied <strong>to</strong> the example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Titus</strong>. The second i{na-clause alludes <strong>to</strong><br />

opposition (ejx ejnantiva") who would be put <strong>to</strong> shame (ejntrevpw) and prevented<br />

from saying bad things about the legitimate teachers. Most commenta<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

understand this sentence <strong>to</strong> refer <strong>to</strong> Paul and <strong>Titus</strong> only. But it begs the<br />

question as <strong>to</strong> whether <strong>Titus</strong>, who is introduced as a “son” <strong>of</strong> the apostle,<br />

would behave in a manner that would compromise the integrity <strong>of</strong> the mission<br />

and even that <strong>of</strong> the apostle. A conclusion in the negative seems more<br />

probable, coupled with the suggestion that the pronoun hJmei`~, represents the<br />

entire Christian movement. The use <strong>of</strong> the pronoun is a <strong>rhe<strong>to</strong>rical</strong> technique <strong>to</strong><br />

facilitate identification; <strong>to</strong> engender the “us-them” sentiment. The apostle<br />

speaks as an insider. In this way, he is in effect saying that if they (the<br />

opposition) bad-mouth you, they bad-mouth me. This part <strong>of</strong> the sentence<br />

also evinces assonance <strong>of</strong> the e-sound: “… ejx ejnantiva" ejntraph`/ mhde;n e[cwn<br />

levgein peri; hJmw`n …”. This is for emphatic purposes, <strong>to</strong> highlight the serious<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> compromising conduct. Believers must conduct themselves<br />

in compliance with sound doctrine because the apostle expects this behaviour<br />

from them. This constitutes an argument based upon apos<strong>to</strong>lic authorisation.<br />

PDF created with pdfFac<strong>to</strong>ry Pro trial version www.pdffac<strong>to</strong>ry.com<br />

99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!