14.11.2012 Views

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Furthermore, through the direct repetition <strong>of</strong> the verb ajrnevomai the author<br />

creates an implicit contrast. Those instructed by grace deny th;n ajsevbeian kai;<br />

ta;" kosmika;" ejpiqumiva", whereas the false teachers are vilified as denying<br />

God (1:16). In this way, the diametrical opposition between the two groups is<br />

highlighted. The repetition serves <strong>to</strong> maintain the polarity, keeping the two<br />

groups at opposite ends and closing the door for any compromise or<br />

endorsement. The word ajsevbeia constitutes religious language. The an<strong>to</strong>nym,<br />

ajsevbeia is the opposite <strong>of</strong> eujsevbeia. Paul’s point is that sound doctrine, does<br />

not have its origin in man and encourages the denial <strong>of</strong> ajsevbeia or, positively,<br />

the manifestation <strong>of</strong> eujsevbeia in the present life. This argument links up with<br />

the salutation where faith and knowledge <strong>of</strong> “God’s elect” is said <strong>to</strong> be for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> eujsevbeia (1:1). To thus claim <strong>to</strong> know God (be instructed by God’s<br />

grace), requires a denial <strong>of</strong> everything that would contradict that claim. Thus,<br />

the two are mutually exclusive since the students <strong>of</strong> divine grace cannot<br />

manifest both ajsevbeia and eujsevbeia.<br />

Paranomasia is also evident from the two cognate words kosmikav" (12) and<br />

kosmw`sin (10). The latter verb is a positive action that slaves must perform in<br />

regard <strong>to</strong> the teaching <strong>of</strong> God and is therefore encouraged. The former relates<br />

<strong>to</strong> the world in a negative sense and must therefore be denied. The<br />

paranomasia serves <strong>to</strong> maintain the polarity between “sound” and “not sound”,<br />

which leaves the audience with a choice <strong>to</strong> make.<br />

Another key concern revolves around the difference between legitimate and<br />

illegitimate teaching. There is an almost concentric or circular progression<br />

detectable with regard <strong>to</strong> the theme <strong>of</strong> teaching. Through the use <strong>of</strong> concentric<br />

or circular progression, the dicho<strong>to</strong>my between legitimacy and illegitimacy is<br />

maintained. The progression becomes evident as different ‘categories’ <strong>of</strong><br />

legitimate teaching sources are identified. In chapter 1, it includes Paul, <strong>Titus</strong><br />

and the elders-overseers. In chapter 2, it again includes <strong>Titus</strong> and extends <strong>to</strong><br />

the ministry <strong>of</strong> older women. Finally, the readers are informed about the<br />

manifestation <strong>of</strong> divine grace that appeared and now teaches. There is a<br />

sense in which the argument has gone full circle, if we take in<strong>to</strong> consideration<br />

PDF created with pdfFac<strong>to</strong>ry Pro trial version www.pdffac<strong>to</strong>ry.com<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!