14.11.2012 Views

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

A Text centred rhetorical analysis of Paul's Letter to Titus

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Paul demonstrates that he is himself in submission <strong>to</strong> the teaching and lives<br />

as one anticipating the return <strong>of</strong> Jesus Christ.<br />

Most commenta<strong>to</strong>rs agree that this section serves <strong>to</strong> explain the preceding<br />

instructions (Demarest, 1984:320; Johnson, 1996:240; Clark, 2002:111).<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rically, however, more is involved. Paul is not only saying: “The reason I<br />

want you <strong>to</strong> do this (2-10) is because <strong>of</strong> this (11-14).” Instead, he is claiming:<br />

“The teaching that I want you <strong>to</strong> embrace and the behaviour I want you <strong>to</strong><br />

manifest are superior <strong>to</strong> what those presumptive fellows are trying <strong>to</strong> sell you.<br />

Their teaching originates from a human mind. Just look at the way they live!<br />

This doctrine is divine. If you do not accept it, you are in direct opposition <strong>to</strong><br />

God. It is a choice between teaching that is human and teaching that is<br />

divine.” It leaves the hearer-reader in the awkward position <strong>of</strong> having <strong>to</strong><br />

decide. It <strong>of</strong>fers no neutral grounds.<br />

The vocabulary selected in this section places the emphasis on the<br />

uniqueness and the distinctiveness <strong>of</strong> God’s people. There is a sense in which<br />

Paul almost indirectly uses the language <strong>to</strong> pointing <strong>to</strong> the ideal. He does not<br />

tell or specify <strong>to</strong> the Cretans that they are a special people; that they have<br />

been chosen <strong>of</strong> God. Instead, the emphasis appears <strong>to</strong> be on the notion <strong>of</strong><br />

privilege <strong>to</strong> have been chosen by God.<br />

There are in verse 14 two final instances <strong>of</strong> inclusive language. Jesus is said<br />

<strong>to</strong> have given himself “for us”, <strong>to</strong> redeem “us” (o}" e[dwken eJau<strong>to</strong>;n uJpe;r hJmw`n,<br />

i{na lutrwvshtai hJma`"). The emphasis in the final verse is on the activity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

divine. Having identified Jesus Christ as God “our Saviour”, the sentence goes<br />

on <strong>to</strong> describe what He has done: He gave himself for us, in order that He<br />

might save us. This us then become a “unique and peculiar people, zealous<br />

for good works” (2:14). The reality <strong>of</strong> the divine intervention thus constitutes<br />

the reason why Christians or Cretan believers ought <strong>to</strong> be characterised by<br />

the performance <strong>of</strong> good works compliant with sound doctrine.<br />

PDF created with pdfFac<strong>to</strong>ry Pro trial version www.pdffac<strong>to</strong>ry.com<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!