08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P O S T E R S<br />

#P213 POSTER SESSION V:<br />

CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />

An Ih-dependent Switch from Inhibition to Excitation in ET<br />

Cells by Co-release of GABA and DA from SA Cells<br />

Zuoyi Shao, Shaolin Liu, Adam C. Puche, Michael T. Shipley<br />

Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Program in<br />

Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine<br />

Baltimore, MD, USA<br />

Olfactory bulb short axon (SA) cells co-express DA and GABA<br />

and <strong>for</strong>m multiglomerular circuits spanning 10’s-100s of<br />

glomeruli. ET cells receive direct ON input and provide<br />

excitatory drive to SA, PG and mitral/tufted (MT) cells. Thus<br />

modulation of ET cells significantly impacts glomerular<br />

processing and OB output to olfactory cortex. There is evidence<br />

that ET cells receive synaptic input from the GABA-DAergic SA<br />

cells. How does co-release of DA and GABA influence ET cells?<br />

ET cells respond to stimulation of SA cell interglomerular circuit<br />

with short latency hyperpolarization followed by a strong<br />

rebound depolarization that generates a burst of action potentials.<br />

Both the initial hyperpolarization and the rebound spike burst<br />

were blocked by gabazine. Brief hyperpolarization of ET cells<br />

leads to strong rebound depolarization due to activation of a<br />

prominent Ih current. Thus, ET cell hyperpolarization mediated<br />

by SA cell GABA release might activate Ih triggering the rebound<br />

spike burst. In many CNS neurons DA enhances Ih. Indeed, bath<br />

applied DA (in the presence of fast synaptic blockers) increased Ih<br />

in ET cells. Thus co-release of DA by SA cells might strengthen<br />

the GABA-induced rebound excitation. Consistent with this<br />

hypothesis, upon SA stimulation the rebound depolarization, but<br />

not the initial hyperpolarization, was significantly attenuated by<br />

D1-like antagonists. ET cells drive PG cells, which inhibit MT<br />

cells. Thus the net result of SA cell activation may be to generate<br />

interglomerular inhibition of MT cells. Further, the present<br />

findings demonstrate a novel neural mechanism whereby synaptic<br />

inhibition is trans<strong>for</strong>med into strong excitation by target cell<br />

intrinsic properties and DA modulation. Acknowledgements:<br />

Supported by NIH NIDCD DC005676<br />

#P214 POSTER SESSION V:<br />

CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />

Olfactory-visual integration facilitates perceptual<br />

discrimination of facial expressions<br />

Emily Cahill, Lucas Novak, Wen Li<br />

University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA<br />

Multisensory integration markedly improves perception of a<br />

stimulus, especially when the sensory input is minimal (known as<br />

“the rule of inverse effectiveness”). Research has largely focused<br />

on cross-modal interactions among senses other than olfaction,<br />

implicating the thalamus as a primary neural substrate in this<br />

process. Given that olfactory input bypasses this structure en<br />

route to the primary olfactory cortex, this theory is unlikely to<br />

figure well in olfaction-related sensory merging. It thus remains to<br />

be explored how olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation interacts with other<br />

sensory stimulation. In this study, we examined the effect of odor<br />

on the discrimination of two highly similar faces using a dotprobe<br />

paradigm in combination with brain event-related<br />

potentials. On a given trial, we delivered an unpleasant or neutral<br />

odor <strong>for</strong> 2 sec, and then presented a pair of faces simultaneously<br />

in the left and right visual fields <strong>for</strong> 400ms, followed by a dot<br />

appearing at the location of either of the faces. In each pair, one<br />

face contained a neutral expression and the other face the neutral<br />

expression morphed with 12.5% of fearful expression of the same<br />

person. Despite that a two-alternative-<strong>for</strong>ced-choice task<br />

confirmed that these faces were indistinguishable, a visual ERP<br />

component, P1, appearing at 90 ms post-stimulus indicated visual<br />

discrimination of the faces in the presence of unpleasant (vs.<br />

neutral) odors, varying as a function of the level of anxiety of the<br />

subjects (P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!