Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P O S T E R S<br />
#P213 POSTER SESSION V:<br />
CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />
PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />
An Ih-dependent Switch from Inhibition to Excitation in ET<br />
Cells by Co-release of GABA and DA from SA Cells<br />
Zuoyi Shao, Shaolin Liu, Adam C. Puche, Michael T. Shipley<br />
Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Program in<br />
Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine<br />
Baltimore, MD, USA<br />
Olfactory bulb short axon (SA) cells co-express DA and GABA<br />
and <strong>for</strong>m multiglomerular circuits spanning 10’s-100s of<br />
glomeruli. ET cells receive direct ON input and provide<br />
excitatory drive to SA, PG and mitral/tufted (MT) cells. Thus<br />
modulation of ET cells significantly impacts glomerular<br />
processing and OB output to olfactory cortex. There is evidence<br />
that ET cells receive synaptic input from the GABA-DAergic SA<br />
cells. How does co-release of DA and GABA influence ET cells?<br />
ET cells respond to stimulation of SA cell interglomerular circuit<br />
with short latency hyperpolarization followed by a strong<br />
rebound depolarization that generates a burst of action potentials.<br />
Both the initial hyperpolarization and the rebound spike burst<br />
were blocked by gabazine. Brief hyperpolarization of ET cells<br />
leads to strong rebound depolarization due to activation of a<br />
prominent Ih current. Thus, ET cell hyperpolarization mediated<br />
by SA cell GABA release might activate Ih triggering the rebound<br />
spike burst. In many CNS neurons DA enhances Ih. Indeed, bath<br />
applied DA (in the presence of fast synaptic blockers) increased Ih<br />
in ET cells. Thus co-release of DA by SA cells might strengthen<br />
the GABA-induced rebound excitation. Consistent with this<br />
hypothesis, upon SA stimulation the rebound depolarization, but<br />
not the initial hyperpolarization, was significantly attenuated by<br />
D1-like antagonists. ET cells drive PG cells, which inhibit MT<br />
cells. Thus the net result of SA cell activation may be to generate<br />
interglomerular inhibition of MT cells. Further, the present<br />
findings demonstrate a novel neural mechanism whereby synaptic<br />
inhibition is trans<strong>for</strong>med into strong excitation by target cell<br />
intrinsic properties and DA modulation. Acknowledgements:<br />
Supported by NIH NIDCD DC005676<br />
#P214 POSTER SESSION V:<br />
CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />
PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />
Olfactory-visual integration facilitates perceptual<br />
discrimination of facial expressions<br />
Emily Cahill, Lucas Novak, Wen Li<br />
University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI, USA<br />
Multisensory integration markedly improves perception of a<br />
stimulus, especially when the sensory input is minimal (known as<br />
“the rule of inverse effectiveness”). Research has largely focused<br />
on cross-modal interactions among senses other than olfaction,<br />
implicating the thalamus as a primary neural substrate in this<br />
process. Given that olfactory input bypasses this structure en<br />
route to the primary olfactory cortex, this theory is unlikely to<br />
figure well in olfaction-related sensory merging. It thus remains to<br />
be explored how olfactory in<strong>for</strong>mation interacts with other<br />
sensory stimulation. In this study, we examined the effect of odor<br />
on the discrimination of two highly similar faces using a dotprobe<br />
paradigm in combination with brain event-related<br />
potentials. On a given trial, we delivered an unpleasant or neutral<br />
odor <strong>for</strong> 2 sec, and then presented a pair of faces simultaneously<br />
in the left and right visual fields <strong>for</strong> 400ms, followed by a dot<br />
appearing at the location of either of the faces. In each pair, one<br />
face contained a neutral expression and the other face the neutral<br />
expression morphed with 12.5% of fearful expression of the same<br />
person. Despite that a two-alternative-<strong>for</strong>ced-choice task<br />
confirmed that these faces were indistinguishable, a visual ERP<br />
component, P1, appearing at 90 ms post-stimulus indicated visual<br />
discrimination of the faces in the presence of unpleasant (vs.<br />
neutral) odors, varying as a function of the level of anxiety of the<br />
subjects (P