08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#P197 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSORY<br />

TRANSDUCTION AND SIGNALING<br />

Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5<br />

Knockout Mice<br />

Steven Zukerman 1 , Robert F. Margolskee 2 , Anthony Sclafani 1<br />

1<br />

Brooklyn College of CUNY Brooklyn, NY, USA, 2 Monell<br />

Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

Deletion of the genes <strong>for</strong> the sweet taste receptor subunit T1R3 or<br />

the taste signaling protein TRPM5 greatly attenuates sweetener<br />

preference in mice. However, knockout (KO) mice missing T1R3<br />

or TRPM5 develop preferences <strong>for</strong> glucose but not fructose in 24-<br />

h tests which is attributed to the post-oral rein<strong>for</strong>cing actions of<br />

glucose. The present study probed <strong>for</strong> residual glucose taste<br />

sensitivity in KO mice. Water deprived T1R3 KO, TRPM5 KO<br />

and C57BL/6 (B6) control mice displayed similar lick rates <strong>for</strong><br />

8% glucose and 8% fructose in 1-min, 2-bottle choice tests.<br />

However, when food deprived the KO mice licked very little <strong>for</strong><br />

either sugar while B6 mice continued to lick <strong>for</strong> both sugars in 1-<br />

min tests. Yet, when the test was extended to 1 h, T1R3 KO mice<br />

now displayed a significant glucose preference (66%) while the B6<br />

mice initially preferred fructose (59%). In 1-h, 1-bottle tests,<br />

T1R3 KO and B6 mice licked more <strong>for</strong> glucose than fructose and<br />

both groups preferred glucose in a subsequent 1-h, 2-bottle test.<br />

However, the glucose preference was greater in T1R3 KO than B6<br />

mice (86 vs. 67%). The TRPM5 KO mice remained indifferent<br />

and licked very little <strong>for</strong> either sugar in these 1-h tests. In 24-h<br />

tests, however, the TRPM5 KO mice licked much more <strong>for</strong><br />

glucose than fructose. The 1-h data suggest a residual glucose taste<br />

sensitivity in T1R3 KO mice which may be mediated by their<br />

intact T1R2 sweet receptor or a glucose polymer (polycose) taste<br />

receptor. TRPM5 KO mice lack this residual glucose taste but<br />

learn to prefer glucose to fructose in 24-h tests based on post-oral<br />

glucose rein<strong>for</strong>cement. Post-oral rein<strong>for</strong>cement can also explain<br />

the preference B6 mice develop <strong>for</strong> glucose over fructose.<br />

Acknowledgements: NIH grants DK031135 (AS), DC03055 and<br />

DC03155 (RFM)<br />

#P198 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSORY<br />

TRANSDUCTION AND SIGNALING<br />

Herbicides and Antilipid Drugs Block Human T1R3 Receptors<br />

Bedrich Mosinger 1 , Zaza Kokrashvili 1 , Robert F Margolskee 1 ,<br />

Emeline L Maillet 2<br />

1<br />

Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA,<br />

2<br />

Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY, USA<br />

We have found that ubiquitous phenoxy-auxin herbicides and<br />

lipid-lowering fibrate drugs are potent inhibitors of the human<br />

T1R3 receptor, but not of the rodent <strong>for</strong>m. T1R3 is expressed in<br />

taste cells, endocrine pancreas and enteroendocrine cells of the<br />

gastrointestinal tract. In the taste system it <strong>for</strong>ms distinct<br />

receptors <strong>for</strong> sweet compounds and amino-acids. In the intestine<br />

and endocrine system it is functionally engaged in the regulation<br />

of glucose metabolism and hormone release. Fibrates and<br />

phenoxy-herbicides inhibit human T1R3 with a potency<br />

comparable to that shown by fibrates acting on their known<br />

target, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha<br />

(PPARalpha). T1R3 thus may be a primary target of fibrates,<br />

underlying certain of their beneficial effects in treating<br />

hyperlipidemia and type II diabetes. Likewise, phenoxyherbicides’<br />

effects on T1R3 may underlie certain of their side<br />

effects in humans that due to the species differences in T1R3<br />

would have gone undetected in studies on rodents. This study<br />

was supported in part by NIH grants DC007984 to E.L.M.,<br />

DC008301 to R.F.M, and DC007399 and DK073248 to B.M.<br />

#P199 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSORY<br />

TRANSDUCTION AND SIGNALING<br />

Allosteric regulation of taste chemosensors: insights from<br />

molecular modeling and docking<br />

Wely B. Floriano 1,2 , Desiree Daniels 3 , Chloe Thai 3<br />

1<br />

Lakehead University and the Biorefining Research Initiative<br />

Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 2 Thunder Bay Regional Research<br />

Institute Thunder Bay, ON, Canada, 3 Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State Polytechnic<br />

University Pomona Pomona, CA, USA<br />

Modulation of GPCR activity by a ligand binding to an allosteric<br />

site, which is topographically distinct from the active site, is a<br />

well-studied mechanism in the context of pharmacologicallyrelevant<br />

GPCRs. An allosteric modulator can enhance or reduce<br />

receptor response to its endogenous agonist, without changing<br />

receptor-agonist interaction directly. In the context of taste<br />

response, allosteric regulation has tremendous potential. Natural<br />

sugars could be enhanced to provide more sweetness without the<br />

need to increase the amount of sugar. The flavor of protein-rich<br />

foods could be enhanced without the need to resort to unhealthy<br />

strategies such as increasing salt content. Here we present a<br />

molecular-level view of allosteric regulation <strong>for</strong> class C GPCR<br />

chemosensors. Comparative modeling and molecular docking<br />

were used to investigate potential regulatory sites <strong>for</strong> atomic ions,<br />

amino acids and nucleosides in these receptors. We discuss the<br />

physicochemical nature of these sites and suggest scaffolds <strong>for</strong><br />

potential modulators of human sweet and umami taste response.<br />

#P200 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSORY<br />

TRANSDUCTION AND SIGNALING<br />

Direct NMR measurement of ligand binding to the human<br />

sweet taste receptor domains<br />

Rani Parvathy 1 , Outhiriaradjou Benard 2 , Mike Goran 1 ,<br />

John L. Markley 1,3 , Marianna Max 2 , Fariba Assadi-Porter 1,3<br />

1<br />

University of Wisconsin-Madison, NMRFAM Madison, WI, USA,<br />

2<br />

Mt. Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY, USA, 3 NMR Facility<br />

at Madison Madison, WI, USA<br />

The human sweet taste receptor is a class C G-protein coupled<br />

receptor (GPCR). The receptor exists as a heterodimer and<br />

composed of two subunits, T1R2 and T1R3. Each subunit<br />

contains three subdomains: amino terminal domain (ATD),<br />

cycteine rich domain (CRD) and transmembrane domain (TMD).<br />

We have studied the binding properties of small molecule<br />

sweeteners and the sweet tasting protein, brazzein to subdomains<br />

of the sweet receptor. For this purpose we have cloned and<br />

purified different domains of the receptor protein. For the T1R2<br />

subunit, we constructed the ATD whereas <strong>for</strong> the T1R3 subunit<br />

we made three constructs, ATD+CRD, TMD and the full-length<br />

subunit. The proteins were expressed by bacterial expression and<br />

by cell-free translation systems. We used Saturation Transfer<br />

Difference (STD) NMR to monitor direct binding of a panel of<br />

small molecule sweeteners, neotame, lactisole, cyclamate,<br />

dextrose, alitame and sucralose to the receptor sub-domains.<br />

We monitored brazzein binding to the receptor extracellular<br />

domains by two-dimensional 1 H- 15 N HQSC NMR. Brazzein<br />

showed binding to both ATD-T1R2 and ATD+CDR-T1R3 while<br />

P O S T E R S<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s)<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!