08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P O S T E R S<br />

#P139 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />

PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />

DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />

Peripheral taste system morphology in taster and<br />

non-taster mice<br />

W. Wes Shelton, Akira Ito, Irina V. Nosrat, Christopher A. Nosrat<br />

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of<br />

Dentistry, and Center <strong>for</strong> Cancer Research Memphis, TN, USA<br />

In humans, taster and non-taster classification is based on an<br />

individual’s ability to detect/taste blindness to<br />

phenylthiocarbamide. It has been proposed that taste receptor<br />

density on the anterior portion of the tongue is related to<br />

supertasting in humans. Mouse strains are divided into taster and<br />

non-taster groups based on their relative preference/avoidance <strong>for</strong><br />

bitter and sweet tastants. Genetic composition in different mouse<br />

strains predicts the taster/non-taster properties in mice. However,<br />

whether or not genetic background is reflected in the morphology<br />

and number of taste buds and papillae is not clear. Due to the<br />

extensive use of transgenic mice in developmental and biological<br />

studies of the peripheral taste system, it is imperative to have<br />

better understanding of possible variations in the peripheral taste<br />

system in different background strains. The majority of the<br />

transgenic mice using homologous recombination in the past were<br />

generated using 129 mouse embryonic stem cells. To gain better<br />

understanding about the effects of background strain on<br />

morphological appearance of the peripheral taste system, we<br />

studied taste bud and papillae morphology, number and<br />

innervation in two taster strains (C57BL/J and FVB) and two<br />

non-taster strains (Balb/C and 129). 129 strain had the lowest<br />

number of fungi<strong>for</strong>m papillae and Balb/C mice had the smallest<br />

fungi<strong>for</strong>m surface area among the strains studied. Multiplying<br />

fungi<strong>for</strong>m papillae number by the papillary surface area might be<br />

used as an indicator <strong>for</strong> the size of the receptor field in different<br />

mouse strains. If so, our results indicate that non-taster strains had<br />

a smaller receptor field area than taster strains. Thus, our study<br />

shows that the taster/non-taster phenotype is reflected in the<br />

tongue surface morphology among the strains studied.<br />

Acknowledgements: R01-RDC007628 from NIH-NIDCD<br />

#P140 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />

PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />

DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />

Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM) as a method<br />

to map cell fates in adult mouse taste buds<br />

Preston D. Moore, Jarrod D. Sword, Dennis M. Defoe,<br />

Theresa A. Harrison<br />

East Tennessee State University College of Medicine Johnson City,<br />

TN, USA<br />

The differentiation pathway(s) leading from epithelial progenitor<br />

cells to mature mammalian taste cells function not only during<br />

development, but also throughout life as taste cells are<br />

continuously replaced. These pathways, however, are not yet<br />

clearly understood. In the present study, we have applied a new<br />

fate mapping technique to trace taste cell renewal at single-cell<br />

resolution in normal mouse circumvallate papillae (CV). For<br />

MADM analysis, two mouse lines with chimeric genes containing<br />

partial coding sequences <strong>for</strong> green and red fluorescent proteins<br />

(GFP, RFP) separated by a LoxP site, are interbred with Cre<br />

recombinase-expressing strains (Zong et al., 2005, Cell 121,<br />

479-80). Occasionally in these crosses, Cre-mediated<br />

interchromosomal recombination events during mitosis<br />

reconstitute functional GFP and RFP genes, with one of the<br />

proteins expressed in each daughter cell and its subsequent<br />

progeny. To date, we have examined CV taste buds in mice<br />

resulting from crosses with two Cre-expressing lines, Hprt-Cre<br />

(Cre ubiquitously expressed) and Krt14-Cre (Cre expression<br />

targeted to epithelial progenitor cells). In serial 25 mm frozen<br />

sections visualized by confocal microscopy, sparse, discrete and<br />

well-separated groups of labeled cells were evident in the CV and<br />

lingual epithelium from both lines. Within the CV, we noted<br />

groups of elongate cells within taste buds, as well as cells<br />

associated with the taste pore. In the lingual surface epithelium,<br />

stacks of ovoid cells spanning the width of the epithelium were<br />

seen. Experiments to identify cell types represented within these<br />

putative clones in the CV and to determine lineage relationships<br />

are ongoing. Acknowledgements: 1 R15 DC006888 1 R15<br />

EY017997<br />

#P141 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />

PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />

DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />

Oxytocin Receptor Is Expressed In A Subset Of Glial-like<br />

Cells In Mouse Taste Buds<br />

Isabel Perea-Martinez 1 , Michael Sinclair 2 , Gennady<br />

Dvoryanchikov 1 , Nirupa Chaudhari 1,2<br />

1<br />

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami<br />

Miller School of Medicine Miami, FL, USA, 2 Program in<br />

Neurosciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine<br />

Miami, FL, USA<br />

We have shown that OXT receptor (OXTR) is expressed in<br />

mouse taste buds. Mouse taste buds include three distinct classes<br />

of cells: Glial-like (Type I), Receptor (Type II), and Presynaptic<br />

(Type III) cells. Because these classes of cells have markedly<br />

different functions, we asked whether OXTR expression is<br />

restricted to any one of these classes. Using taste tissue from mice<br />

in which yellow fluorescent protein is knocked into the OXTR<br />

gene (OXTR-YFP mice), we immunostained <strong>for</strong> marker proteins<br />

<strong>for</strong> each cell type: Nucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase-<br />

2 (NTPDase2) <strong>for</strong> Glial-like, PLCb2 <strong>for</strong> Receptor, and<br />

ChromograninA (ChrA) or Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC)<br />

<strong>for</strong> Presynaptic cells. YFP was not co-expressed with either<br />

PLCb2, ChrA or AADC. In contrast, most YFP-expressing cells<br />

expressed NTPDase2 and showed the typical ensheathing<br />

morphology of glial-like taste cells. Single-cell RT-PCR<br />

confirmed that OXTR was expressed primarily in Type I cells.<br />

OXT peptide has been reported to affect development in bone<br />

and heart. To assess if loss of OXTR also affects the<br />

differentiation of taste buds, we examined taste buds from<br />

OXTR-YFP heterozygous and homozygous mice (the latter are<br />

OXTR knockout). We did not notice any differences in the shape,<br />

size, or number of taste cells or buds when comparing OXTR<br />

+/+, OXTR+/y and OXTRy/y siblings. Finally, to evaluate the<br />

source of OXT peptide that might influence taste buds in vivo, we<br />

per<strong>for</strong>med RT-PCR and immunofluorescence. We found no<br />

evidence of expression of OXT in taste buds, nontaste epithelium<br />

or in nerve fibers that approach or penetrate taste buds. Thus, we<br />

infer that OXT is delivered to taste buds via the circulation, and<br />

74 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> 2010 <strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!