Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P O S T E R S<br />
#P139 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />
PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />
DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />
Peripheral taste system morphology in taster and<br />
non-taster mice<br />
W. Wes Shelton, Akira Ito, Irina V. Nosrat, Christopher A. Nosrat<br />
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of<br />
Dentistry, and Center <strong>for</strong> Cancer Research Memphis, TN, USA<br />
In humans, taster and non-taster classification is based on an<br />
individual’s ability to detect/taste blindness to<br />
phenylthiocarbamide. It has been proposed that taste receptor<br />
density on the anterior portion of the tongue is related to<br />
supertasting in humans. Mouse strains are divided into taster and<br />
non-taster groups based on their relative preference/avoidance <strong>for</strong><br />
bitter and sweet tastants. Genetic composition in different mouse<br />
strains predicts the taster/non-taster properties in mice. However,<br />
whether or not genetic background is reflected in the morphology<br />
and number of taste buds and papillae is not clear. Due to the<br />
extensive use of transgenic mice in developmental and biological<br />
studies of the peripheral taste system, it is imperative to have<br />
better understanding of possible variations in the peripheral taste<br />
system in different background strains. The majority of the<br />
transgenic mice using homologous recombination in the past were<br />
generated using 129 mouse embryonic stem cells. To gain better<br />
understanding about the effects of background strain on<br />
morphological appearance of the peripheral taste system, we<br />
studied taste bud and papillae morphology, number and<br />
innervation in two taster strains (C57BL/J and FVB) and two<br />
non-taster strains (Balb/C and 129). 129 strain had the lowest<br />
number of fungi<strong>for</strong>m papillae and Balb/C mice had the smallest<br />
fungi<strong>for</strong>m surface area among the strains studied. Multiplying<br />
fungi<strong>for</strong>m papillae number by the papillary surface area might be<br />
used as an indicator <strong>for</strong> the size of the receptor field in different<br />
mouse strains. If so, our results indicate that non-taster strains had<br />
a smaller receptor field area than taster strains. Thus, our study<br />
shows that the taster/non-taster phenotype is reflected in the<br />
tongue surface morphology among the strains studied.<br />
Acknowledgements: R01-RDC007628 from NIH-NIDCD<br />
#P140 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />
PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />
DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />
Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM) as a method<br />
to map cell fates in adult mouse taste buds<br />
Preston D. Moore, Jarrod D. Sword, Dennis M. Defoe,<br />
Theresa A. Harrison<br />
East Tennessee State University College of Medicine Johnson City,<br />
TN, USA<br />
The differentiation pathway(s) leading from epithelial progenitor<br />
cells to mature mammalian taste cells function not only during<br />
development, but also throughout life as taste cells are<br />
continuously replaced. These pathways, however, are not yet<br />
clearly understood. In the present study, we have applied a new<br />
fate mapping technique to trace taste cell renewal at single-cell<br />
resolution in normal mouse circumvallate papillae (CV). For<br />
MADM analysis, two mouse lines with chimeric genes containing<br />
partial coding sequences <strong>for</strong> green and red fluorescent proteins<br />
(GFP, RFP) separated by a LoxP site, are interbred with Cre<br />
recombinase-expressing strains (Zong et al., 2005, Cell 121,<br />
479-80). Occasionally in these crosses, Cre-mediated<br />
interchromosomal recombination events during mitosis<br />
reconstitute functional GFP and RFP genes, with one of the<br />
proteins expressed in each daughter cell and its subsequent<br />
progeny. To date, we have examined CV taste buds in mice<br />
resulting from crosses with two Cre-expressing lines, Hprt-Cre<br />
(Cre ubiquitously expressed) and Krt14-Cre (Cre expression<br />
targeted to epithelial progenitor cells). In serial 25 mm frozen<br />
sections visualized by confocal microscopy, sparse, discrete and<br />
well-separated groups of labeled cells were evident in the CV and<br />
lingual epithelium from both lines. Within the CV, we noted<br />
groups of elongate cells within taste buds, as well as cells<br />
associated with the taste pore. In the lingual surface epithelium,<br />
stacks of ovoid cells spanning the width of the epithelium were<br />
seen. Experiments to identify cell types represented within these<br />
putative clones in the CV and to determine lineage relationships<br />
are ongoing. Acknowledgements: 1 R15 DC006888 1 R15<br />
EY017997<br />
#P141 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY<br />
PERCEPTION, HUMAN PSYCHOPHYSICS &<br />
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; PERIPHERAL TASTE<br />
DEVELOPMENT & SIGNALING<br />
Oxytocin Receptor Is Expressed In A Subset Of Glial-like<br />
Cells In Mouse Taste Buds<br />
Isabel Perea-Martinez 1 , Michael Sinclair 2 , Gennady<br />
Dvoryanchikov 1 , Nirupa Chaudhari 1,2<br />
1<br />
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Miami<br />
Miller School of Medicine Miami, FL, USA, 2 Program in<br />
Neurosciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine<br />
Miami, FL, USA<br />
We have shown that OXT receptor (OXTR) is expressed in<br />
mouse taste buds. Mouse taste buds include three distinct classes<br />
of cells: Glial-like (Type I), Receptor (Type II), and Presynaptic<br />
(Type III) cells. Because these classes of cells have markedly<br />
different functions, we asked whether OXTR expression is<br />
restricted to any one of these classes. Using taste tissue from mice<br />
in which yellow fluorescent protein is knocked into the OXTR<br />
gene (OXTR-YFP mice), we immunostained <strong>for</strong> marker proteins<br />
<strong>for</strong> each cell type: Nucleoside Triphosphate Diphosphohydrolase-<br />
2 (NTPDase2) <strong>for</strong> Glial-like, PLCb2 <strong>for</strong> Receptor, and<br />
ChromograninA (ChrA) or Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC)<br />
<strong>for</strong> Presynaptic cells. YFP was not co-expressed with either<br />
PLCb2, ChrA or AADC. In contrast, most YFP-expressing cells<br />
expressed NTPDase2 and showed the typical ensheathing<br />
morphology of glial-like taste cells. Single-cell RT-PCR<br />
confirmed that OXTR was expressed primarily in Type I cells.<br />
OXT peptide has been reported to affect development in bone<br />
and heart. To assess if loss of OXTR also affects the<br />
differentiation of taste buds, we examined taste buds from<br />
OXTR-YFP heterozygous and homozygous mice (the latter are<br />
OXTR knockout). We did not notice any differences in the shape,<br />
size, or number of taste cells or buds when comparing OXTR<br />
+/+, OXTR+/y and OXTRy/y siblings. Finally, to evaluate the<br />
source of OXT peptide that might influence taste buds in vivo, we<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med RT-PCR and immunofluorescence. We found no<br />
evidence of expression of OXT in taste buds, nontaste epithelium<br />
or in nerve fibers that approach or penetrate taste buds. Thus, we<br />
infer that OXT is delivered to taste buds via the circulation, and<br />
74 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> 2010 <strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s)