08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

#P241 POSTER SESSION V:<br />

CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />

Measuring referral of retronasal odors: The effect of taste<br />

Barry Green 1,2 , Karen Blacher 1 , Danielle Nachtigal 1<br />

1<br />

The John B. Pierce Laboratory New Haven , CT, USA,<br />

2<br />

Yale School of Medicine New Haven, CT, USA<br />

Referral of odors to the oral cavity is a fundamental phenomenon<br />

of flavor perception, yet the mechanism of referral remains poorly<br />

understood. A major impediment to understanding has been the<br />

absence of a method to measure referral. The aims of the present<br />

study were to use a novel psychophysical procedure to measure<br />

the perceived location of retronasal odors and to assess the role of<br />

taste stimulation in producing or augmenting referral. After<br />

sipping and spitting 5-ml aqueous solutions of citral (0.00025%)<br />

or vanillin (1.8 mM), Ss breathed normally through the nose and<br />

made natural tasting movements as they drew the perceived<br />

locations of odors on a diagram of the nasal and oral cavities using<br />

Microsoft Paint. The effect of taste was studied by comparing<br />

localization when the odorants were presented alone or with<br />

sucrose (0.56 M) or NaCl (0.32 M). With 17 Ss tested the results<br />

show that when perceived alone, vanillin and citral are localized<br />

about equally often to the nose (61% and 67% of trials) and to the<br />

oral cavity above the tongue (52% and 68% of trials), but much<br />

less frequently to the tongue itself (29% and 38% of trials). When<br />

the odorants were mixed with sucrose, the frequency of<br />

localization to the tongue more than doubled (71% and 79%),<br />

while the frequency of localization to the nose declined (46% and<br />

57%). Notably, when the odorants were mixed with NaCl,<br />

localization was unchanged from the odorants alone. Thus,<br />

referral to the mouth can occur, albeit incompletely, in the absence<br />

of a specific taste or somatosensory stimulus, but referral to the<br />

tongue depends strongly upon the presence of a congruent taste.<br />

These findings have implications <strong>for</strong> the neural mechanism of<br />

retronasal referral, particularly <strong>for</strong> how odors and tastes become<br />

co-localized on the tongue. Acknowledgements: Supported by<br />

NIH grant RO1 DC005002<br />

#P242 POSTER SESSION V:<br />

CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />

A Modest Influence of Response Bias on the Enhancement<br />

of Taste-Like Properties of Odors<br />

Sarah Nolan-Poupart 1 , Barry Green 1,2 , Maria G. Veldhuizen 1,2 ,<br />

Jessica Blanton 1 , Dana M. Small 1,2<br />

1<br />

John B. Pierce Laboratory New Haven, CT, USA,<br />

2<br />

Yale University New Haven, CT, USA<br />

Prior work has shown that odors come to be rated as smelling<br />

more like tastes with which they have been experienced. There is<br />

some question, however, regarding whether this effect can be<br />

attributed to perceptual learning vs. response bias. For example,<br />

one could observe a “halo effect” where rating one attribute (e.g.<br />

pleasantness) may influence the rating of the subsequent attribute<br />

(e.g. sweetness), or a “dumping effect” where the absence of a<br />

measure <strong>for</strong> a particular attribute results in the subject “dumping”<br />

that attribute into another response category. The current<br />

investigation aimed to determine the possible roles of these two<br />

response biases in the so-called acquisition of taste-like properties<br />

by odors. In experiment 1 we examined halo effects. 12 subjects<br />

were exposed to a target odor mixed with a sweet solution (0.3 M<br />

sucrose) and a non-target odor mixed with water. Subjects rated<br />

the odors be<strong>for</strong>e and after exposure <strong>for</strong> intensity, familiarity,<br />

sweetness and pleasantness. The order of the ratings was<br />

counterbalanced and the effect of order on the predicted increase<br />

in odor sweetness rating was examined. We found that sweetness<br />

ratings increased <strong>for</strong> the odor paired with the sweet solution but<br />

not <strong>for</strong> the odor paired with water. Sweetness enhancement was<br />

greater when order was included as a covariate. In experiment 2<br />

we are examining dumping by testing whether inclusion of a scale<br />

in which subjects can rate “other” aspects of the sensation<br />

influences the enhancement of taste-like qualities of odors by<br />

taste. Preliminary data show that enhancement occurs irrespective<br />

of whether the “other” category is available. Taken together these<br />

findings support the view that the enhancement of taste-like<br />

qualities in odors represents perceptual learning, but may also be<br />

augmented by halo effects. Acknowledgements: Firmenich<br />

#P243 POSTER SESSION V:<br />

CENTRAL OLFACTION; CHEMOSENSORY<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS & CLINICAL STUDIES<br />

Not all Formulas are Alike: Differential Growth<br />

Patterns among Infants Fed Protein Hydrolysate or Cow<br />

Milk-Based Formulas<br />

Alison K. Ventura, Laura D. Lukasewycz, Sara M. Castor,<br />

Gary K. Beauchamp, Julie A. Mennella<br />

Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USA<br />

The rate of growth during infancy is a predictor of later obesity<br />

risk. Thus, interventions aimed at preventing obesity should begin<br />

during infancy when children are fed predominantly milk-based<br />

diets. Because of the striking differences among <strong>for</strong>mulas,<br />

specifically the higher protein and amino acid content of protein<br />

hydrolyzed <strong>for</strong>mulas (PHF) compared to cow milk-based<br />

<strong>for</strong>mulas (CMF), we hypothesized that infants fed PHF would<br />

consume less <strong>for</strong>mula and show slower rates of growth across<br />

infancy. To this end, we conducted a clinical trial in which infants<br />

whose mothers had decided to <strong>for</strong>mula feed were randomized to<br />

feed either CMF (n=32) or PHF (n=24) from 0.5 to 7.5 months.<br />

Infants were weighed and measured monthly, then videotaped<br />

feeding their assigned <strong>for</strong>mula under naturalistic conditions.<br />

Multilevel linear growth models were employed to compare<br />

trajectories <strong>for</strong> anthropometry and intake. Although there were<br />

no group differences at study entry, CMF infants had significantly<br />

higher weight-<strong>for</strong>-age and weight-<strong>for</strong>-length z-scores across ages<br />

2.5- 7.5 months and significantly greater change in weight-<strong>for</strong>-age<br />

z-scores across ages 1.5-7.5 months compared to PHF infants.<br />

Infants fed CMF consumed more <strong>for</strong>mula to satiation than infants<br />

fed PHF throughout the study. That there were no differences in<br />

infant acceptance or maternal rating of infant enjoyment at any<br />

age suggests that the slower growth rate of PHF infants cannot be<br />

attributed to rejection of the flavor of PHF. In conclusion, infants<br />

fed PHF satiated faster than infants fed CMF and the ensuing<br />

decreased intakes resulted in more normative growth trajectories.<br />

Whether the enhanced satiating effect of PHF is attributable to its<br />

higher protein content, amino acid distribution, or some other<br />

metabolic effect is an important area <strong>for</strong> future<br />

research. Acknowledgements: The project described was<br />

supported by Award Number R01HD37119 from the Eunice<br />

Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human<br />

Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the<br />

authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the<br />

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and<br />

Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.<br />

P O S T E R S<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s)<br />

<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!