08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

P O S T E R S<br />

#P275 POSTER SESSION VI:<br />

PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL TASTE;<br />

PERIPHERAL OLFACTION<br />

Diminished Fat Preference in Preprodynorphin KO Mice<br />

Sharif A. Taha, Jennifer A. Heckmann, Bilal Shahid, Lara Kapp<br />

University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, UT, USA<br />

Opioid signaling plays an important role in modulating taste<br />

reward. Signaling through kappa opioid receptors (KOR)<br />

increases palatable food intake, while blockade of these receptors<br />

attenuates consumption, implicating endogenous KOR signaling<br />

in taste-guided behaviors. Competing hypotheses have proposed<br />

that opioids increase intake of preferred tastants or, instead,<br />

preferentially increase consumption of fat. Presently the role of<br />

endogenous KOR ligands in taste-guided behaviors is poorly<br />

understood. To understand the contribution of dynorphin<br />

(the primary endogenous KOR ligand) signaling to taste<br />

processing, we have systematically investigated tastant intake in<br />

preprodynorphin KO and WT mice during 48 hour two bottle<br />

choice experiments using sweet (saccharin, 0.1 – 100 mM; and<br />

sucrose, 0.01-1 M), and fatty tastants (olestra, 0.16-10%; and<br />

intralipid, 0.03-10%). To elucidate the contribution of<br />

dynorphinergic signaling to fat preference, we per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

additional two bottle choice experiments in which sweet and fatty<br />

taste options were presented simultaneously (sucrose [3-300 mM]<br />

vs. intralipid [0.4, 0.8%] and saccharin [0.1-3 mM] vs. olestra [2.5,<br />

5%]). Intake of fatty tastants was significantly lower <strong>for</strong> KO mice<br />

relative to WT mice <strong>for</strong> both caloric (intralipid; main effect of<br />

genotype, p=0.01) and non-caloric lipids (olestra; main effect of<br />

genotype, p=0.04). In contrast, KO mice did not differ from WT<br />

mice in overall levels of sweet tastant consumption (all p>0.05).<br />

When fat vs. sweet preferences were tested directly, preference in<br />

KOs <strong>for</strong> non-caloric tastants was significantly shifted toward<br />

sweet and away from fat tastants (main effect of genotype <strong>for</strong><br />

preference, p=0.001, and olestra intake, p≤0.01). When tested with<br />

caloric tastants, KO mice consumed significantly less lipid than<br />

WT mice (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!