Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P O S T E R S<br />
#P275 POSTER SESSION VI:<br />
PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL TASTE;<br />
PERIPHERAL OLFACTION<br />
Diminished Fat Preference in Preprodynorphin KO Mice<br />
Sharif A. Taha, Jennifer A. Heckmann, Bilal Shahid, Lara Kapp<br />
University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City, UT, USA<br />
Opioid signaling plays an important role in modulating taste<br />
reward. Signaling through kappa opioid receptors (KOR)<br />
increases palatable food intake, while blockade of these receptors<br />
attenuates consumption, implicating endogenous KOR signaling<br />
in taste-guided behaviors. Competing hypotheses have proposed<br />
that opioids increase intake of preferred tastants or, instead,<br />
preferentially increase consumption of fat. Presently the role of<br />
endogenous KOR ligands in taste-guided behaviors is poorly<br />
understood. To understand the contribution of dynorphin<br />
(the primary endogenous KOR ligand) signaling to taste<br />
processing, we have systematically investigated tastant intake in<br />
preprodynorphin KO and WT mice during 48 hour two bottle<br />
choice experiments using sweet (saccharin, 0.1 – 100 mM; and<br />
sucrose, 0.01-1 M), and fatty tastants (olestra, 0.16-10%; and<br />
intralipid, 0.03-10%). To elucidate the contribution of<br />
dynorphinergic signaling to fat preference, we per<strong>for</strong>med<br />
additional two bottle choice experiments in which sweet and fatty<br />
taste options were presented simultaneously (sucrose [3-300 mM]<br />
vs. intralipid [0.4, 0.8%] and saccharin [0.1-3 mM] vs. olestra [2.5,<br />
5%]). Intake of fatty tastants was significantly lower <strong>for</strong> KO mice<br />
relative to WT mice <strong>for</strong> both caloric (intralipid; main effect of<br />
genotype, p=0.01) and non-caloric lipids (olestra; main effect of<br />
genotype, p=0.04). In contrast, KO mice did not differ from WT<br />
mice in overall levels of sweet tastant consumption (all p>0.05).<br />
When fat vs. sweet preferences were tested directly, preference in<br />
KOs <strong>for</strong> non-caloric tastants was significantly shifted toward<br />
sweet and away from fat tastants (main effect of genotype <strong>for</strong><br />
preference, p=0.001, and olestra intake, p≤0.01). When tested with<br />
caloric tastants, KO mice consumed significantly less lipid than<br />
WT mice (p