P O S T E R S connexin proteins. The OB also exhibits circadian rhythms of both electrical activity and odor sensitivity, but the cellular mechanisms underlying these rhythms are unknown. Many circadian rhythms are under the influence of the daily rhythm of melatonin released by the pineal gland. Recent data suggest that melatonin regulates the expression of connexin 43 in myometrial cells and this contributes to synchronous rhythmic contractions of the uterus during childbirth. Collectively, these data led to the hypothesis that melatonin may contribute to the circadian activity of the OB by regulating gap junction expression and enhancing synchronous activity. To test this hypothesis, neonatal OB cells, grown in primary culture, were treated with 3 nM melatonin and connexin expression was examined by immunofluorescence. Connexin 43, in control tissue, was expressed primarily at the borders of contact between astrocytes. In contrast, melatonintreated astrocytes displayed increased connexin 43 expression, which included a diffuse cellular expression pattern in addition to expression at cell-to-cell borders. These results suggest that melatonin may contribute to the circadian activity of the OB by enhancing electrical coupling via increased gap junction expression. Molecular analyses of these effects, and the effects of melatonin on connexins 36 and 45, are also being examined. Acknowledgements: Supported in part by the FSU Department of Biological Science and Program in Neuroscience #P40 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGING & PSYCHOPHYSICS; CENTRAL TASTE; MULTIPLE MODALITIES; CENTRAL & PERIPHERAL OLFACTION Odors eliciting Fear: a Conditioning Approach to Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Patricia Bulsing 1 , Arne Leer 2 , Monique A Smeets 2 , Marcel van den Hout 2 1 Unilever Vlaardingen, Netherlands, 2 Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands Individuals with Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance (IEI) seem to fear odorous chemicals. To determine whether IEI can be conceived of as an “odor phobia”, we tested whether odors can elicit stress responses (1); and whether odors, after association with fear compared to be<strong>for</strong>e, are evaluated as less pleasant (2) and avoided more (3). Method: Using differential classical conditioning paradigm, an odor (either rotten egg as CS+ [CS: Conditioned Stimulus] and peach as CS-, or vice versa), were conditioned to an electrical shock as Unconditioned Stimulus (US). The acquisition phase consisted of 6 presentations of the CS+ followed by electrical shock and 6 presentations of the CSalone. The extinction phase consisted of 6 CS+ and 6 CS- trials, with no US. Stress response was assessed via Skin Conductance Response (SCR); pleasantness via rating scales; avoidance via sniffing. Results: SCR increased significantly to both odors, but stress to rotten egg did not extinguish (1); a significant (p =.03) change in pleasantness during acquisition was encountered, with the CS+ being liked less after conditioning (2); sniffing volume associated with the CS+ decreased immediately after the first trial(s), but reduction in volume was not significant over 6 trials (3). Discussion: The finding that odors can be conditioned to stress responses, leading to reduced liking <strong>for</strong> these odors, support a fear conditioning conception of IEI. However, the absence of extinction and avoidance of the CS+ are problematic in the light of the theory and additional research is needed, especially since extinction would be the treatment of choice in view of the theory. Acknowledgements: NWO Vidi 452-03-334 #P41 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGING & PSYCHOPHYSICS; CENTRAL TASTE; MULTIPLE MODALITIES; CENTRAL & PERIPHERAL OLFACTION Species specific regulation of the olfactory bulb dopaminergic phenotype Kasturi Banerjee 1 , Shivraj Bhosle 1 , Harriet Baker 1,2 , John W. Cave 1,2 1 Burke Medical Research Institute White Plains, NY, USA, 2 Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY, USA Our previous studies indicated that the transcription factor ER81 regulates tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression in the mouse olfactory bulb (OB) by directly binding to the TH proximal promoter. A recent study suggested ER81 also regulates expression of other genes necessary <strong>for</strong> the dopaminergic phenotype by a molecular mechanism similar to TH, and this ER81-dependent differentiation of the dopaminergic neuronal phenotype is conserved from nematodes to mammals. However, a phylogenetic analysis of genomic DNA sequences corresponding to promoter regions <strong>for</strong> several dopaminergic genes in mammals revealed that the reported binding sites that mediate ER81 regulation of the dopaminergic phenotype are not conserved. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments with mouse OB tissue suggested that ER81 binds to several proximal promoter regions of many dopaminergic genes, but ChIP experiments with OB tissue from dog indicate that orthologous regions of these genes are not bound by ER81. Focusing on the expression of TH, which is the rate-limiting enzyme in dopamine biosynthesis, electromobility gel shift assays showed that recombinantly expressed ER81 can bind the TH promoter from rodents, but not humans. Transcription assays comparing human and rat TH promoters in a cultured murine OB cell line also suggested that there is species-specific regulation of TH. Together, our findings suggest that there are species-specific molecular mechanisms that regulate differentiation of OB dopaminergic phenotype. However, these findings do not exclude the possibility that there is also a conserved molecular differentiation pathway that functions in combination with the species-specific mechanisms. Acknowledgements: NIH DC008955 #P42 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGING & PSYCHOPHYSICS; CENTRAL TASTE; MULTIPLE MODALITIES; CENTRAL & PERIPHERAL OLFACTION The olfactory capabilities of mice with long-term unilateral naris occlusion (UNO) and contralateral bulbectomy (bulb-x) Cathy J Angely, David M Coppola Department of Biology, Randolph Macon College Ashland, VA, USA UNO has been the most common method of effecting stimulus deprivation in studies of olfactory plasticity. However, despite the large corpus on the effects of this manipulation dating back to the 19th century, little is known about its behavioral sequela. Here we report the results of classical olfactory habituation and discrimination studies on adult mice that had undergone unilateral bulb-x and contralateral naris occlusion perinatally. The olfactory per<strong>for</strong>mance of UNO mice was compared to matched controls that had unilateral bulb-x but intact nares. Both experiments employed a masking protocol in which after successful dishabituation or discrimination to pure odors (0.1% isoamyl 40 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> 2010 <strong>Abstracts</strong> are printed as submitted by the author(s)
acetate or ethyl butyrate v/v in mineral oil), mice were challenged with test odors that were increasingly masked by dilution with the habituation odor. In the habituation experiment, UNOs (n = 9) and controls (n = 9) dishabituated to a 10% solution of test odor mixed with habituation odor however both groups generalized to a 2% mixture. However, UNO results <strong>for</strong> the 2% mixture approached significance (p
- Page 1: AChemS Association for Chemorecepti
- Page 5 and 6: AChemS Association for Chemorecepti
- Page 7 and 8: We are pleased to announce that sev
- Page 9 and 10: #1 GIVAUDAN LECTURE Normal and Canc
- Page 11 and 12: and against delta ENaC is being pur
- Page 13 and 14: #13 SYMPOSIUM - GENETICS OF HUMAN O
- Page 15 and 16: #19 SYMPOSIUM - CILIA, SENSORY DYSF
- Page 17 and 18: #26 PLATFORM PRESENTATIONS - POLAK
- Page 19 and 20: esponse selectivity for both OSNs a
- Page 21 and 22: elicit glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP
- Page 23 and 24: contrast, changing the concentratio
- Page 25 and 26: of OBPs, we have systematically sup
- Page 27 and 28: whereas mouse and joystick reaction
- Page 29 and 30: POSTER PRESENTATIONS #P1 POSTER SES
- Page 31 and 32: PROP strips and PROP solutions. PAV
- Page 33 and 34: #P11 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGIN
- Page 35 and 36: #P17 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGIN
- Page 37 and 38: TGI. The present study investigated
- Page 39 and 40: delivered in the scanner intra-oral
- Page 41: a universal odor descriptor map. Ho
- Page 45 and 46: #P48 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGIN
- Page 47 and 48: #P54 POSTER SESSION II: OLFACTORY P
- Page 49 and 50: #P60 POSTER SESSION II: OLFACTORY P
- Page 51 and 52: #P66 POSTER SESSION II: OLFACTORY P
- Page 53 and 54: hours later, the levels of prolifer
- Page 55 and 56: extrusion from OSNs. We are charact
- Page 57 and 58: anchor of ‘strongest sensation of
- Page 59 and 60: cells within gustatory papillae, we
- Page 61 and 62: excite menthol- and/or CA-sensitive
- Page 63 and 64: gene, HMBS was used. All primers we
- Page 65 and 66: oom, without time keeping devices,
- Page 67 and 68: #P113 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY
- Page 69 and 70: #P119 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY
- Page 71 and 72: #P125 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY
- Page 73 and 74: decreasing of endogenous volatiles
- Page 75 and 76: #P136 POSTER SESSION III: OLFACTORY
- Page 77 and 78: may serve to integrate central and
- Page 79 and 80: esponse magnitudes. Inhibitions rea
- Page 81 and 82: the second a non-specific cation ch
- Page 83 and 84: saline. Some of the labeled ORNs sh
- Page 85 and 86: #P166 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSO
- Page 87 and 88: pregnancy block. In order to unders
- Page 89 and 90: of GSP neurons and 97% of PA neuron
- Page 91 and 92: concentrations than flies raised on
- Page 93 and 94:
#P191 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSO
- Page 95 and 96:
#P197 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSO
- Page 97 and 98:
#P204 POSTER SESSION IV: CHEMOSENSO
- Page 99 and 100:
#P210 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 101 and 102:
#P216 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 103 and 104:
#P222 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 105 and 106:
#P228 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 107 and 108:
#P235 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 109 and 110:
#P241 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 111 and 112:
#P247 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 113 and 114:
#P253 POSTER SESSION V: CENTRAL OLF
- Page 115 and 116:
familiarity and cultural difference
- Page 117 and 118:
#P265 is found on page 128. #P266 P
- Page 119 and 120:
perception of purine 5’-ribonucle
- Page 121 and 122:
#P278 POSTER SESSION VI: PERIPHERAL
- Page 123 and 124:
(CT), the greater superficial petro
- Page 125 and 126:
were significantly different from o
- Page 127 and 128:
MSG on NaCl is evidently highlighte
- Page 129 and 130:
consisting of motors and IFT comple
- Page 131 and 132:
wing. Philip Callahan exposed insec
- Page 133 and 134:
seem to indicate that total nasal v
- Page 135 and 136:
possibly suggesting non-apoptotic m
- Page 137 and 138:
#P325 POSTER SESSION VII: OLFACTORY
- Page 139 and 140:
of 7/10, and causing eyes to water
- Page 141 and 142:
showed that N1/P2 latencies were lo
- Page 143 and 144:
differentiated patients with AD (M=
- Page 145 and 146:
pleasantness 3)of mixtures (A,B), A
- Page 147 and 148:
#P356 POSTER SESSION VII: OLFACTORY
- Page 149 and 150:
#P362 POSTER SESSION VII: OLFACTORY
- Page 151 and 152:
Index Aarts, H - P328 Abe, K - P88,
- Page 153 and 154:
Haase, L - P3, P4, P29, P355 Haddad
- Page 155 and 156:
Murata, Y - P272 Murphy, C - P3, P4
- Page 157 and 158:
Veldhuizen, M - P7, P24, P25, P242,
- Page 159 and 160:
Registration 7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:
- Page 161 and 162:
See you next year! AChemS 33rd Annu