08.06.2015 Views

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

Abstracts - Association for Chemoreception Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

a universal odor descriptor map. However, this issue has long<br />

been elusive due to the high dimensionality of olfactory<br />

perception space. A recent work (Zarzo & Stanton 2009, Atten<br />

Percept Psychophys 71, 225-247) reports the multivariate<br />

statistical analysis of a numeric odor profile database containing<br />

309 compounds. The loading plot corresponding to the first and<br />

second principal components was strikingly similar to the odor<br />

effects diagram proposed by P. Jellinek in the 1950s as well as to<br />

Edwards’ Fragrance Wheel, which classifies 6500 commercial<br />

perfumes into 14 categories. A similar odor map was also obtained<br />

from the analysis of a second database, which contains the<br />

semantic description of 119 perfume materials. The dominant<br />

dimension discriminates fresh vs. warm scents, which might be<br />

reminiscent of low versus high temperature. I speculate that this<br />

dimension might discriminate odors typical from winter vs.<br />

summer. Consistent with this hypothesis, the second dimension<br />

basically discriminates floral vs. non-floral scents. The <strong>for</strong>mer are<br />

associated with spring, and odors most dissimilar to floral are<br />

typical from autumn. Thus, the resulting map of scents might<br />

reflect the role of olfaction in chronobiological annual rhythms.<br />

In conclusion, the findings suggest that there is certain ‘universal’<br />

perceptual space of fragrances, and provide clues <strong>for</strong> better<br />

understanding the psychological aspects involved in the<br />

perception of fragrances which is of relevant industrial interest.<br />

Acknowledgements: Supported in part by a Fulbright grant<br />

sponsored by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science.<br />

#P37 POSTER SESSION I: TASTE IMAGING &<br />

PSYCHOPHYSICS; CENTRAL TASTE;<br />

MULTIPLE MODALITIES; CENTRAL &<br />

PERIPHERAL OLFACTION<br />

Androstenone Suppresses Testosterone Response to<br />

Sex Female Pheromones in Mice<br />

Vera V. Voznessenskaya, Maria A. Klyuchnikova<br />

A.N.Severtzov Institute of Ecology & Evolution RAS Moscow,<br />

Russia<br />

In mice reproductive and aggressive behavior is guided by odors<br />

and investigatory behavior provides the behavioral mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />

evaluating sex, physiological status and social rank of another<br />

individual. Failure to detect certain biological odors may seriously<br />

disrupt behavioral reactions. We studied the role of androstenone<br />

(AND) in regulation social behavior in mice contrasting in<br />

sensitivity to AND and level of intermale aggression.<br />

CBA/J(CBA) mice are more than 2000-fold sensitive to AND<br />

than NZB/B1NJ(NZB) mice. NZB mice showed abnormal level<br />

of intermale aggression. Atypical <strong>for</strong> mice in general, NZB males<br />

often attacked females. This may imply that chemosensory cues<br />

and social behavior are de-linked in NZB males. In standard odor<br />

preference test CBA males showed strong preference <strong>for</strong> receptive<br />

female odor relative to male odor (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!