on Culture & Development - Seameo-SPAFA

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○POST SCRIPT“In this time of globalization, with all itsadvantages, the poor are the most vulnerable tohaving their traditions, relationships and knowledgeand skills ignored and denigrated, and experiencingdevelopment with a great sense of trauma, lossand social disconnectedness”- James D. Wolfensohn, World Bank President130Wolfensohn’s comment quoted above may clarify orvalidate the need for developing Guidelines such asthose presented here - so that we can attempt toreverse the trend of negative developmentalexperiences. However, is it enough to onlyrecognize that globalization does not benefit all butin fact can have extremely negative impacts? It is astatement of fact but offers no remedy for action.The comment below, from one of the participants,highlights a key issue:“I’m not sure if this kind of workshop has beenconducted for senior government officials and bigdonor agencies like DFID, World Bank and ADB. Iwould recommend that we spread out thisworkshop concept in a wider range…”The key issue alluded to here is that even if theWorld Bank or any other organization of similarstature in principle identifies and articulates theproblem but does not respond to it then thatproblem will remain. The initial suggested responseis that staff of major donor agencies become better