on Culture & Development - Seameo-SPAFA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Rationale for Review and ReflectionThe rationale for the review and reflection activities is thatit provides for an on-going evaluation that allows thefacilitators to learn from the participants regarding whatthey are experiencing. Furthermore, it allows for adaptationof the workshop materials or a change of pace to be madein response to comments made by them. Adopting thisstyle of participatory workshop facilitation is of courseclosely aligned to the workshop objectives. As the sayinggoes, “Practice what you preach”! Or more aptly, “Practicewhat you believe” as no preaching should be taking placeduring the course of the workshop!This was noted by a past participant in commenting on theworkshop atmosphere as follows:“…the facilitators were really very welcoming of anyopinion so we just bared our thoughts in a non-hostileenvironment.”23Information CollectionFor the first round of workshops, in addition to informationsought from participants on the standardized applicationform, a pre-workshop task was required. This task included,amongst other things, formulation of an ‘expectation’statement and a ‘problem’ statement. This task wasdiscarded with the commencement of the second round ofworkshops, primarily on the basis that the time incurredbetween the submission of the statements and actualattendance at the workshop was too long. This usuallynegated the relevance of the originally submittedstatements. However, it is noted here should this type ofpre-workshop information collection be feasible in yourparticular case. Please refer to p.24 of the 1 st edition of theGuidelines for more information.
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○Participants were requested and encouraged to bringto the workshop supporting materials related to theirorganization and/or project work. This could include,as examples, video documentation, photographs,project reports, and organizational brochures. Theseprovide useful references throughout the workshop.On occasions, some participants were keen to makepresentations on their organizations and accordinglythe materials were thus used for this purpose inspecially arranged ‘show and tell’ sessions.24Advance and Ongoing PreparationFrom the very outset of the workshop, facilitators needto be mindful that the concluding day does in manyways represent the culmination of the inputs,experiences, and feelings of the preceding four days.In this respect it is useful to note the variouscomments made by participants throughout the week.These can, for example, be written in quotation bubblemarks and posted in the workshop room. They providea useful reference on Day 5 which is primarily a day ofreflection. It is very interesting to track what are quiteoften the stark changes of opinion as expressed on thelast day to what was expressed earlier on in the week.Case studies comprise the main focus of Day 5 andthus require advance preparation. Two differentstrategies were employed during the 2 nd series ofworkshops. One strategy was to identify and theninvite some of the participants to prepare a case studyin advance. Time constraints obviously limit thenumber of case studies that can viably be presented.The number of participants attending the workshopalso places constraints on the number of case studypresentations requested. On average, each workshophad 40 participants and as such, an ‘open’ invitation
Page 2: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 5 and 6: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 7 and 8: ContentsPreface to 2004 Guidelines
Page 9 and 10: “Development as it affects a comm
Page 11 and 12: 10PREFACE TO 2004 GUIDELINES EDITIO
Page 13 and 14: Fororeworord:12FororeworordDespite
Page 16 and 17: PART ONE15HOW THE GUIDELINES EVOLVE
Page 18 and 19: the best of intentions we can not o
Page 21 and 22: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 23: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 27 and 28: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 29: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 33 and 34: 32“Tolerance, inter-cultural dial
Page 35 and 36: 34IntroductionThe first day of the
Page 37 and 38: 36other groups may share those valu
Page 39 and 40: TOPICSWhat do I expect from this wo
Page 41 and 42: 406. A representative from each gro
Page 43 and 44: 1.3 Meanings of CultureTime: 90 min
Page 45 and 46: 4) Culture is the roles and guideli
Page 47 and 48: Step 26. The following cultural map
Page 49 and 50: Notes on Cultural MappingCultural m
Page 51 and 52: 50Discussion following this activit
Page 53 and 54: Questions ChecklistHas my understan
Page 55 and 56: 54“We need to find ways of relati
Page 57 and 58: 56IntroductionFollowing on from the
Page 59: 58include supporters or opponents o
Page 62 and 63: Activity 2.3 - Development CartoonT
Page 64 and 65: Activity 2.4 - Tools BrainstormTime
Page 66 and 67: 2. Invite volunteers to explain bri
Page 68 and 69: Activity 2.6 - Enabling & Inhibitin
Page 71 and 72: Questions ChecklistWhat is my view
Page 73 and 74: 72“Mr. Director General, why is i
Page 75 and 76:
74IntroductionRead the following co
Page 77:
76redundant because they consider t
Page 80 and 81:
Activity 3.3 The Programme Cycle79T
Page 82 and 83:
COUNTRYCONSULTATIONSEVALUATIONIDENT
Page 84:
What it is and why we use itFirst w
Page 87 and 88:
TERMAssumptionsMEANINGFactors exter
Page 89 and 90:
88Table 2: Log FrameOBJECTIVESPURPO
Page 91 and 92:
participants when they took the rol
Page 93 and 94:
Avoiding log frame design problems(
Page 95 and 96:
Questions ChecklistHow can I promot
Page 97 and 98:
96“One of the most difficult thin
Page 99 and 100:
98IntroductionThe overall aim of Da
Page 101 and 102:
100Activity 4.5, like 4.3, recommen
Page 103 and 104:
TOPICSHow does the way we represent
Page 105 and 106:
1044. Ask participants to repeat th
Page 107 and 108:
Activity 4.5 Attitudes and Assumpti
Page 109 and 110:
Activity 4.6 Colleague Card SortSou
Page 111 and 112:
Activity 4.7 Describing a Resourcef
Page 113 and 114:
Questions ChecklistWhat are my pers
Page 115 and 116:
114“Reconciliation is to understa
Page 117 and 118:
116IntroductionThroughout the works
Page 119 and 120:
TOPICSWhat is meant by conflict med
Page 121 and 122:
120maybe without even realizing or
Page 123 and 124:
1223. If necessary, demonstrate. Fo
Page 125 and 126:
124Notes on procedure: The above st
Page 127 and 128:
Conclusion126Transforming situation
Page 129 and 130:
128
Page 131 and 132:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 133 and 134:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 135 and 136:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 137 and 138:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 139 and 140:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 141 and 142:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 143 and 144:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 145 and 146:
ContributorsAnuchit Jittrathanakul
Page 147 and 148:
ContributorsVirongrung Bodharamik (
Page 149:
148For information and enquiries:Ce
show all

on Culture & Development - Seameo-SPAFA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?