on Culture & Development - Seameo-SPAFA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○Introduction to Workshop FormatPreviewsDay 1 commences with an overview of the whole workshop but also specificallyoutlines or previews what will take place on that day. From Day 2 onwards,following the participant review of the previous day, this preview input from thefacilitator constitutes the initial activity. The rationale for this is to clearlyestablish the goal or purpose of the day’s activities. It may also allow for thefacilitator to perhaps address concerns or questions raised in the previousreview especially regarding any identified missing ‘links’. It is not uncommonthat a particular activity may have been judged not to have fully addressed itscore objective and thus the preview section, where applicable, does afford thefacilitator the opportunity to establish the linkage between each day andhighlight how certain activities are subsequently followed through. Rather thanpreview the day with a menu of activities, a visual image was created andaccompanied by a verbal outline. These visuals were posted on the walls wherethey could be used as a reference and reminder to what was to come and tolink back to previous activities. These ‘mindscapes’ can also provide someassurance for participants. As most activity handouts are given out after theactivity to avoid directly influencing its outcome, some participants mightexperience some unease in this regard because they feel they are venturinginto the unknown. So the mindscapes can be useful to allay such concerns andthus ensure that the ‘comfort zone’ of the participants is maintained.21ReviewsAt the close of Day 1, the facilitators should randomly divide the participantsinto 4 groups and advise that each group will take turns in providing a reviewof one of the workshop days. Assign each group to a particular day. Thepreparation for the review can be made outside the workshop environmentallowing for greater informal expression without time limitations. It is advisableto suggest that the format of the review has many options ranging from a moretraditional power point presentation to a role play input. The important thing to
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○stress is that not only should all group members participatein the provision of the review content but that it should focuson what was learnt and not merely comprise a literal recap ofthe activities undertaken. It should be a constructivefeedback containing suggestions for improvement and raiseany issues felt to be unclear.22ReflectionsAs an end of day activity, participants are asked to reflect onthe questions posted in the Questions Checklist that concludeeach chapter. The Questions Checklist is related to the day’smain topic(s) and is designed to focus participants onlearning outcomes. This 10 minute activity is for all theworkshop participants to stimulate individual reflection onwhat has exactly transpired throughout the day. It is not justfor the selected review group. However, responses to thequestions could provide an outline or basis for the groupassigned to present the review.Daily EvaluationSome form of personal daily evaluation can prove invaluable.During the workshops a simply-devised daily evaluationchecklist sheet was provided to help focus the participants onthe workshop inputs, lessons learnt, and suggestions forimprovements. Additionally, within such a checklist, selfevaluationon one’s own level of participation and level ofsatisfaction with the day’s proceedings is a useful reminder tothe participants when they come to complete the end- ofworkshopevaluation form.
Page 2: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 5 and 6: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 7 and 8: ContentsPreface to 2004 Guidelines
Page 9 and 10: “Development as it affects a comm
Page 11 and 12: 10PREFACE TO 2004 GUIDELINES EDITIO
Page 13 and 14: Fororeworord:12FororeworordDespite
Page 16 and 17: PART ONE15HOW THE GUIDELINES EVOLVE
Page 18 and 19: the best of intentions we can not o
Page 21: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 25 and 26: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 27 and 28: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 29: ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○
Page 33 and 34: 32“Tolerance, inter-cultural dial
Page 35 and 36: 34IntroductionThe first day of the
Page 37 and 38: 36other groups may share those valu
Page 39 and 40: TOPICSWhat do I expect from this wo
Page 41 and 42: 406. A representative from each gro
Page 43 and 44: 1.3 Meanings of CultureTime: 90 min
Page 45 and 46: 4) Culture is the roles and guideli
Page 47 and 48: Step 26. The following cultural map
Page 49 and 50: Notes on Cultural MappingCultural m
Page 51 and 52: 50Discussion following this activit
Page 53 and 54: Questions ChecklistHas my understan
Page 55 and 56: 54“We need to find ways of relati
Page 57 and 58: 56IntroductionFollowing on from the
Page 59: 58include supporters or opponents o
Page 62 and 63: Activity 2.3 - Development CartoonT
Page 64 and 65: Activity 2.4 - Tools BrainstormTime
Page 66 and 67: 2. Invite volunteers to explain bri
Page 68 and 69: Activity 2.6 - Enabling & Inhibitin
Page 71 and 72: Questions ChecklistWhat is my view
Page 73 and 74:
72“Mr. Director General, why is i
Page 75 and 76:
74IntroductionRead the following co
Page 77:
76redundant because they consider t
Page 80 and 81:
Activity 3.3 The Programme Cycle79T
Page 82 and 83:
COUNTRYCONSULTATIONSEVALUATIONIDENT
Page 84:
What it is and why we use itFirst w
Page 87 and 88:
TERMAssumptionsMEANINGFactors exter
Page 89 and 90:
88Table 2: Log FrameOBJECTIVESPURPO
Page 91 and 92:
participants when they took the rol
Page 93 and 94:
Avoiding log frame design problems(
Page 95 and 96:
Questions ChecklistHow can I promot
Page 97 and 98:
96“One of the most difficult thin
Page 99 and 100:
98IntroductionThe overall aim of Da
Page 101 and 102:
100Activity 4.5, like 4.3, recommen
Page 103 and 104:
TOPICSHow does the way we represent
Page 105 and 106:
1044. Ask participants to repeat th
Page 107 and 108:
Activity 4.5 Attitudes and Assumpti
Page 109 and 110:
Activity 4.6 Colleague Card SortSou
Page 111 and 112:
Activity 4.7 Describing a Resourcef
Page 113 and 114:
Questions ChecklistWhat are my pers
Page 115 and 116:
114“Reconciliation is to understa
Page 117 and 118:
116IntroductionThroughout the works
Page 119 and 120:
TOPICSWhat is meant by conflict med
Page 121 and 122:
120maybe without even realizing or
Page 123 and 124:
1223. If necessary, demonstrate. Fo
Page 125 and 126:
124Notes on procedure: The above st
Page 127 and 128:
Conclusion126Transforming situation
Page 129 and 130:
128
Page 131 and 132:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 133 and 134:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 135 and 136:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 137 and 138:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 139 and 140:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 141 and 142:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 143 and 144:
○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○○ ○
Page 145 and 146:
ContributorsAnuchit Jittrathanakul
Page 147 and 148:
ContributorsVirongrung Bodharamik (
Page 149:
148For information and enquiries:Ce
show all

on Culture & Development - Seameo-SPAFA

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?