Vulnerability <strong>and</strong> <strong>Impacts</strong> on Human Development 69evaluated the value of beach width using a hedonic pricing model 8 <strong>and</strong> found that residentialproperty values may decline substantially in places affected by increased erosionrates <strong>and</strong> costs of s<strong>and</strong> nourishment. The analysis suggests that residential housingvalues in coastal regions may be sensitive to the availability of s<strong>and</strong> for maintainingbeaches. Chapter 3 of this report discusses some of the impacts on natural resourcessystems that can also provide ecosystem services that benefit human systems (see alsoReal Estate <strong>and</strong> Tax Revenue, section 4.4.5) Public listening sessions conducted in NorthCarolina in 2010 raised concerns over anticipated community costs of adapting vulnerableinfrastructure in response to potential climate change impacts as well as respondingto increased job losses in fisheries, reduction of agricultural l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> the farmingindustry, loss of manufacturing plants along the water, <strong>and</strong> declines in tourism (Brownet al., 2010). On an individual level, inspirational <strong>and</strong> tacit values of coastal lagoons, orsense of place, are difficult to value <strong>and</strong> often overlooked in evaluating impacts (Anthonyet al., 2009).Since the 2009 NCA, considerable advancements have been made towards underst<strong>and</strong>ingthe links between environmental stressors <strong>and</strong> social vulnerability in coastalareas <strong>and</strong> developing the empirical basis for assessing differential impacts. Most ofthe extant research examines a single stressor; for example, Lin <strong>and</strong> Morefield (2011)produced a relative ranking of vulnerability for coastal communities in the NationalEstuary Program, incorporating measures of estuary conditions such as water quality,sediment, contaminants, benthic quality, coupled with human-induced l<strong>and</strong>-use changessuch as impervious surface <strong>and</strong> wetl<strong>and</strong> loss, <strong>and</strong> socio-economics. In the contextof hurricanes, several recent papers examine the relationship between hurricane hazardssuch as windfields <strong>and</strong> storm surge <strong>and</strong> the differential impact on social groupsin coastal areas with case studies of the Mississippi coast after Hurricane Katrina (Burton,2010), Miami (Bjarnadottir et al., 2011) <strong>and</strong> Sarasota, Florida (Frazier et al., 2010a).Frazier <strong>and</strong> others (2010a) concluded that future sea-level rise contributes to the spatialextent of storm-surge impacts even without an increase in intensity or severity ofhurricanes. Bjarnadottir <strong>and</strong> others (2011) also examined storm surge-height <strong>and</strong> windspeeds for various future climate scenarios <strong>and</strong> concluded that more deaths <strong>and</strong> injurieswill be expected because of hurricane frequency <strong>and</strong> higher intensities. As discussed inpreceding chapters, an increase in hurricane frequency is not indicated by recent climatemodels <strong>and</strong> trends.Another area of integrated hazard assessment examines the relationship betweenpopulations displaced by hurricanes <strong>and</strong> their underlying vulnerability, resilience, <strong>and</strong>hurricane risk (Mitchell et al., 2011). In the development of a comparative index of hurricanedisplacement, Esnard <strong>and</strong> others (2011) found that, of the 158 coastal countiesstudied from Texas to North Carolina, coastal Florida counties are the most vulnerable,especially those in South Florida because of the combination of hurricane risk probability<strong>and</strong> extant social vulnerability. Another study examined the relative vulnerability of8 A hedonic model is based on price factors that are determined both by the internal characteristics of thegood being sold <strong>and</strong> the external factors affecting the value of those goods. One example is the housingmarket in which the price of housing is affected by factors such as the size <strong>and</strong> characteristics of the house,the neighborhood, proximity to schools <strong>and</strong> hospitals <strong>and</strong> mortgage interest rates.
70 <strong>Coastal</strong> <strong>Impacts</strong>, <strong>Adaptation</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Vulnerabilities</strong>coastal counties in terms of the erosion hazard (Boruff et al., 2005) throughout the U.S.based on physical process indicators such as tidal range, slope, shoreline erosion <strong>and</strong> accretionrates, <strong>and</strong> social vulnerability. The intersection of physical <strong>and</strong> social measureshighlighted the differences in relative vulnerability, with the Gulf Coast vulnerabilitymore reflective of social characteristics <strong>and</strong> the Pacific <strong>and</strong> Atlantic coast counties morereflective of physical attributes.Research demonstrates a paucity of multi-peril or multi-stressor vulnerability assessments.One of the most recent studies examined climate-sensitive hazards for thesouthern U.S. using drought, flooding, hurricane winds, <strong>and</strong> sea-level rise (Emrich &Cutter, 2011). The differential spatial impacts were determined as the intersection ofhazards <strong>and</strong> social vulnerability. Using a technique known as bivariate mapping, thestudy found counties with high levels of social vulnerability <strong>and</strong> multiple hazard exposure;these were designated as hotspots. Many of these are located in coastal counties inTexas, Louisiana, <strong>and</strong> Florida.4.3 Socio-economic <strong>Impacts</strong> <strong>and</strong> ImplicationsUrban CentersThe impacts of Hurricane Katrina on New Orleans <strong>and</strong> other coastal communities exemplifiedthe disparities among how people of different racial <strong>and</strong> socio-economic groupsmight be affected differently by extreme weather events. Particular areas of disparityincluded: who lived in neighborhoods that were vulnerable to flooding, which groupswere evacuated during the flood, how different groups were treated during the evacuation,which neighborhoods belonging to which groups were rebuilt, <strong>and</strong> who was representedin the decision-making process (Mohai et al., 2009). Heberger <strong>and</strong> others (2009)also found that communities of color would be disproportionally impacted by coastalflooding in San Francisco Bay, CA. Research in East Boston, MA, (Douglas et al., 2012;Kirshen et al., 2012) found that recent, low income immigrants have few adaptation optionsbecause they are limited by economic, political, or social resources, but the participatoryresearch found that participants appeared to be empowered by the knowledgethey gained during the process <strong>and</strong> wanted to take action.Rosenzweig <strong>and</strong> others (2011) summarized potential storm-surge impacts on infrastructurein the New York City metro area under several scenarios of sea-level rise. Theseinclude flooding of thermal power plants, wastewater treatment plants, transit systems<strong>and</strong> basements, <strong>and</strong> increased combined sewer overflows. They report on a range ofhard <strong>and</strong> soft adaptation strategies under the planning framework of Flexible <strong>Adaptation</strong>Pathways, which is essentially a series of responses tied to changes in knowledgeof the climate <strong>and</strong> socio-economic conditions. They also propose the setting of <strong>Climate</strong>Protection Levels for critical infrastructure; for instance, one proposal plans for 4 feet ofsea-level rise by 2080 with all critical infrastructure designed to be protected to this level.The San Francisco Bay area has 7 million people, 9 counties, <strong>and</strong> 46 cities along theshoreline. If sea level rises 55 inches, the new floodplain of the 100-year coastal stormsurge could potentially flood 270,000 people, over 90 percent of areas of airports, 20percent of areas of ports, <strong>and</strong> 28 percent of areas of water-related industry in addition tostressing public health, <strong>and</strong> flood wastewater treatment plants, rail lines, <strong>and</strong> beaches.
- Page 1:
National Climate Assessment Regiona
- Page 5 and 6:
© 2012 The National Oceanic and At
- Page 8:
Coastal Impacts, Adaptation,and Vul
- Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 3Lead Author: Carlton H. He
- Page 16 and 17:
ContentsKey TermsAcronymsCommunicat
- Page 18 and 19:
4.4 Human Health Impacts and Implic
- Page 20 and 21:
Key TermsxixExposure 3 - The nature
- Page 22 and 23:
AcronymsxxiNAO - North Atlantic Osc
- Page 26 and 27:
Executive Summaryxxvffffffffffffffo
- Page 28 and 29:
Executive Summaryxxviiweakened by v
- Page 30 and 31:
Executive SummaryxxixAdaptation and
- Page 34:
Introduction and Context 3irrigatio
- Page 40 and 41:
Introduction and Context 9coastal w
- Page 42 and 43:
Physical Climate Forces 11fffffffff
- Page 44 and 45:
Physical Climate Forces 13Figure 2-
- Page 46 and 47:
Physical Climate Forces 15Sea-level
- Page 48 and 49:
Physical Climate Forces 17maintain
- Page 50 and 51: Physical Climate Forces 19These low
- Page 52 and 53: Physical Climate Forces 21Figure 2-
- Page 54 and 55: Physical Climate Forces 23that surv
- Page 56 and 57: Physical Climate Forces 25Table 2-2
- Page 58 and 59: Physical Climate Forces 27Most of t
- Page 60 and 61: Physical Climate Forces 29(low to m
- Page 62 and 63: Physical Climate Forces 31A number
- Page 64 and 65: Physical Climate Forces 33off the c
- Page 66 and 67: Physical Climate Forces 35in these
- Page 68 and 69: Physical Climate Forces 37this diff
- Page 70 and 71: Physical Climate Forces 39in input
- Page 72 and 73: Physical Climate Forces 41Intensifi
- Page 74 and 75: Physical Climate Forces 43depth qua
- Page 76 and 77: Physical Climate Forces 45precipita
- Page 78 and 79: Physical Climate Forces 47Sea and w
- Page 80 and 81: Physical Climate Forces 49by sea ic
- Page 82 and 83: Physical Climate Forces 51niche ero
- Page 84 and 85: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 86 and 87: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 88 and 89: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 90 and 91: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 92 and 93: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 94 and 95: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 96 and 97: Vulnerability and Impacts on Natura
- Page 98 and 99: Vulnerability and Impacts on Human
- Page 103 and 104: 72 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 105 and 106: 74 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 107 and 108: 76 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 109 and 110: 78 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 111 and 112: 80 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 113 and 114: 82 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 115 and 116: 84 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 117 and 118: 86 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 119 and 120: 88 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 121 and 122: 90 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 123 and 124: 92 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 125 and 126: 94 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 127 and 128: 96 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and
- Page 129 and 130: Chapter 5Adaptation and MitigationK
- Page 131 and 132: 100 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 133 and 134: 102 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 135 and 136: 104 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 137 and 138: 106 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 139 and 140: 108 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 141 and 142: 110 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 143 and 144: 112 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 145 and 146: 114 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 147 and 148: 116 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 149 and 150: 118 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 151 and 152:
120 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 153 and 154:
122 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 155 and 156:
124 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 157 and 158:
126 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 159 and 160:
128 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 161 and 162:
130 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 163 and 164:
132 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 165 and 166:
134 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 167 and 168:
136 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 169 and 170:
138 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 171 and 172:
140 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 173 and 174:
142 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 175 and 176:
ReferencesAbuodha, P. & Woodroffe,
- Page 177 and 178:
146 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 179 and 180:
148 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 181 and 182:
150 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 183 and 184:
152 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 185 and 186:
154 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 187 and 188:
156 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 189 and 190:
158 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 191 and 192:
160 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 193 and 194:
162 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 195 and 196:
164 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 197 and 198:
166 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 199 and 200:
168 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 201 and 202:
170 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 203 and 204:
172 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 205 and 206:
174 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 207 and 208:
176 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 209 and 210:
178 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 211 and 212:
180 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 213 and 214:
182 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 215 and 216:
184 Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, an
- Page 217:
Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vu